Title: Expanding of the left
Source document: Linguistica Brunensia. 2017, vol. 65, iss. 2, pp. 7-20
Extent
7-20
-
ISSN1803-7410 (print)2336-4440 (online)
Stable URL (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/137678
Type: Article
Language
License: Not specified license
Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.
Abstract(s)
In this paper I discuss the particle ande in Greek as a discourse element that expresses the speaker's attitude towards the utterance, building on work on its Romanian counterpart hai/haide. The background assumption is that ande anchors the utterance to the speech event. It is shown that it can modify an imperative, a subjunctive, a pu-clause, or an adverbial/PP expression. Assuming that there is a Speech Act layer in the uppermost part of the left periphery, it is shown that ande realizes a predicative position in that layer. The different readings it gives rise to are derived on the basis of the utterance it embeds. Since there is no event structure in that layer, the elements that realize the Speech Act position are 'defective' in both inflectional and thematic terms.
References
[1] Cardinaletti, Anna. 2015. Italian Verb-based Discourse Particles in a Comparative Perspective. In: Bayer, Joseph et al., eds. Discourse-Oriented Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 71–91.
[2] Coniglio, Marco – Zegrean, Iulia. 2012. Splitting Up Force. Evidence from Discourse Particles. In: Lobke, Aelbrecht et al., eds. Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 229–256.
[3] Fagard, Benjamin. 2010. É vidha, ola…: Imperatives as Discourse Markers and Grammaticalization Paths in Romance. A Diachronic Corpus Study. Languages in Contrast 10(2), pp. 245–267.
[4] Haegeman, Liliane – Hill, Virginia. 2013. The Syntacticization of Discourse. In: Folli, Rafaella et al., eds. Syntax and Its Limits. Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 370–390.
[5] Heim, Johannes et al. 2016. Intonation and Particles as Speech Act Modifiers: A Syntactic Analysis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37(2), pp. 109–129. | DOI 10.1515/scl-2016-0005
[6] Hill, Virginia. 2008. Pragmatic Markers as Syntactic Heads: A Case Study from Romanian. In: Grohmann, Kleanthes – Panagiotidis, Phοevos, eds. Selected Papers form the 2006 Cyprus Syntasfest. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 237–265.
[7] Hill, Virginia. 2014. Vocatives. How Syntax Meets Pragmatics. [With the contribution of Melita Stavrou]. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
[8] Joseph, Brian D. 1990. On Arguing for Serial Verbs (with Special Reference to Modern Greek). In: Joseph, Brian D. – Zwicky, Arnold, eds. When Verbs Collide: Papers from the Ohio State Mini-Conference on Serial Verbs. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 39, pp. 77–90.
[9] Kratzer, Angelika. 1999. Beyond 'ouch' and 'oops': How Descriptive and Expressive Meaning Interact. Paper presented at the Cornell Conference on Theories of Context Dependency.
[10] Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Agreements That Occur Mainly in the Main Clause. Paper presented at the Main Clause Phenomena workshop. Ghent University/GISt, September 2010.
[11] Nicholas, Nick. 2010. A Turkish Etymology for Both α and σιχτίρ; Blog: Hellenisteukontos. http://hellenisteukontos.blogspot.gr/2010/06/turkish-etymology-for-both-and.html
[12] Roberts, Ian – Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13] Roussou, Anna. 2000. On the Left Periphery: Modal Particles and Complementizers. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1, pp. 65–94. | DOI 10.1075/jgl.1.05rou
[14] Roussou, Anna. 2015. Is Particle a (Unified) Category? In: Bayer, Joseph et al., eds. Discourse-Oriented Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 121–158.
[15] Speas, Peggy – Tenny, Carol. 2003. Configurational Properties of Point of View Roles. In: di Sciullo, Anna Maria, ed. Asymmetry in Grammar: Vol. I Syntax and Semantics. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, pp. 315–344.
[16] Tschizmarova, Ivelina. 2005. Hedging Functions of the Bulgarian Discourse Marker xajde. Journal of Pragmatics 37(8), pp. 1143–1163. | DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.003
[17] Zimmermann, Malte. 2011. Discourse Particles. In Maienborn, C. et al., eds. Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 2011–2038.
[18] Zwicky, Arnold, M. 1985. Clitics and Particles. Language 61(2), pp. 283–305. | DOI 10.2307/414146
[2] Coniglio, Marco – Zegrean, Iulia. 2012. Splitting Up Force. Evidence from Discourse Particles. In: Lobke, Aelbrecht et al., eds. Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 229–256.
[3] Fagard, Benjamin. 2010. É vidha, ola…: Imperatives as Discourse Markers and Grammaticalization Paths in Romance. A Diachronic Corpus Study. Languages in Contrast 10(2), pp. 245–267.
[4] Haegeman, Liliane – Hill, Virginia. 2013. The Syntacticization of Discourse. In: Folli, Rafaella et al., eds. Syntax and Its Limits. Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 370–390.
[5] Heim, Johannes et al. 2016. Intonation and Particles as Speech Act Modifiers: A Syntactic Analysis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37(2), pp. 109–129. | DOI 10.1515/scl-2016-0005
[6] Hill, Virginia. 2008. Pragmatic Markers as Syntactic Heads: A Case Study from Romanian. In: Grohmann, Kleanthes – Panagiotidis, Phοevos, eds. Selected Papers form the 2006 Cyprus Syntasfest. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 237–265.
[7] Hill, Virginia. 2014. Vocatives. How Syntax Meets Pragmatics. [With the contribution of Melita Stavrou]. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
[8] Joseph, Brian D. 1990. On Arguing for Serial Verbs (with Special Reference to Modern Greek). In: Joseph, Brian D. – Zwicky, Arnold, eds. When Verbs Collide: Papers from the Ohio State Mini-Conference on Serial Verbs. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 39, pp. 77–90.
[9] Kratzer, Angelika. 1999. Beyond 'ouch' and 'oops': How Descriptive and Expressive Meaning Interact. Paper presented at the Cornell Conference on Theories of Context Dependency.
[10] Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Agreements That Occur Mainly in the Main Clause. Paper presented at the Main Clause Phenomena workshop. Ghent University/GISt, September 2010.
[11] Nicholas, Nick. 2010. A Turkish Etymology for Both α and σιχτίρ; Blog: Hellenisteukontos. http://hellenisteukontos.blogspot.gr/2010/06/turkish-etymology-for-both-and.html
[12] Roberts, Ian – Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13] Roussou, Anna. 2000. On the Left Periphery: Modal Particles and Complementizers. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1, pp. 65–94. | DOI 10.1075/jgl.1.05rou
[14] Roussou, Anna. 2015. Is Particle a (Unified) Category? In: Bayer, Joseph et al., eds. Discourse-Oriented Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 121–158.
[15] Speas, Peggy – Tenny, Carol. 2003. Configurational Properties of Point of View Roles. In: di Sciullo, Anna Maria, ed. Asymmetry in Grammar: Vol. I Syntax and Semantics. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, pp. 315–344.
[16] Tschizmarova, Ivelina. 2005. Hedging Functions of the Bulgarian Discourse Marker xajde. Journal of Pragmatics 37(8), pp. 1143–1163. | DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.003
[17] Zimmermann, Malte. 2011. Discourse Particles. In Maienborn, C. et al., eds. Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 2011–2038.
[18] Zwicky, Arnold, M. 1985. Clitics and Particles. Language 61(2), pp. 283–305. | DOI 10.2307/414146