Apropos of internal pragmatics

Variant title
Ještě k vnitřní pragmatice
Author: Svoboda, Aleš
Source document: Brno studies in English. 1976, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 187-224
Extent
187-224
Type
Article
Language
English
License: Not specified license
Summary language
Document
References:
[1] Adamec, P. (1966). Porjadok slov v russkom jazyke [Word order in Russian] (Prague).

[2] Apresjan, Ju. D. (1967). Eksperimental'noje isslertovanije semantiki russkogo glagola [The experimental investigation of the semantics of the Russian verb] (Moscow).

[3] Bierwisch, M. (1970). Semantics , in Lyons (1970.166—84).

[4] Bolinger, D. (1967). Adjectives in English: atribution and predication , Lingua, vol. 18, 1.1—34 (Amsterdam). | DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(67)90018-6

[5] Bolinger, D. (1969). Categories, features, attributes , Brno Studies in English 8.37—41 (Brno).

[6] Bott, M. F. (1970). Computational linguistics , in Lyons (1970.215—28).

[7] Campbell, R., Wales, R. (1970). The study of language acquisition , in Lyons (1970.242—60).

[8] Chomsky, N., Miller, G. A. (1963). Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages , Handbook of Mathematical Psychology 2.269—322 (New York).

[9] Chomsky, N. (1968). Deep structures, surface structures and semantic interpretations , mimeographed.

[10] Curme, G. O. (1931). A grammar of the English language III (Boston).

[11] Dahl, Ö. (1971). Tenses and world-states , Gothenburg papers in Theoretical linguistics 6 (Gothenburg).

[12] Daneš, F. (1964). A three-level approach to syntax Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.225—40 (Prague).

[13] Daneš, F. (1966). The relation of centre and periphery as a language universal , Travaux Unguistiques dé Prague 2.9—21 (Prague).

[14] Daneš, F. (1971). On linguistic strata (levels) , Travaux linguistiques de Prague 4.127—43 (Prague).

[15] Dušková, L. (1972). The passive voice in Czech and English , Philologica Pragensia 15.93—118 (Prague).

[16] Firbas, J. (1959a). Thoughts on the communicative function of the verb in English, German and Czech , Brno studies in English 1.39—68. (Prague).

[17] Firbas, J. (1959b). More thoughts on the communicative function of the English verb , Sborník prací filosofické fakulty brněnské university A7.74—98 (Brno).

[18] Firbas, J. (1961). On the communicative value of the modern English finite verb , Brno studies in English 3.79—104 (Prague).

[19] Firbas, J. (1964a). On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis , Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.267—80 (Prague).

[20] Firbas, J. (1964b). From comparative word-order studies , Brno studies in English 4.111—28 (Prague).

[21] Firbas, J. (1965). A note on transition proper in functional sentence analysis , Philologica Pragensia 8.170—6 (Prague).

[22] Firbas, J. (1966). Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English , Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.239—56 (Prague).

[23] Firbas, J. (1968). On the prosodic features of the English finite verb as means of functional sentence perspective , Brno studies in English 7.11—48 (Brno).

[24] Firbas, J . (1969). On the prosodic features of the Modern English verb-object combination as means of functional sentence perspective , Brno studies in English 8.49—59 (Brno).

[25] Fodor, J. D. (1970). Formal linguistics and formal logic , in Lyons (1970.198—214).

[26] Halliday, M. A. K. (1969a). Options and functions in the English clause , Brno studies in English 8.81—88 (Brno).

[27] Halliday, M. A. K. (1969b). Clause typos and structural function , a preliminary version of Halliday (1970a).

[28] Halliday, M. A. K. (1970a). Language structure and language function , in Lyons (1970.140—65).

[29] Halliday, M. A. K. (1970b). Functional diversity in language , paper read to the Yale Linguistic Club 1970.

[30] Hausenblas, K. (1964), On the characterization and classification of discourses , Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.67—83 (Prague).

[31] Horálek, K. (1967). Filosofie jazyka [Philosophy of language], Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Philologica Monographia 15 (Prague).

[32] Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1970). The perception and memory of sentences , in Lyons (1970.261—70).

[33] Kiparsky, P. (1970). Historical linguistics , in Lyons (1970.302—15).

[34] Kirkwood, H. W. (1970). Some systemic means of 'functional sentence perspective' in English and German , IRAL 8:2. (Heidelberg).

[35] Leech, G. N. (1969). Towards a semantic description of English (London).

[36] Leontjev, A. A. et al. (1968). Těorija rečevoj dějatělnosti [The theory of speech activity] (Moscow).

[37] Lyons, J. (1969). Introduction to theoretical linguistics (Cambridge).

[38] Lyons, J. ed. (1970). New horizons in linguistics (Penguin Books).

[39] Mathesius, V. (1911). On the potentiality of the phenomena of language , in Vachek (1964.1—32). Originally published in Czech under the title O potencionálnosti jevů jazykových, Věstník královské české společnosti nauk, třída filosoficko-historická, sect. 2 (Prague).

[40] Mathesius, V. (1928). On linguistic characterology with illustrations from Modern English , Proposition, Actes du premier congrès international de linguistes (Leiden). Republished in Vachek (1964.59—67).

[41] Mathesius, V. (1935). Nebojte se angličtiny [Don't be afraid of English] (Prague).

[42] Mathesius, V. (1936). On some problems of the systematic analysis of grammar , TCLP 6.95—107. Republished in Vachek (1964.306—19).

[43] Mathesius, V. (1947). Čeština a obecný jazykozpyt [The Czech language and general linguistics] (Prague).

[44] Mathesius, V. (1951). Obsahový rozbor současné angličtiny na základě obecně lingvistickém [A functional analysis of present day English on a general linguistic basis], edited and annotated by J. Vachek (Prague).

[45] Miller, B. (1972). Tense, negation and possibility , International Logic Review (ed. F. Spisani) pp. 78—85 (Bologna).

[46] Mleziva, M. (1970). Stavy věcí v logické sémantice [The states of things in logical semantics], Teorie a metoda 2:2.1—14.

[47] Montague, R. (1968). Pragmatics , Contemporary Philosophy (ed. R. Klibansky), 102—21 (Firenze).

[48] Montague. R. (1970). English as a formal language , Linguaggi nella societa e nella tecnica, 189—223 (Milan).

[49] Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs (Chicago).

[50] Neustupný, J. V. (1966). On the analysis of linguistic vagueness , Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.39—51 (Prague).

[51] Nickel, G. (1968). Kontextuelle Beziehungen zwischen Sätzen im Englischen , Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts, Heft 1.

[52] Nosek, J. (1964). Notes on syntactic condensation in Modern English , Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.281—88 (Prague).

[53] Novák, P. (1966). On the three-level approach to syntax , Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2.219—23 (Prague).

[54] Ogden, C. K., Richards, I. A. (1923). The meaning of meaning (London).

[55] Palek, B. (1968). Cross-reference , Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Philologica Monographia 15 (Prague).

[56] Poldauf, I. (1967). On lexical limitations to grammatical categories , Prague studies in English 12.7—22 (Prague)

[57] Poldauf, I. (1969). The so-called medio-passive in English , Prague studies in English 13.15—34 (Prague).

[58] Poldauf, I. (1962). Strukturalismus a americký deskriptivismus [Structuralism and American descriptivism], Problémy marxistické jazykovědy, 79—110 (Prague).

[59] Prior, A. (1967). Past, Present and Future (Oxford).

[60] Searle, J. R. (1970). Speech acts (Cambridge).

[61] Sgall, P. (1967). Functional sentence perspective in a generative description , Prague studies in mathematical linguistics 2.203—25 (Prague).

[62] Sgall, P. et al. (1969). A functional approach to syntax , Generative Description of Language (New York).

[63] Svoboda, A. (1968). The hierarchy of communicative units and fields as illustrated by English attributive constructions , Brno Studies in English 7.49—101 (Brno).

[64] Šípoš, I. (1966). Pokus o empirickou analýzu sémantické neurčitosti některých slovních kategorií [An attempt at an empirical analysis of the semantic vagueness of some word categories], Studia Psychologica, Vol. 8, 4.286—305.

[65] Šmilauer, V. (1966). Novočeská skladba [Syntax of Modern Czech], (Prague).

[66] Tichý, P. (1969). Intension in terms of Turing machines , Studia logica 14.7—25.

[67] Tichý, P. (1971). An approach to intensional analysis , Noûs 5: No 3.273—97. | DOI 10.2307/2214668

[68] Thorne, J. P. (1970). Generative grammar and stylistic analysis , in Lyons (1970.185—97).

[69] Tondl, L. (1970). Sign Scientific Thought, UNESCO.

[70] Trnka, B. (1964). On the linguistic sign and the multilevel organization of language , Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1.33—40 (Prague).

[71] Trnka, B. (1968). On word order in structural linguistics , Travaux linguistiques de Prague 3.47—51 (Prague).

[72] Vachek, J. (1958). Notes on the development of language seen as a system of systems , Sborník prací filosofické fakulty brněnské university A 3.94—106 (Brno).

[73] Vachek, J. (1959). Two chapters on written English , Brno Studies in English 1.7—38 (Prague).

[74] Vachek, J., Firbas, J. (1962). Lingvistická charakteristika současné angličtiny [Linguistic characterology of contemporary English] (Prague).

[75] Vachek, J. (ed.) (1964). A Prague School reader (Bloomington).

[76] Vachek, J. (ed.) (1966). The Linguistic school of Prague (Bloomington).

[77] Žolkovskij, A. K., Mel'čuk, I. A. (1967). O semantičeskom sintěze [On the semantic synthesis], Problemy kibernětiky 19.177—238 (Moscow).

[78] Žolkovskij, A. K., Mel'čuk, I. A. (1969). K postrojeniju dějstvujuščej moděli "smysl ←→ těkst" [On construing the dynamic model "meaning ←→ text"], Mašinnyj perevod i prikladnaja lingvistika 11.5—35 (Moscow).