S nedávným nástupem systémů nové generace, založených na oddělené architektuře, se změnil způsob shromažďování a spravování vědeckých prací. S využitím moderního uživatelského prostředí nabízí nové knihovní Discovery systémy širokou škálu materiálů dostupných skrze jednotné rozhraní daleko za možnostmi fyzických sbírek knihovny. Sbírky odborných prací tak dosahují globálního významu. Tyto systémy mají také vliv na množství dat shromážděných od institucí celého světa a zvyšují tak úroveň vyhledatelnosti odborných dokumentů. Nové systémy, určené od samého počátku ke správě všech typů odborných dokumentů, využívají technologického vývoje, sdílení metadat a spolupráce odborné komunity k optimalizaci knihovních služeb. Článek se zabývá některými současnými trendy v oblasti systémů nové generace a věnuje pozornost tomu, jak shromažďování informací (odborného obsahu, bibliografických metadat a uživatelských dat) v lokálním a individuálním kontextu buduje novou úroveň organizace a správy odborných dokumentů.
The discovery and management of scholarly materials have changed in recent years with the introduction of new-generation systems based on decoupled architecture. In addition to offering a modern user experience, new library discovery systems extend the scope of materials available through a single interface far beyond the physical collections of the library, reaching the wealth of scholarly collections of global significance. Such systems also leverage a body of usage data gathered from institutions worldwide to enhance the discoverability of materials. New management systems, built from the outset to manage all types of scholarly assets, harness technological advances, shared bibliographic metadata, and community collaboration to optimize library services. The paper examines some of the current trends in new-generation systems and focuses on the way in which collaboration among stakeholders and the aggregation of information—scholarly content, bibliographic metadata, and usage data—combine with the local and individual context to establish a new level of discovery and management of scholarly materials.
vyhledávací nástroj; žebříček relevance; index agregace; využití dat; recommender; oddělená architektura
search engine; relevance ranking; aggregated index; usage data; recommender; decoupled architecture
[2] Association of College and Research Libraries (researched by Megan Oakleaf).
Value of Academic Libraries: A Comprehensive Research Review and Report. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2010.
http://www.acrl.ala.org/value/.
[6] De Rosa, Cathy, Joanne Cantrell, Diane Cellentani, Janet Hawk, Lillie Jenkins, and Alane Wilson.
Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources: A Report to the OCLC Membership. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, 2005.
http://www.oclc.org/reports/2005perceptions.htm.
[7] De Rosa, Cathy, Joanne Cantrell, Janet Hawk, and Alane Wilson.
College Students' Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources: A Report to the OCLC Membership. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, 2006.
http://www.oclc.org/reports/perceptionscollege.htm.
[8] De Rosa, Cathy, Joanne Cantrell, Andy Havens, Janet Hawk, and Lillie Jenkins.
Sharing, Privacy and Trust in Our Networked World: A Report to the OCLC Membership. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, 2007.
http://www.oclc.org/reports/sharing/default.htm.
[10] Gentil-Beccot, Anne, Salvatore Mele, Annette Holtkamp, Heath B. O'Connell, and Travis C. Brooks. "
Information Resources in High-Energy Physics: Surveying the Present Landscape and Charting the Future Course." arXiv:0804.2701v2 [cs.DL]. arXiv, 2008. doi: 10.1002/asi.20944. (Journal reference: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, no. 1 (2009): 150-160.) |
DOI 10.1002/asi.20944
[11] Haines, Laura L., J. Light, D. O'Malley, and F. A. Delwiche. "
Information-Seeking Behavior of Basic Science Researchers: Implications for Library Services." Journal of the Medical Library Association 98, no. 1 (2010): 73–81. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.1.019. |
DOI 10.3163/1536-5050.98.1.019
[13] Hemminger, Bradley M. Dihui Lu, K. T. L. Vaughan, and Stephanie J. Adams. "
Information Seeking Behavior of Academic Scientists." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, no. 14 (2007): 2205–2225. doi: 10.1002/asi.20686. |
DOI 10.1002/asi.20686
[15] Johnson, L., A. Levine, and R. Smith.
The 2009 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium, 2009.
http://wp.nmc.org/horizon2009/.
[16] Johnson, L., A. Levine, R. Smith, and S. Stone.
The 2010 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium, 2010.
http://wp.nmc.org/horizon2010/.
[20] Sadeh, Tamar. "
The Challenge of Metasearching." New Library World 105, no. 1198/1199 (2004): 104-112. doi: 10.1108/03074800410526721. |
DOI 10.1108/03074800410526721
[21] Sadeh, Tamar. " A Model of Scientists' Information Seeking and a User-Interface Design." PhD thesis, City University London, 2010.
[22] Sadeh, Tamar. " Multiple Dimensions of Search Results." Paper presented at the Analogous Spaces Interdisciplinary Conference, Ghent University, Belgium, May 15-17, 2008.
[23] Sadeh, Tamar. "
Time for a Change: New Approaches for a New Generation of Library Users. New Library World 108, no. 7/8 (2007): 307-316. doi: 10.1108/03074800710763608. |
DOI 10.1108/03074800710763608