Oblique arguments raised

Variant title
Posun nestrukturních argumentů
Source document: Linguistica Brunensia. 2016, vol. 64, iss. 1, pp. 131-142
Extent
131-142
  • ISSN
    1803-7410 (print)
    2336-4440 (online)
Type
Article
Language
English
License: Not specified license
Abstract(s)
In this article, we offer support for two claims and one observation. The claims are the following: first, there are EA (external arguments) of different types and these are introduced by different heads. This claim has been made originally for on Salish languages, but it has been adapted to other languages as well. Second, we see the auxiliary HAVE as a (particular) spell out of auxiliary BE. This move, again, is not unique and it has been proposed for various languages before. Simply put, HAVE is seen as a spell out of the auxiliary BE and certain functional heads. The observation we add is a simple observation that not all Datives in Czech are of the same origin. In particular, we look at the DAT that are introduced as Recipients: only these can be turned into GET-passives (as noted in the literature before).
Document
References:
[1] Caha, Pavel. 2006. Where's dative? Class presentation: Nanosyntax lab (September).

[2] Caha, Pavel. 2009. The Nanosyntax of Case . Ph.D. thesis. CASTL, University of Tromsø.

[3] Daneš, František. 1968. Dostal jsem přidáno a podobné pasívní konstrukce . Naše řeč. 51, pp. 269–290.

[4] Davis, Henry. 2000. Salish evidence on the causative-inchoative alternation . In: Dressler, Wolfgang, ed. Morphologica 1996. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 25–59.

[5] Davis, Henry – Demirdache, Hamida. 1995. Agents and events . Talk presented at GLOW 18.

[6] Davis, Henry – Demirdache, Hamida. 2000. On lexical verb meanings: Evidence from Salish . In: Tenny, Charles – Pustejovsky, James, eds. Events as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax. Stanford, Ca.: CSLI, pp. 97–142.

[7] Kayne, Richard. 1993. Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection . Studia Linguistica. 47(1), pp. 3–31. | DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9582.1993.tb00837.x

[8] Medová, Lucie. 2009. Reflexive Clitics in the Slavic and Romance Languages. A Comparative View from an Antipassive Perspective . Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University.

[9] Pylkkänen, Lina. 2008. Introducing Arguments . Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

[10] Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax . New York: Cambridge University Press.

[11] Szucsich, Luka. 2007. Variability with binding and syntactic relations: Polish vs. Slovenian . Talk given at SLS II., Berlin.

[12] Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 2010. Unintentionally out of control . In: Duguine, Maia – Huidobro, Susana – Madariaga, Nerea, eds. Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations from a CrossLinguistic Perspective. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 283–304.

[13] Woolford, Ellen. 2006. Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure . Linguistic Inquiry. 37, pp.111–130. | DOI 10.1162/002438906775321175