The role of clitics in Serbian presentative constructions

Title: The role of clitics in Serbian presentative constructions
Author: Raković, Sanja
Source document: Linguistica Brunensia. 2017, vol. 65, iss. 2, pp. 53-68
Extent
53-68
  • ISSN
    1803-7410 (print)
    2336-4440 (online)
Type: Article
Language
License: Not specified license
 

Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.

Abstract(s)
Presentative constructions in Serbian allow two patterns [presentative particle NPGEN] and [presentative particle CLi NPiNOM]. This paper proposes derivations of these patterns. The premise is that the choice between the two patterns is determined by the the type of inert v0. Namely, the first pattern is derived if inert v0 can assign partitive case, i.e. v0 [PART], while the latter pattern is derived if v0 cannot assign partitive case. A special focus is put on the [CLi+NPi] pattern since it represents a case of the co-occurrence of a pronominal clitic and a co-indexed NP, which is not characteristic of Serbian. It is argued that the relationship between the NP and the co-indexed clitic is that of agreement. The X0 and the NP establish a relationship in which X0 assigns nominative case to the NP and the NP values X0’s [uφ:]. This agreement is taken to be the same kind of agreement that holds between an NPNOM and the X0 which is in charge of agreement with participles in Serbian. The only twist in presentative constructions is the absence of a verb in the numeration. This means that the φ-features checked in X0 cannot be pronounced as an integral part of a participle. Allowing certain morpho-phonological rules to pronounce boundless of features as various morphemes, it is proposed that the clitic is a spell-out of this bundle of features, resulting in the [CLi+NPi] pattern.
References
[1] Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive Cyclicity, Anti-Locality, and Adposition Stranding. Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut.

[2] Anagnostopolou, Elena. 2006. Clitic Doubling. In: Everaert, M. – van Riemsdijek, H., eds. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volume 1. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 519–581.

[3] Belletti, Adriana. 1988. The Case of Unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19(1), pp. 1–34.

[4] Bergen, Benjamin – Plauché, Madelaine. 2001. Voilà voilà: Extensions of Deictic Constructions in French. In: Cienki, A. et al., eds. Conceptual and Discourse Factors in Linguistic Structure. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 238–249.

[5] Bošković, Željko. 2008. What Will You Have, DP or NP? In: Elfner, E. – Walkow M., eds. Proceedings of the NELS 37. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, pp. 101–114.

[6] Bošković, Željko. 2009. Unifying First and Last Conjunct Agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27(3), pp. 455–496. | DOI 10.1007/s11049-009-9072-6

[7] Creissels, Denis. 2015. Copulas Originating from See/Look Verbs in Mande Languages. Talk presented at the symposium Areal Patterns of Grammaticalization and Cross-Linguistic Variation in Grammaticalization Scenarios, University of Mainz, March 2015.

[8] Franks, Steven. 2009. Macedonian Pronominal Clitics as Object Agreement Markers. In: Franks, Steven et al., eds. A linguist's linguist: Studies in South Slavic linguistics in Honour of E. Wayles Browne. Bloomington: Slavica Publications, pp. 189–222.

[9] Halle, Morris – Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In: Hale, K. – Keyser, S. J., eds. The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 111–176.

[10] Harizanov, Boris. to appear. Word Formation at the Syntax-Morphology Interface: Denominal Adjectives in Bulgarian. Linguistic Inquiry.

[11] Hill, Virginia. 2008. Pragmatic Markers as Syntactic Heads: A Case Study from Romanian. In: Grohmann, K. – Panagiotidis, P., eds. Syntaxfest Cyprus Conference. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge University Scholars Press, pp. 237–265.

[12] Joseph, Brian D. 1981. On the Synchrony and Diachrony of Modern Greek na. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, pp. 139–154.

[13] Joseph, Brian D. 1994. On Weak Subjects and Pro-Drop in Greek. In: Phillppaki Warburton, I. et al., eds. Themes in Greek Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 21–32.

[14] Kallulli, Dalina. 2000. Direct Object Clitic Doubling in Albanian and Greek. In: Rivero, M. L. – Ralli, A., eds. Comparative Syntax of Balkan Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 127–160.

[15] Kandel, Margaret C. 2015. ECCO Location: The Italian Presentative ecco and Its Spatial Interpretation. BA thesis, University of Yale.

[16] Kandel, Margaret C. 2015. Ecco-Location. BA thesis, Yale University.

[17] Kechagias, Axiotis. 2011. A New Look at Clitic Doubling in Standard Modern Greek. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics (UCLWPL) 23, pp. 138–165.

[18] Kramer, Ruth. 2014. Clitic Doubling or Object Agreement: The View from Amharic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(2), pp. 593–634. | DOI 10.1007/s11049-014-9233-0

[19] Lasnik, Howard. 1996. Case and Expletives: Notes Toward a Parametric Account. In: Freidin, R., ed. Current Issues in Comparative Grammar. Amsterdam: Springer Netherlands, pp. 162–189.

[20] Manfredi, Stefano. 2014. Demonstratives in a Bedouin Arabic Dialect of Western Sudan. Folia Orientalia 51, pp. 27–50.

[21] Marantz, Alec. 2000. Case and Licensing. In: Reuland, Eric J. ed. Arguments and Case: Explaining Burzio's Generalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 11–30.

[22] Marušič, Franc – Nevins, Andrew – Badecker, Bill. 2015. The Grammars of Conjunction Agreement in Slovenian, Syntax 18(1), pp. 39–77. | DOI 10.1111/synt.12025

[23] Migdalski, Krzysztof. 2016. Head directionality in Old Slavic. Talk presented at the FDSL 12, Humboldt University in Berlin, December 2016.

[24] Morin, Yves Charles. 1985. On the Two French Subjectless Verbs voici and voilà. Language 61(4), pp. 777–820. | DOI 10.2307/414490

[25] Porhiel, Sylvie. 2012. The Presentative voici/voilà – Towards a Pragmatic Definition. Journal of Pragmatics 44, pp. 435–452. | DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.001

[26] Tsakali, Vina – Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2008. Rethinking the Clitic Doubling Parameter: The Inverse Correlation Between Clitic Doubling and Participle Agreement. In: Kallulli, Dalina – Tasmowski, Liliana, eds. Clitic Doubling in the Balkan Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 321–357.

[27] Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2014. Here's Puzzle: ecco. Talk presented at the NYU Syntax Brown Bag Lunch Series, New York.

[28] Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2015. Ecco un enigma: The Structure of Presentatives. In: Abstracts Booklet of 41st Incontro di Grammatica Generativa.