In communication, the mental and physical qualities get put into language. While the former can be ascribed to their bearers in the subject-use, the ascription of the latter is only possible in the object-use. The two ways of ascribing are very different, based on diverse epistemic capacities, and there is a unilateral dependency relation between them. The text raises the question whether these conditions imply some consequences for semiology.
subject-use and object-use of predicates; language sign theory; P. F. Strawson; E. Husserl; M. Frank
[1] Derrida, Jacques (1993): La Voix et le Phénomène, Paris, PUF, Quadrige.
[2] Frank, Manfred (1986): Die Unhintergehbarkeit von Individualität, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
[3] Frank, Manfred (1984): Was ist Neostrukturalismus?, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag.
[4] Frank, Manfred (1991): Selbstbewusstseinstheorien. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp Verlag.
[5] Husserl, Edmund (1993a): Logische Unersuchungen. Prolegomena zur reinen Logik, Tübingen, Max Niemeyer Verlag.
[6] Husserl, Edmund (1993b): Logische Untersuchungen, II/1, Tübingen, Max Niemeyer Verlag.
[7] Rubáš, Michal (2017): Derrida und Saussure aus der hermeneutischen Perspektive als Ausgangspunkt für die Schlichtung eines diskurssemantischen Streites, in: Brünner Beiträge zur Germanistik und Nordistik 31 / 2017 / 2, Brno, Masarykova Univerzita.
[8] Strawson, Peter Frederick (1974): Subject and Predicate in Logic and Grammar, London, Methuen.
[9] Strawson, Peter Frederick (1959): Individuals, An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, New York, Routledge.
[10] Strawson, Peter Frederick (1992): Analysis and Metaphysics, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
[11] Tugendhat, E. (1979): Selbstbewußtsein und Selbstbestimmung, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag.