Procopius's Sibyl - the fall of Vitigis and the Ostrogoths

Author: Kovács, Tamás
Source document: Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2019, vol. 24, iss. 2, pp. 113-124
Extent
113-124
  • ISSN
    1803-7402 (print)
    2336-4424 (online)
Type
Article
Language
English
Abstract(s)
The monumental work of Procopius on Justinian's wars includes two Sibylline oracles. As is often the case, the oracles are ambiguous; however, it is precisely this feature that helps to reveal their real meaning. As a consequence, the oracles can also aid researchers in understanding the basis of Byzantine political thought. This essay discusses the connotations of the Sibylline oracle in 537 through classical text analysis, revealing that Procopius used archaic ethnonyms and royal titles to draw a parallel between the fall of the Kingdom of Lydia and the Ostrogothic Kingdom. Using this framework, Procopius stresses that in 410, Alaric committed the original crime by abducting Galla Placidia; however, Vitigis and his wife Matasuntha were the ones who atoned for this sin in 540.
Document
References:
[1] Bennett, J. (2001). Trajan: Optimus Princeps (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

[2] Bury, J. B. (1896). Nugae Procopianae . Hermathena, 9(22), 358–361.

[3] Gillmeister, A. (2015). Cultural paraphrase in Roman religion in the age of Augustus. The case of the Sibyl and the Sibylline books . Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 55(1–4), 211–222.

[4] Keskiaho, J. (2013). Re-visiting the Libri Sibyllini: Some Remarks on Their Nature in Roman Legend and Experience . In M. Kajava (Ed.), Studies in Ancient Oracles and Divination. Roma: Institutum Romanum Finlandiae.

[5] Kim, L. Y. (2010). Homer between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[6] Morrison, J. V. (1997). Kerostasia, The Dictates of Fate, and the Will of Zeus in the Iliad . Arethusa, 30(2), 276–296. | DOI 10.1353/are.1997.0008

[7] Pratt, L. H. (1993). Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

[8] Steinacher, R. (2013). Who Is the Barbarian? Considerations on the Vandal Royal Title . In W. Pohl (Ed.), Post-Roman Transitions: Christian and Barbarian Identities in the Early Medieval West (pp. 437–485). Turnhout: Brepols.

[9] Wenskus, R. (1961). Stammesbildung und Verfassung. Das Werden der frühmittelalterlichen Gentes . Köln: Böhlau.

[10] Wolfram, H. (1990). History of the Goths (2nd ed.). Berkeley – Los Angeles – London: University of California Press.