Article
| Title: | "Komentář" Anselma z Canterbury k Aristotelovým kategoriím |
| Variant title: | Anselm of Canterbury's commentary to Aristotle's Categories |
| Author: | |
| Source document: | Pro-Fil. 2019, vol. 20, iss. 2, pp. 15-29 |
| Extent: | 15-29 |
| ISSN: | 1212-9097 (online) |
| DOI: | 10.5817/pf19-2-1921 |
| Type: | Article (Czech) |
| Stable URL: | http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/141791 |
| License: | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International |
PDF
Abstract(s):
Studie se věnuje dialogu Anselma z Canterbury De grammatico. Tento spis byl samotným autorem označen jako úvod do dialektiky. V dobové dialektice zastával klíčové místo Aristotelův spis Kategorie. Tento článek se proto pokouší interpretovat Anselmův dialog jako určitou pedagogicky koncipovanou podobu komentáře k Aristotelovým Kategoriím. V návaznosti na Anselmův spis jsou postupně představeny jednotlivé teze z Aristotelových Kategorií (jak tzv. antepredicamenta, tak pojednání o substanci, kvalitě a částečně i vlastnictví) a způsob, jakým s nimi Anselm pracoval.
The paper deals with the dialogue De grammatico written by Anselm of Canterbury. The author of the dialogue himself described the work as an introduction to dialectics. In that epoch, the leading role in the given art belonged to Aristotle's Categories. As a result, the article aims to interpret Anselm's dialogue as a commentary to Aristotle's Categories conceived in a pedagogic form. Following Anselm's treatise, the paper analyses particular theses from the Categories (firstly the so-called antepredicamenta, then the categories of substance, quality, and partly also having) and the approach Anselm employed in working with them.
The paper deals with the dialogue De grammatico written by Anselm of Canterbury. The author of the dialogue himself described the work as an introduction to dialectics. In that epoch, the leading role in the given art belonged to Aristotle's Categories. As a result, the article aims to interpret Anselm's dialogue as a commentary to Aristotle's Categories conceived in a pedagogic form. Following Anselm's treatise, the paper analyses particular theses from the Categories (firstly the so-called antepredicamenta, then the categories of substance, quality, and partly also having) and the approach Anselm employed in working with them.
Keywords:
Anselm z Canterbury; Aristotelés; kategorie; substance; kvalita
Anselm of Canterbury; Aristotle; categories; substance; quality
Anselm of Canterbury; Aristotle; categories; substance; quality
Note:
Studie vznikla v rámci projektu č. SGS08/FF/2018-2019 Normy a hodnoty ve středověké společnosti, řešeném na Ostravské univerzitě.
References:
[1] Alcuinus, Flaccus Albinus Eboracensis (1863): De dialectica, in Patrologia Latina 101, J. P. Migne, 949–976.
[2] Allen, R. E. (1969): Individual Properties in Aristotle's Categories, Phronesis 14(1), 31–39, dostupné z ˂ https://www.jstor.org/stable/4181823 ˃.
[3] Anselmus Cantuariensis (1946a): De grammatico, in Schmitt, F. S. (ed.) S. Anselmi Cantuariensis archiepiscopi opera omnia, vol. I, Thomas Nelson & Son, 145–168.
[4] Anselmus Cantuariensis (1946b): De veritate, in Schmitt, F. S. (ed.) S. Anselmi Cantuariensis archiepiscopi opera omnia, vol. I, Thomas Nelson & Son, 173–199.
[5] Anselmus Cantuariensis (1946c): Epistolarum liber primus: Epistolae quas prior Beccensis scripsit, in Schmitt, F. S. (ed.) S. Anselmi Cantuariensis archiepiscopi opera omnia, vol. III, Thomas Nelson & Son, 97–294.
[6] Anselmus Cantuariensis (1949): Epistolarum liber secundus: Epistolae quas archiepiscopus Cantuariensis scripsit; pars prima, in Schmitt, F. S. (ed.) S. Anselmi Cantuariensis archiepiscopi opera omnia, vol. IV, Thomas Nelson & Son.
[7] Archambault, J. (2016): Anselm's De grammatico: structure, sources, pedagogical context, 2016-10-26 [cit. 2019-05-18], dostupné z ˂ https://www.academia.edu/29445989/Anselms_De_grammatico_structure_sources_pedagogical_context ˃.
[8] Aristotelés (1961): Liber Aristotelis De decem praedicamentis (Categoriae [vel Praedicamenta], translatio Boethii, in L. Minio-Paluello (ed.) Aristoteles Latinus, I/1–5: Categoriae vel Praedicamenta, Desclée de Brouwer, 5–41.
[9] Bäck, A. T. (2000): Aristotle's Theory of Predication, Brill.
[10] Boethius (1847): In Categorias Aristotelis libri quatuor, in Patrologia Latina 64, J.-P. Migne, 159–294.
[11] Boethius (1906): In Isagogen Porphyrii commentorum editionis primae, in G. Schepps – S. Brandt (eds.) In Isagogen Porphyrii commenta, Tempsky – Freytag, 3–132.
[12] Boschung, P. (2006): From a Topical Point of View. Dialectic in Anselm of Canterbury's De Grammatico, Brill.
[13] Cassiodorus (1961): Cassiodori Senatoris Institutiones, Clarendon Press.
[14] Cerezo, M. (2015): Anselm of Canterbury's Theory of Meaning: Analysis of Some Semantic Distinctions in De Grammatico, Vivarium 53(2–4), 194–220, dostupné z ˂ https://www.jstor.org/stable/24775486 ˃.
[15] De Rijk, L. M. (1959): Introduction, in Garlandus Compotista, Dialectica, Van Gorcum, IX–LXIV.
[16] Duerlinger, J. (1970): Predication and Inherence in Aristotle's Categories, Phronesis 15(2), 175–203, dostupné z ˂ https://www.jstor.org/stable/4181850 ˃. | DOI 10.1163/156852870X00134
[17] Eadmerus Cantuariensis (1972): The Life of St Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury / Vita sancti Anselmi, Clarendon Press.
[18] Galonnier, A. (1987): Le De grammatico et l'origine de la théorie des propriétés des termes, in Jolivet, J. – de Libera, A. (eds.) Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains: aux origines de la Logica modernorum, Bibliopolis, 353–375.
[19] Galonnier, A. (1996): Sur quelques aspects annonciateurs de la littérature sophismatique dans le De grammatico, in Luscombe, D. E. – Evans, G. R. (eds.) Anselm: Aosta, Bec and Canterbury. Papers in Commemoration of the Nine-Hundreth Anniversary of Anselm's Enthronement as Archbishop, Sheffield Academic Press, 209–228.
[20] Gambra, J. S. (2015): To Be in a Subject and Accident, Vivarium 53(2–4), 170–193, dostupné z ˂ https://www.jstor.org/stable/24775485 ˃.
[21] Garlandus Compotista (1959): Dialectica, Van Gorcum.
[22] Gasper, G. E. M. (2004): Anselm of Canterbury and his Theological Inheritance, Ashgate.
[23] Henry, D. P. (1958): Why 'grammaticus'?, Alma 25, 165–180, dostupné z ˂ http://documents.irevues.inist.fr/bitstream/handle/2042/3099/04%20TEXTE.pdf ˃.
[24] Henry, D. P. (1964): The De Grammatico of St. Anselm. The theory of Paronymy, The University of Notre Dame Press.
[25] Henry, D. P. (1967): The Logic of Saint Anselm, Oxford University Press.
[26] Henry, D. P. (1974): Commentary on De Grammatico. The Historical-Logical Dimensions of a Dialogue of St. Anselm's, D. Reidel Publishing.
[27] Isidorus Hispalensis (1911): Isidori Hispalensis Episcopi Etymologiarum sive Originum libri XX, Clarendon Press.
[28] King, P. (2004): Anselm's philosophy of language, in Davies, B. – Leftow, B. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Anselm, Cambridge University Press, 84–110.
[29] Lewis, F. A. (1991): Substance and Predication in Aristotle, Cambridge University Press.
[30] Lewry, O. (1981): Boethian Logic in the Medieval West, in Gibson, M. (ed.) Boethius. His Life, Thought and Influence, Blackwell, 90–134.
[31] Marenbon, J. (1996): Medieval Latin Commentaries and Glosses on Aristotelian Logical Texts, Before c. 1150 AD, in Burnett, C. (ed.) Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts. The Syriac, Arabic and Medieval Latin Traditions, The Warburg Institute, 77–127.
[32] Marenbon, J. (2002): Some Semantic Problems in Anselm's De grammatico, in Heren, M. W. – McDonough, C. J. – Artur, R. G. (eds.) Latin Culture in the Eleventh Century, Brepols, 73–86.
[33] McCord Adams, M. (2000): Re-reading De grammatico or Anslem's introduction to Aristotle's Categories, Documenti e sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 11, 83–112.
[34] Novikoff, A. J. (2011): Anselm, Dialogue, and the Rise of Scholastic Disputations, Speculum 86(2), 387–418, dostupné z ˂ https://www.jstor.org/stable/41105591 ˃. | DOI 10.1017/S0038713410004690
[35] Perin, C. (2007): Substantial Universals in Aristotle's Catogories, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33, 125–143 dostupné z ˂ http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.534.3831&rep=rep1&type=pdf˃.
[36] Porphyre (1998): Isagoge. Texte grec, Translatio Boethii, Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.
[37] Priscianus Caesariensis (1855): Prisciani Institutionum grammaticarum libri I – XII, Teubner.
[38] Richer von Saint-Remi (2000): Historiae, MGH SS 38, Hahn.
[39] Sharpe, R. (2009): Anselm as Author: Publishing in the Late Eleventh Century, The Journal of Medieval Latin 19, 1–87, dostupné z ˂ https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/pdf/10.1484/J.JML.1.100545 ˃. | DOI 10.1484/J.JML.1.100545
[40] Shimizu, T. (1996): Alcuin's Theory of Signification and System of Philosophy, Didascalia 2, 1–18.
[41] Southern, R. W. (1990): Saint Anselm. A Portrait in a Landscape, Cambridge University Press.
[42] Sweeney, E. C. (2012): Anselm of Canterbury and the Desire for the Word, The Catholic University of America Press.
[43] Viola, C. E. (1993): Lanfranc de Pavie et Anselme d'Aosta, in d'Onofrio, G. (ed.) Lanfranco di Pavia e l'Europa del secolo XI, Herder editrice e libreria, 531–594.
[44] Viola, C. E. (1996): Authority and Reason in Saint Anselm's Life and Thought, in Anselm: Aosta, Bec and Canterbury. Papers in Commemoration of the Nine-Hundreth Anniversary of Anselm's Enthronement as Archbishop, Sheffield Academic Press, 172–208.
[45] Visser, S. – Williams, T. (2009): Anselm, Oxford University Press.
