[1] Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S.-y., Reznitskaya, A., Tillmanns, M., & Gilbert, L. (2001).
The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 1–46. |
DOI 10.1207/S1532690XCI1901_1
[2] Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). New York: Longman.
[3] Asher, S. R., Hymel, S., & Wigfield, A. (1978).
Influence of topic interest on children's reading comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 10(1), 35–47. |
DOI 10.1080/10862967809547253
[4] Chambliss, M. J., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Fourth and fifth graders representing the argument structure in written texts. Discourse Processes, 34(1), 91–115.
[5] Chinn, A. C., Duncan, R. G., Hung, L. C.-C., & Rinehart, R. W. (2016). Epistemic criteria and reliable processes as indicators of argument quality in science students' argumentation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
[6] Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Belmont: Wadsworth.
[8] Ennis, R. (1996). Critical thinking. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
[9] Ennis, R. (2003). Critical thinking assessment. In D. Fasko (Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning (pp. 293–313). Cresskill: Hampton Press, Inc.
[10] Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004).
TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. |
DOI 10.1002/sce.20012
[11] Ferretti, R. P., & Fan, Y. (2016). Argumentative writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research, Second edition. New York: Guilford Press.
[12] Fischer, F., Chinn, C. A., Engelmann, K., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (2018). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: The roles of domain-specific and domain-general knowledge. New York: Routledge.
[14] Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., Lee, C.D., Shanahan, C., & Project, R. (2016).
Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246. |
DOI 10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
[15] Govier, T. (1987). Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Providence: Foris.
[16] Govier, T. (2010). A practical study of argument. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
[17] Graff, G. (2003). Clueless in academe. New Haven: Yale University Press.
[18] Halpern, D. F. (2003). The "how" and "why" of critical thinking assessment. In D. Fasko (Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning (pp. 331–354). Cresskill: Hampton Press, Inc.
[19] Healy, P. (1987).
Critical reasoning and dialectical argument: An extension of Toulmin's approach. Informal Logic, 9(1), 1–12. |
DOI 10.22329/il.v9i1.2654
[20] Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 191–209.
[21] Hollihan, T. A., & Baaske, K. T. (1973). Arguments and arguing: The products of human decision making. Prospect Hights: Waveland.
[22] Hughes, J. N. (1992). Review of the Cornell critical thinking tests. In J. J. Kramer, J. C. Conoley & L. L. Murphy (Eds.), The eleventh mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
[23] Johnson, K. M., (2005). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests fourth edition forms S and T. In B. S. Plake & R. A. Spies (Eds.), The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook (Vol. 16). Lincoln: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
[24] Klahr, D., Zimmerman, C., & Jirout, J. (2011).
Educational interventions to advance children's scientific thinking. Science, 333(6045), 971–975. |
DOI 10.1126/science.1204528
[25] Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016).
A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. |
DOI 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
[26] Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[27] Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Boston: Harvard Education Press.
[28] Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011).
Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents' thinking. Psychological Science, 22(4), 545–552. |
DOI 10.1177/0956797611402512
[29] Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (2016). Argue with me: Argument as a path to developing students' thinking and writing. New York: Routledge.
[30] Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[31] MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K. & Dreyer, L. G. (2002). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests. Rolling Meadows: Riverside Publishing.
[32] Mason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006).
Prediction of students' argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 492–509. |
DOI 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.007
[33] McCabe, P. P. (2005). Review of the Gates-MacGinitie reading tests. In R. A. Spies & B. S. Plake (Eds.), The Sixteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Lincoln: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
[34] Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996).
Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14(2), 139–178. |
DOI 10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1
[36] National Governors Association. (2010). Common core state standards: Appendix A. research supporting key elements of the standards. Washington DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
[37] Newell, G. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., VanDerHeide, J., Kuhn, D., & Andriessen, J. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 273–304.
[38] Nielsen, J. A. (2013).
Dialectical features of students' argumentation: A critical review of argumentation studies in science education. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 371–393. |
DOI 10.1007/s11165-011-9266-x
[39] Norris, S. P. (1995). Format effects on critical thinking test performance. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 41(4), 378–406.
[40] Norris, S. P., Leighton, J. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2004).
What is at stake in knowing the content and capabilities of children's minds? A case for basing high stakes tests on cognitive models. Theory & Research in Social Education, 2(3), 283–308. |
DOI 10.1177/1477878504046524
[41] Nussbaum, E. M. (2011).
Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling: Alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education. Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 84–106. |
DOI 10.1080/00461520.2011.558816
[42] Nussbaum, E. M., & Bendixen, L. D. (2003).
Approaching and avoiding arguments: The role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 573–595. |
DOI 10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00062-0
[43] Nussbaum, E. M., & Kardash, C. M. (2005).
The effects of goal instruction and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 9(2), 157–169. |
DOI 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.157
[44] Nussbaum, E. M., & Ordene, V. (2011).
Critical questions and argument stratagems: A framework for enhancing and analyzing students' reasoning practices The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 443–488. |
DOI 10.1080/10508406.2011.564567
[45] Oka, E. R., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Patterns of motivation and reading skill in underachieving children. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (pp. 115–145). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[46] Page-Voth, V., & Graham, S. (1999).
Effects of goal setting and strategy use on the writing performance and self-efficacy of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 230–240. |
DOI 10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.230
[48] Phillips, L. M., & Patterson, C. C. (1987). Test of inference ability in reading comprehension. Newfoundland: Institute for Educational Research and Development.
[49] Poteet, J. (1989). Review of the Ennis-Weir critical thinking essay test. J. C. Conoley & J. J. Kramer (Eds.), The tenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 289–290). Lincoln: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
[50] Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2013).
What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 483–520. |
DOI 10.3102/0034654313487606
[51] Renninger, K. A., Suzanne Hidi, & Krapp, A. (Eds.). (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[52] Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., Dong, T., Li, Y., Kim, I., & Kim, S. (2008). Learning to think well: Application of argument schema theory. In C. C. Block & S. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 196–213). New York: Guilford Press.
[53] Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S. (2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Processes, 32(2 & 3), 155–175.
[54] Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013).
Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 114–133. |
DOI 10.1080/00461520.2013.775898
[55] Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L., Clark, A., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2009).
Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 29–48. |
DOI 10.1080/03057640802701952
[56] Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L., Glina, M., & Anderson, R. C. (2009).
Measuring argumentative reasoning: What's behind the numbers? Learning and individual differences, 19(2), 219–224. |
DOI 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.001
[57] Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2015). Professional development in dialogic teaching: Helping teachers promote argument literacy in their classrooms. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), Sage handbook of learning (pp. 219–232). London: Sage Publications.
[58] Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2017). The most reasonable answer: Helping students build better arguments together. Boston: Harvard Education Press.
[59] Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99–136). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
[61] Stein, N. L., & Trabasso, T. (1982). Children's understanding of stories: A basis for moral judgment and dilemma resolution. In C. J. Brainerd & M. Pressley (Eds.), Verbal processes in children: Progress in cognitive development research (pp. 161–188). New York: Springer-Verlag.
[62] Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(4), 1–19.
[63] Sutton, R. E. (1992). Review of the New Jersey test of reasoning skills. In J. J. Kramer, J. C. Conoley & L. L. Murphy (Eds.), The eleventh mental measurements yearbook (pp. 606–608). Lincoln: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
[64] Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[65] Walton, D. (1998). The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
[66] Weinstock, M. P., Neuman, Y., & Glassner, A. (2006).
Identification of informal reasoning fallacies as a function of epistemological level, grade level, and cognitive ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 327–341. |
DOI 10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.327
[67] Wilkinson, I. A. G., Reznitskaya, A., Bourdage, K., Oyler, J., Nelson, K., Glina, M., Drewry, R., Kim, M.-Y. (2017).
Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: Changing teachers' beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms. Language & Education, 31(1), 65–82. |
DOI 10.1080/09500782.2016.1230129
[68] Wolfe, C. R., Britt, M. A., & Butler, J. A. (2009).
Argumentation schema and the my side bias in written argumentation. Written Communication, 26(2), 183–209. |
DOI 10.1177/0741088309333019