The paper is an outcome of a research project Divadlo jako syntéza umění: Otakar Zich v kontextu moderní vědy a dnešní potenciál jeho konceptů / Theatre as Synthesis of Arts: Otakar Zich in Context of Modern Science and Actual Potential of His Concepts (GAČR 2016-2018, GA16-20335S).
[1] AMBROS, Veronika. 2011. Puppets, Statues, Men, Objects, and the Prague School. Theatralia 2 (2011): 74–88.
[2] AMBROS, Veronika. 2012. Petr Bogatyrev (1893–1971) et E. F. Burian (1904–1959): Entre Formalisme et Structuralisme, entre Ethnographie et Sémiotique du Théâtre. In Sergei Tschougounnikov and Celine Trautmann-Walter (eds.). Petr Bogatyrev et les Débuts du Cercle de Prague. Recherches Ethnographiques et Theatrales. Paris: Sorbonne Nouvelle, 2012: 135–146.
[3] BOGATYREV, Petr. 1982. A Contribution to the Study of Theatrical Signs. In Peter Steiner (ed.) and John Burbank (transl.). The Prague School: Selected Writings, 1929–1946. Austin: Texas UP, 1982: 55–64.
[4] BOGATYREV, Petr. 2016. Theatrical Signs. In David Drozd, Tomáš Kačer and Don Sparling (eds.). Theatre Theory Reader: Prague School Writings. Prague: Karolinum Press, 2016: 99–114.
[5] BRUŠÁK, Karel. 1991. Imaginary Action Space in Drama. In Herta Schmid and Hedwig Král (eds.). Drama und Theater: Theorie – Methode – Geschichte. München: Otto Sagner, 1991: 144–162.
[6] BURJANEK, Josef. 1966. Otakar Zich. Brno: St. pedag. nakl., 1966.
[7] DROZD, David, Tomáš KAČER and Don SPARLING (eds.). 2016. Theatre Theory Reader: Prague School Writings. Prague: Karolinum Press, 2016.
[8] DROZD, David. 2010. Chybějící část recepce Zichova opus magnum [The Missing Part of the Reception of Zich's Opus Magnum]. Theatralia 13 (2010): 2: 214–218.
[9] ELAM, Keir. 2002. The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama. 2nd ed. London/New York: Routledge, 2002.
[10] HONZL, Jindřich. 1940. Objevené divadlo v lidovém divadle českém a slovenském [Discovered Theatre in Czech and Slovak Folk Theatre]. Slovo a slovesnost 6 (1940): 2: 107–111.
[11] HONZL, Jindřich. 2016. The Mobility of the Theatrical Sign. In David Drozd, Tomáš Kačer and Don Sparling (eds.). Theatre Theory Reader: Prague School Writings. Prague: Karolinum Press, 2016: 129–146.
[12] JAKOBSON, Roman. 1985. Peter Bogatyrev, (29.1.93–18.VIII.71). Expert in Transfiguration. Selected Writings, VII, Berlin, NY, Amsterdam: Mouton, 1985: 293–304.
[13] JAKOBSON, Roman. 1987a. An Open Letter from Roman Jakobson to Jiří Voskovec and Jan Werich on the Epistemology and Semantics of Fun. Transl. by M. Quinn. Stanford Slavic Studies (1987): 1: 155–162.
[14] JAKOBSON, Roman. 1987b. On Realism in Art. In Krystyna Pomorska and Stephen Rudy (eds.). Language in Literature. Cambridge, Mass./London: Harvard UP, 1987: 19–28.
[15] MEERZON, Yana. 2005. The Path of a Character: Michael Chekhov's Inspired Acting and Theatre Semiotics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2005.
[16] MUKAŘOVSKÝ, Jan. 1933. Otakar Zich: Estetika dramatického umění (recenze) [Otakar Zich: The Aesthetics of Dramatic Art (review)]. Časopis pro moderní filologii a literaturu XIX (1933): 318–326.
[17] MUKAŘOVSKÝ, Jan. 1940. Dialog a Monolog [Dialogue and Monologue]. Listy Filologické / Folia Philologica 67 (1940): 3/4: 139–160.
[18] MUKAŘOVSKÝ, Jan. 1978. Time in Film. In John Burbank and Peter Steiner (transl. and eds.). Structure, Sign, and Function. Selected Essays. New Haven/London: Yale University Press, 1978: 191–200.
[19] MUKAŘOVSKÝ, Jan. 1982. Otakar Zich. In Jan Mukařovský. Studie z poetiky. Prague: Odeon, 1982: 284–289.
[20] MUKAŘOVSKÝ, Jan. 2016a. An Attempt at a Structural Analysis of an Actor's Figure (Chaplin in City Lights). In David Drozd, Tomáš Kačer and Don Sparling (eds.). Theatre Theory Reader: Prague School Writings. Prague: Karolinum Press, 2016: 192–199.
[21] MUKAŘOVSKÝ, Jan. 2016b. Dialogue and Monologue. In David Drozd, Tomáš Kačer and Don Sparling (eds.). Theatre Theory Reader: Prague School Writings. Prague: Karolinum Press, 2016: 220–246.
[22] MUKAŘOVSKÝ, Jan. 2016c. On the Current State of the Theory of Theatre. In David Drozd, Tomáš Kačer and Don Sparling (eds.). Theatre Theory Reader: Prague School Writings. Prague: Karolinum Press, 2016: 59–75.
[23] NOVÁK, Bohumil. 1933. Rozhovor s Otakarem Zichem [An Interview with Otakar Zich]. Čin 4 (1933): 465–469.
[24] PRAŽÁKOVÁ, Klára. 1921. Pomyslné jeviště [Imaginary Stage]. Jeviště II (1921): 390–392.
[25] PROCHÁZKA, Miroslav. 1978. Jindřich Honzl a otázky teorie divadelního znaku. (Šestidílná studie o zkoumání sémiotických otázek v teatrologických úvahách Jindřicha Honzla) [Jindřich Honzl and Isues of the Theory of the Theatrical Sign (A Study in Six Parts of Studying Semiotic Issues in Jindřich Honzl's Inquiries in Theatre Studies]. Estetika 15 (1978): 2: 97–116.
[26] QUINN, Michael L. 1988.
Švejk's Stage Figure: Illustration, Design, and the Representation of Character. Modern Drama 31 (1988): 3: 330–339. |
DOI 10.3138/md.31.3.330
[27] QUINN, Michael L. 1990. Celebrity and the Semiotics of Acting. New Theatre Quarterly 6 (1990): 22: 154–161.
[28] QUINN, Michael L. 1995. The Semiotic Stage: Prague School Theatre Theory. New York: Peter Lang, 1995.
[29] STIEBITZ, Ferdinand. 1937. Pomyslné jeviště v antickém a v moderním dramatě [The Imaginary Stage in Classical and Modern Drama]. Věda a život (1937): 3: 229–242.
[30] SUS, Oleg, Ladislav SOLDÁN and Dušan JEŘÁBEK. Geneze sémantiky hudby a básnictví v moderní české estetice: dvě studie o Otakaru Zichovi [Development of Musical and Poetic Semantitcs in Modern Czech Aesthetics: Two Studies about Otakar Zich]. Brno: Filozofická fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, 1992.
[31] SUS, Oleg. 1972.
On the Genetic Preconditions of Czech Structuralist Semiology and Semantics. Poetics 1 (1972): 4: 28–54. |
DOI 10.1016/0304-422X(72)90003-4
[32] SZONDI, Peter. 1967. Theorie des modernen Dramas. Frankfurt am Maine: Suhrkamp, 1967.
[33] VELTRUSKÝ, Jiří. 1942. Drama jako básnické dílo [Drama as Literature]. In Bohuslav Havránek and Jan Mukařovský (eds.). Čtení o jazyce a poesii [Reading about Language and Poetry]. Prague: Družstevní práce, 1942: 403–502.
[34] VELTRUSKÝ, Jiří. 1977. Drama as Literature. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press, 1977.
[35] VELTRUSKÝ, Jiří. 1979.
Theatre in the Corridor. E. F. Burian's Production of 'Alladine and Palomides'. The Drama Review 23 (1979): 4: 67–80. |
DOI 10.2307/1145230
[36] VELTRUSKÝ, Jiří. 1999. Drama jako básnické dílo [Drama as Literature]. Brno: Host, 1999.
[37] VELTRUSKÝ, Jiří. 2016a. A Contribution to the Semiotics of Acting. In David Drozd, Tomáš Kačer and Don Sparling (eds.). Theatre Theory Reader: Prague School Writings. Prague: Karolinum Press, 2016: 376–424.
[38] VELTRUSKÝ, Jiří. 2016b. Dramatic Text as a Component of Theatre. In David Drozd, Tomáš Kačer and Don Sparling (eds.). Theatre Theory Reader: Prague School Writings. Prague: Karolinum Press, 2016: 247–268.
[39] VELTRUSKÝ, Jiří. 2016c. People and Things in the Theatre. In David Drozd, Tomáš Kačer and Don Sparling (eds.). Theatre Theory Reader: Prague School Writings. Prague: Karolinum Press, 2016: 147–156.
[40] VELTRUSKÝ, Jiří. 2016d. Strukturalismus a divadelní věda [Structuralism and Theatre Studies]. Theatralia 19 (2016): 1: 231–237.
[41] ZICH, Jaroslav. 1965. Sdělovací schopnost hudby [Communicative Abilities of Music]. Hudební věda II (1965): 31–75.
[42] ZICH, Jaroslav. 1987 [1975]. Kapitoly a studie z hudební estetiky [Chapters and Studies in the Aesthetics of Music]. Prague: Supraphon, 1987.
[43] ZICH, Otakar and Oleg SUS. 1977. Estetika dramatického umění: teoretická dramaturgie [The Aesthetics of Dramatic Art: A Theoretical Dramaturgy]. Würzburg: Jal-reprint, 1977.
[44] ZICH, Otakar. 1931. Estetika dramatického umění [The Aesthetics of Dramatic Art]. 1st ed. Prague: Melantrich, 1931.
[45] ZICH, Otakar. 1986. Estetika dramatického umění: teoretická dramaturgie [The Aesthetics of Dramatic Art: A Theoretical Dramaturgy]. 2nd ed. Prague: Panorama, 1986.
[46] ZICH, Otakar. 2015. Puppet Theatre. Transl. by Pavel Drábek. Theatralia 18 (2015): 2: 505–513.