The paper is part of the international research project "Conversation in Antiquity. Analysis of Verbal Interaction in Ancient Greek and Latin" (SI1/PJI/2019-00283), financed by the Community of Madrid.
[1] Anderson, W. S. (1983). Chalinus armiger in Plautus' Casina. Illinois Classical Studies, 8(1), 11–21.
[2] Barbiero, E. A. (2020). What's New? The Possibilities of Novelty in Plautus' Casina. In S. Papaioannou, & Ch. Demetriou (Eds.), Plautus' Erudite Comedy: New Insights into the Work of a doctus poeta (pp. 51–72). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
[3] Barrios-Lech, P. (2016). Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[4] Berger, Ł. (2016).
Introducing the first topic slot in Plautine dialogues. Roczniki Humanistyczne, 64(3), 89–110. |
DOI 10.18290/rh.2016.64.3-5
[5] Berger, Ł. (2017). The Old Man and Linguistic Politeness in the Comedies of Plautus. Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae, 27(3), 249–273.
[6] Berger, Ł. (2018). Negotiating the interactional meaning on the Roman stage: tokens of phaticity. In A. Gałkowski, & M. Kopytowska (Eds.), Current Perspectives in Semiotics. Text, Genres, and Representations (pp. 217–237). Berlin: Peter Lang.
[7] Berger, Ł. (2019). Gestión de los turnos conversacionales en Plauto y Terencio: entre el habla y los silencios. In R. López Gregoris (Ed.), Drama y dramaturgia en Roma (pp. 281–309). Zaragoza: Pórtico.
[8] Berger, Ł. (2020). Greeting in Roman Comedy: Register and (Im)politeness. Journal of Latin Linguistics, 19 (in press).
[9] Berger, Ł. (forthcoming). (Im)politeness of Interruptions in Roman Comedy.
[10] Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[11] Cabrillana, C. (2019).
Expresiones directivas con verbos de uso copulativo en la comedia latina. Glotta, 95, 8–25. |
DOI 10.13109/glot.2019.95.1.8
[12] Casinos Mora, F. J. (1999). El dualismo autoridad-potestad como fundamento de la organización y del pensamiento políticos de Roma. Polis, 11, 85–109.
[13] Cody, J. M. (1976). The 'Senex Amator' in Plautus' Casina. Hermes, 104(4), 453–476.
[14] Culpeper, J. (2011). Politeness and impoliteness. In K. Aijmer, & G. Andersen (Eds.), Pragmatics of society (Handbooks of Pragmatics, 5; pp. 391–436). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter,
[15] De Melo, W. (2011–2013). (Ed.). Plautus. Comedies (Vol. 1–5). Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.
[16] Dickey, E. (2016).
Politeness in ancient Rome: Can it help us evaluate modern politeness theories? Journal of Politeness Research, 12(2). 197–220. |
DOI 10.1515/pr-2016-0008
[17] Feltovich, A. (2015).
In Defense of Myrrhina: Friendship between Women in Plautus's Casina. Helios, 42(2), 245–266. |
DOI 10.1353/hel.2015.0010
[18] Geyer, N. (2008). Discourse and Politeness: Ambivalent Face in Japanese. New York: Continuum.
[20] Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in Public. Macrostudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.
[21] Gotter, U. (2008). Cultural differences and cross-cultural contact: Greek and Roman concepts of power. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 104, 179–230.
[22] Hall, J. (2005). Politeness and Formality in Cicero's Letter to Matius (Fam. 11.27). Museum Helveticum, 62, 193–213.
[23] Hall, J. (2009). Politeness and Politics in Cicero's Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[24] Haugh, M. (2007).
The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research, 3(2), 295–317. |
DOI 10.1515/PR.2007.013
[25] Herman, V. (1995). Dramatic discourse: Dialogue as interaction in plays. London: Routledge.
[26] Herman, V. (2002). Turn Management in Drama. In J. Culpeper, M. Short, & P. Verdonk (Eds.), Exploring the Language of Drama: from Text to Context (pp. 29–43). London – New York: Routledge.
[27] Kaster, R. (2005). Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[28] Konstan, D. (2014). Turns and Returns in Plautus's Casina. In I. N. Perysinakis, & E. Karakasis (Eds.), Plautine trends: Studies in Plautine comedy and its reception (pp. 3–11). Berlin – Boston: De Gruyter.
[29] Laver, J. (1975). Communicative function of phatic communion. In A. Kendon, R. M. Harris, & M. R. Key (Eds.), Organization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction (pp. 215–238). The Hague: Mouton.
[30] Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[31] Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell, & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 103–130). Malden – Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
[32] MacCary, W. T., & Willcock, M. M. (1976). (Eds.). Plautus: Casina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[33] McCarthy, K. (2000). Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[34] Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[35] Mills, S. (2011). Discursive approaches to politeness and impoliteness. In Linguistic Politeness Research Group (Eds.), Discursive approaches to Politeness (pp. 19–56). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
[36] Moore, T. J. (1998). The Theater of Plautus: Playing to the Audience. Austin: University of Texas Press.
[37] Müller, R. (1997). Sprechen und Sprache. Dialoglinguistische Studien zu Terenz. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
[38] O'Bryhim, S. (1989).
The Originality of Plautus' Casina. The American Journal of Philology, 110(1), 81–103. |
DOI 10.2307/294954
[39] O'Connell, D. C., Kowal, S., & Kaltenbacher, E. (1990).
Turn-taking: A critical analysis of the research tradition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19(6), 345–373. |
DOI 10.1007/BF01068884
[40] Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2005).
Managing adversarial questioning in broadcast interviews. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(2), 193–217. |
DOI 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.193
[41] Rei, A. (2005). Villains, wives, and slaves in the comedies of Plautus. In S. R. Joshel, & S. Murnaghan (Eds.), Women and slaves in Greco-Roman culture: differential equations (pp. 104–120). New York: Routledge.
[42] Ridealgh, K., & Unceta Gómez, L. (forthcoming). Potestas and the language of power: Conceptualising an approach to Power and Discernment politeness in ancient languages. Journal of Pragmatics.
[43] Risselada, R. (1994). Modo and sane, or what to do with particles in Latin directives. In J. Herman (Ed.), Linguistic Studies on Latin: Selected papers from the 6th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics (Budapest, 23–27 March 1991) (pp. 319–343). Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
[44] Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974).
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. |
DOI 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
[45] Schegloff, E. A. (1986).
The routine as achievement. Human studies, 9(2), 111–151. |
DOI 10.1007/BF00148124
[46] Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Between micro and macro: Contexts and other connections. In J. C. Alexander (Ed.), The micro-macro link (pp. 207–234). Berkley – Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.
[47] Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[48] Stewart, R. (2012). Plautus and Roman Slavery. Malden – Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
[49] Unceta Gómez, L. (2018). Gli studi sulla (s)cortesia linguistica in latino. Possibilità di analisi e proposte per il futuro. Studi e Saggi Linguistici, 56(2), 9–37.
[50] Unceta Gómez, L. (2019).
Conceptualizations of linguistic politeness in Latin: the emic perspective. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 20(2), 286–312. |
DOI 10.1075/jhp.00033.gom
[51] Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[52] Zebrino, M. C. (2013). Taceo in Plauto: quando dire non è fare. Rationes rerum, 1, 115–147.