Манипулятивный потенциал метаязыковых операторов в российском политическом дискурсе

Variant title
Manipuljativnyj potencial metajazykovych operatorov v rossijskom političeskom diskurse
Manipulative potential of metalanguage operators in Russian political discourse
Source document: Новая русистика. 2020, vol. 13, iss. 2, pp. 29-41
Extent
29-41
  • ISSN
    1803-4950 (print)
    2336-4564 (online)
Type
Article
Language
Russian
License: Not specified license
Abstract(s)
In the contemporary Russian political discourse, various types of metalanguage operators are used, which increase the expressiveness and emotionality of a politician's speech, enhancing the pragmatic effect on the audience. The author investigates the manipulative potential of metalanguage operators in contemporary Russian political discourse. The research material was collected from transcripts of public speeches of leading Russian politicians—V. Putin and D. Medvedev. The author comes to the conclusion, that the main methods of intensifying the manipulative potential by using metalanguage operators in the political discourse are: 1) appeal to the recipient's experience; 2) an indication of the level of education and professional competence of the politician; 3) an indication of the sincerity and honesty of the politician; 4) mitigation of speech aggression; 5) expression of subjective assessment. The study showed that politicians often use metalanguage operators to comment and interpret proverbs and sayings, borrowed words and expressions, new and obsolete words, as well as jargon, argo and rude words.
Document
References:
[1] BACHTIN, M. M. (1979): Èstetika slovesnogo tvorčestva . Moskva.

[2] BULYGINA, T. V., ŠMELEV, A. D. (1999): Čelovek o jazyke (metajazykovaja refleksija v nelingvističeskich tekstach) . In: Logičeskij analiz jazyka. Obraz čeloveka v kul'ture i jazyke. Moskva, s. 146−161.

[3] FJODOROV, A. I. (2008): Frazeologičeskij slovar' russkogo literaturnogo jazyka . Moskva.

[4] GORINA, Je. V. (2015): Diskursivnaja model' interneta. I zvestija Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Serija 1. Problemy obrazovanija, nauki i kul'tury, 2015, № 2 (138), s. 22–30.

[5] CHLEBDA, V. (1999): Šest' soobraženij po voprosu o jazykovom samosoznanii . In: Rusistika. Sankt-Peterburg, s. 62–67.

[6] LUK'JANOVA, N. A. (1986): Èkspressivnaja leksika razgovornogo upotreblenija: Problemy semantiki . Novosibirsk.

[7] LUTOVINOVA, O. V. (2009): Lingvokul'turologičeskije charakteristiki virtual'nogo diskursa . Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanije učenoj stepeni doktora filologičeskich nauk. Volgograd.

[8] MAKAROVA, Je. L. (1994): Obučenije sredstvam metakommunikacii v argumentirujuščem diskurse (nemeckij jazyk) . Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanije učenoj stepeni kandidata pedagogičeskich nauk. Moskva.

[9] Pravitel'stvo Rossii . Oficial'nyj sajt. http://government.ru/. [online]. [cit. 30. 4. 2020].

[10] Prezident Rossii . http://kremlin.ru/. [online]. [cit. 30. 4. 2020].

[11] RYČEVA, Je. A., SOROKA, S. S. (2019): Manipuljativnyje strategii i taktiki v reči rossijskich i češskich pravych politikov v internet-kommunikacii . In: MELIKJAN, V. Ju. (ed.): Jazyk i pravo: aktualnyje problemy vzaimodejstvija. Vypusk 9. Rostov-na-Donu, s. 71–81.

[12] SEDOV, K. F. (2005): Rečevaja agressija v povsednevnoj kommunikacii . In: Sbornik Rečevaja agressija v sovremennoj kul'ture. Čeljabinsk, s. 32−37.

[13] ŠEJGAL, Je. I. (2002): Refleksivy v političeskoj kommunikacii . In: Mežvuzovskij sbornik naučnych trudov Teoretičeskaja i prikladnaja lingvistika. Aspekty metakommunikativnoj dejatelnosti. Vypusk 3. Voronež, s. 133–141.

[14] VEPREVA, I. T. (2005): Jazykovaja refleksija v postsovetskuju èpochu . Moskva.

[15] VEŽBICKA, A. (1978): Metatekst v tekste . In: Novoje v zarubežnoj lingvistike. Vypusk 8. Lingvistika teksta. Moskva, s. 402−421.

[16] VEŽBICKA, A. (1999): Semantičeskije universalii i opisanije jazykov . Moskva.