[1] Abney, Steven. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
[2] Baker, Mark. 2015. Case: Its Principles and Parameters, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[3] Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2008. Where's Phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In: Harbour, Daniel – Adger, David – Bejar, Susana, eds. Phi Theory: Phi-features across Modules and Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 295–328.
[4] Bonet, Eulàlia – Harbour, Daniel. 2012. Contextual allomorphy. In: Trommer, Jochen, ed. The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 195–235.
[5] Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[6] Citko, Barbara. 2017. Right Node Raising. In: Everaert, Martin – van Riemsdijk, Henk C., eds. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc, pp. 3839–3871.
[7] Comrie, Bernard – Corbett, Greville G., eds. 2002. The Slavonic Languages, London: Routledge.
[8] Embick, David. 2015. The Morpheme: A Theoretical Introduction, Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
[9] Embick, David. 2017. On the targets of phonological realization. In: Gribanova, Vera – Shih, Stephanie S., eds. The Morphosyntax-Phonology Connection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 255–283.
[11] Embick, David – Noyer, Rolf. 2007. Distributed Morphology and the Syntax/Morphology Interface. In: Ramchand, Gillian – Reiss, Charles, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 289–324.
[12] Emonds, Joseph. 1986. Grammatically deviant prestige constructions. In: Brame, Michael – Contreras, Heles – Newmeyer, Fredrick J., eds. A Festschrift for Sol Saporta. Seattle: Noit Amrofer, pp. 93–129.
[13] Halle, Morris – Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: Hale, Ken – Keyser, Samuel Jay, eds. The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111–176.
[15] Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 1998. Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[16] Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 2014. Case in coordinated conjuncts. Nordic Atlas of Language Structures (NALS) Journal 1, pp. 18–27.
[17] Kandybowicz, Jason. 2007. Fusion and PF architecture. In: Scheffler, Tatjana – Tauberer, Joshua – Eilam, Aviad – Mayol, Laia, eds. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(1): Proceedings of the 30th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, pp. 85–98.
[18] Kramer, Ruth. 2015. The Morphosyntax of Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[19] Lasnik, Howard. 2008. On the development of Case theory: Triumphs and challenges. In: Freidin, Robert – Otero, Carlos P. – Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa, eds. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 17–41.
[20] Malchukov, Andrej – Spencer, Andrew, eds. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[21] Marantz, Alec. 2000. Case and licensing. In: Reuland, Eric, ed. Arguments and Case: Explaining Burzio's Generalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 11–30.
[22] Munn, Alan. 1994. Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Coordinate Structures. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland.
[23] O'Conner, Patricia T. 1996. Woe is I: The Grammarphobe's Guide to Better English in Plain English. New York: Berkley Publishing Group.
[24] Parrott, Jeffrey K. 2006. Distributed Morphological mechanisms of pronoun‑case variation. In: Friesner, Michael L. – Ravindranath, Maya, eds. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 12(2): Papers from NWAV 34, pp. 173–187.
[25] Parrott, Jeffrey K. 2007. Distributed Morphological Mechanisms of Labovian Variation in Morphosyntax. Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.
[26] Parrott, Jeffrey K. 2009a. Case variation in coordination: Danish vs. Faroese. Nordlyd 36(2): NORMS Papers on Faroese, pp. 165–185.
[27] Parrott, Jeffrey K. 2009b. Danish vestigial case and the acquisition of Vocabulary in Distributed Morphology. Biolinguistics 3, pp. 270–304.
[28] Parrott, Jeffrey Keith. 2015. Gender Impoverishment in Czech, Slavic, and beyond. In: Ziková, Markéta – Caha, Pavel – Dočekal, Mojmír, eds. Slavic Languages in the Perspective of Formal Grammar: Proceedings of FDSL 10.5, Brno 2014. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 215–232.
[29] Parrott, Jeffrey Keith. To appear. Post-syntactic mechanisms of pronominal case in (North) Germanic. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia.
[30] Pesetsky, David. 2013. Russian Case Morphology and the Syntactic Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[31] Postal, Paul M. 1966. On so-called 'pronouns' in English. In: Dinneen, Francis P., ed. Report of the Seventeenth Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies. Washington: Georgetown University Press, pp. 177–206.
[32] Quinn, Heidi. 2005. The Distribution of Pronoun Case Forms in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[34] Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2006. The Nom/Acc alternation in Germanic. In: Hartmann,
[35] Jutta M. – Molnárfi, László, eds. Comparative Studies in Germanic Syntax. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 13–50.
[36] Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann – van De Weijer, Joost. To appear. Swedish predicative case: default or not? Acta Linguistica Hafniensia.
[37] Sobin, Nicholas. 1997. Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry 28, pp. 318–343.
[39] Starke, Michael. 2009. Nanosyntax: a short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd 36, pp. 1–6.
[40] Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[41] Thráinsson, Höskuldur – Petersen, Hjalmar P. – Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon – Hansen, Zakaris Svabo. 2004. Faroese: An Overview and Reference Grammar. Tórshavn: Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, The Faroese Academy of Sciences.
[42] Ulfsbjorninn, Shanti. 2019. A typology of morphological segment-zero alternations. Course materials for EGG in Wroclaw, Poland.
[43] Weisser, Philipp. 2020.
On the symmetry of case in conjunction. Syntax 23, pp. 42–77. |
DOI 10.1111/synt.12188
[44] Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2012. There is only one way to agree. The Linguistic Review 29, pp. 491–539.