Article
| Title: | The status of sexuality in Neoplatonism |
| Author: | |
| Source document: | Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2020, vol. 25, iss. 2, pp. 163-177 |
| Extent: | 163-177 |
| ISSN: | 1803-7402 (print); 2336-4424 (online) |
| DOI: | 10.5817/GLB2020-2-12 |
| Type: | Article (English) |
| Stable URL: | http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/143322 |
| License: | CC BY-SA 4.0 International |
PDF
Abstract(s):
The stereotype of "Platonic love" that developed during the Renaissance implies a type of relationship, between two people of the opposite gender, which does not involve sexual activity. A new examination of certain relevant texts by Neoplatonists such as Plotinus, Porphyry, Hierocles, Hermias, Proclus and Olympiodorus, written during the period of Late Antiquity, establish that the question of sexuality is present in the very architecture of their systems, thus maintaining a coherent approach over time. "Mixed love", tending towards the sexual union that enables the conception of children, is morally good. Through an exegesis of the Symposium, Phaedrus and First Alcibiades, each of these Neoplatonic philosophers explores sexuality through the prisms of cosmology, ethics and political theory.
Keywords:
sexuality; Neoplatonism; mixed love; Neoplatonic love; Neoplatonic ethic
References:
[1] Adrados, F. R. (Ed.). (1980). Diccionario griego-español (DGE) (Vol. 1). Madrid: CSIC.
[2] Anderson, S., Butterfield, J., & Crozier, J. (Eds.). (2006). Collins English Dictionary (8th ed.). Glasgow: HarperCollins.
[3] Aujoulat, N. (1996). Sur le début du De providentia d'Hiéroclès d'Alexandrie: Photius, Bibliothèque, Codex 251, 460 b, 24-461 a, 22 Byzantinoslavica, 57(2), 217–228.
[4] Armstrong, A. H. (Transl.). (1967). Plotinus, III: Enneads III. 1–9. London – Cambridge, Mass.: Heinemann – Harvard University Press.
[5] Athanassiadi, P. (Ed.). (1999). Damascius: The Philosophical History. Athens: Apamea Cultural Association.
[6] Aubry, G. (2013). (Comment) les Grecs ont-ils pensé la laideur?. In J.-J. Duhot (Ed.), L'archaïque, le réel et la littérature. Quelques chemins en hommage à Gilbert Romeyer Dherbey (pp. 33–46). Lyon: J. André.
[7] Baltzly, D., Finamore, J. F., & Miles, G. (Transl.). (2018). Proclus. Commentary on Plato's Republic (Vol. 1: Essays 1–6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[8] Baltzly, D., & Share, M. (Transl.). (2018). Hermias: On Plato Phaedrus 227A–245E. London: Bloomsbury.
[9] Blanshard, A. J. L. (2010). Sex: Vice and Love from Antiquity to Modernity. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
[10] Bernabé, A. (Ed.). (2004). Poetae epici graeci: testimonia et fragmenta, II: Orphicorum et orphicis similium testimonia et fragmenta (Fasc. 1). München – Leipzig: K. G. Saur.
[11] Bernard, H. (Ed.). (1997). Hermeias von Alexandrien: Kommentar zu Platons Phaidros. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
[12] Bessarion, B. (1503). In calumniatorem Platonis libri quatuor. Venetiis: in aedibus Aldi Romani.
[13] Bouffartigue, J., Patillon, M., & Segonds, A. P. (Eds.). (1977–1995). Porphyre. De l'abstinence (3 vols.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
[14] Brisson, L., & Pradeau, J.-F. (Transl.). (2006). Platon. Les lois. Livres I à VI. Livres VII à XII. (Vol. 2). Paris: Flammarion.
[15] Burnet, J. (Ed.). (1900–1907). Platonis Opera (5 vols.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[16] Couvreur, P. (Ed.). (1901). Hermiae Alexandrini in Platonis Phaedrum scholia. Paris: Bouillon.
[17] Creed, J. L. (Ed.). (1984). Lactantius: De mortibus persecutorum. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[18] Des Places, E. (Ed.). (1971). Oracles chaldaïques: avec un choix de commentaires anciens. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
[19] Des Places, E. (Ed.). (1982). Porphyre. Vie de Pythagore; Lettre à Marcella. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
[20] Diels, H., & Kranz, W. (Eds.). (1951). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker: griechisch und deutsch (DK) (Vol. 1). Berlin: Weidmann.
[21] Dillon, J. (1994). A Platonist Ars Amatoria. Classical Quarterly, 44(2), 387–392. | DOI 10.1017/S0009838800043846
[22] Dover, K. J. (1979). Greek Homosexuality. London: Duckworth.
[23] Duffy, J. M., Sheridan, P. F., Westerink, L. G., & White, J. A. (Eds.). (1969). Porphyry, The Cave of the Nymphs in the Odyssey. Buffalo: Department of Classics, State University of New York at Buffalo.
[24] Fortier, S. (2018). The Nature of the Scholia on Plato's Phaedrus. Phronesis, 63(4), 449–476. | DOI 10.1163/15685284-12341357
[25] Gerson, L. P. (Transl.). (2017). Plotinus: The Enneads. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[26] Giavatto, A. (2019). Notes sur le § 13–19. In T. Dorandi (Ed.), Porphyre. L'Antre des nymphes dans l'Odyssée (pp. 200–210). Paris: Vrin.
[27] Goulet, R. (2004). Hypothèses récentes sur le traité de Porphyre Contre les Chrétiens. In M. Narcy, & E. Rebillard (Eds.), Hellénisme et christianisme (pp. 61–109). Villeneuve d'Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion.
[28] Goulet, R. (2016). Théosébios. In R. Goulet (Ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, VI: De Sabinillus à Tyrsénos (pp. 1128–1129). Paris: CNRS.
[29] Hadot, I. (2015). Athenian and Alexandrian Neoplatonism and the Harmonization of Aristotle and Plato (Transl. M. Chase). Leiden – Boston: Brill.
[30] Hadot, P. (1968). Porphyre et Victorinus (Vol. 1). Paris: Études augustiniennes.
[31] Hadot, P. (Transl.). (1990). Plotin, Traité 50: [Ennéades] III, 5. Paris: Cerf.
[32] Henry, R. (1959–1974) (Ed.). Photius, Bibliothèque (Vols I–VII). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
[33] Henry, P., & Schwyzer, H.-R. (Eds.). (1964–1982). Plotini Opera (3 vols.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[34] Igal, J. (Transl.). (1985). Plotino: Enéadas III–IV. Madrid: Gredos.
[35] Isaac, D. (Ed.). (1982). Proclus: Trois études sur la providence, III: De l'existence du mal. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
[36] Kern, O. (Ed.). (1922). Orphicorum fragmenta. Berlin: Weidmann.
[37] Kremer, K. (1987). Bonum est diffusivum sui. Ein Beitrag zum Verhältnis von Neuplatonismus und Christentum. In W. Haase (Ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (Vol. 36.2; pp. 994–1032). Berlin – New York: De Gruyter.
[38] Kroll, W. (Ed.). (1899–1901). Procli Diadochi in Platonis rem publicam commentarii (2 vols.). Leipzig: Teubner.
[39] Lamberton, R. (Transl.). (1983). Porphyry. On the Cave of the Nymphs. Barrytown, NY: Station Hill Press.
[40] Lamberz, E. (Ed.). (1975). Porphyrii Sententiae ad intelligibilia ducentes. Leipzig: Teubner.
[41] Louis, P. (Ed.). (1964). Aristote. Histoire des animaux, I: Livres I–IV. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
[42] LSJ = Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., & Jones, H. S. (1996). A Greek-English Lexicon (with a revised supplement). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[43] Lucarini, C. M., & Moreschini, C. (Eds.). (2013). Hermias Alexandrinus: In Platonis Phaedrum Scholia. Berlin: De Gruyter.
[44] Marcovich, M. (Ed.). (1967). Heraclitus: Greek Text with a Short Commentary. Mérida: The Los Andes University Press.
[45] Moreschini, C. (2017). Le démon de Socrate et son langage dans la philosophie médioplatonicienne. In L. Soares Santoprete, & P. Hoffmann (Eds.), Langage des dieux, langage des démons, langage des hommes dans l'Antiquité (pp. 121–135). Turnhout: Brepols.
[46] Morvan, T. (2013). Érôs et le lien cosmique: lecture ancienne et nouvelle du Banquet de Platon. Paris: L'Harmattan.
[47] Nauck, A. (Ed.). (1886). Porphyrii philosophi Platonici opuscula selecta. Leipzig: Teubner.
[48] O'Meara, D. J. (1993). Aspects of Political Philosophy in Iamblichus. In H. J. Blumenthal, & E. G. Clark (Eds.), The Divine Iamblichus: Philosopher and Man of Gods (pp. 65–73). London: Bristol Classical Press.
[49] O'Meara, D. J. (2003). Sur les traces de l'absolu: études de philosophie antique. Fribourg – Paris: Academic Press Fribourg – Cerf.
[50] O'Neill, W. (Transl.). (1971). Proclus: Alcibiades I. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
[51] Roskam, G. (2014). Socratic Love in Neoplatonism. In D. A. Layne, & H. Tarrant (Eds.), The Neoplatonic Socrates (pp. 21–35). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
[52] Saffrey, H. D., & Westerink, L. G. (Eds.). (1968–1997). Proclus: Théologie platonicienne (6 vols.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
[53] Segonds, A. P. (Ed.). (1985–1986). Proclus: Sur le premier Alcibiade de Platon (2 vols.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
[54] Simonini, L. (Transl.). (1986). Porfirio, L'antro delle Ninfe. Milano: Adelphi.
[55] Van der Meeren, S. (2017). L' 'entretien' philosophique d'après le commentaire de Proclus au Premier Alcibiade de Platon. In L. G. Soares Santoprete, & P. Hoffmann (Eds.), Langage des dieux, langage des démons, langage des hommes dans l'Antiquité (pp. 231–262). Turnhout: Brepols.
[56] Van Riel, G., Macé, C., & Follon, J. (Eds.). (2008). Damascius. Commentaire sur le Philèbe de Platon. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
[57] Westerink, L. G. (Ed.). (1954). Proclus Diadochus. Commentary on the first Alcibiades of Plato. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
[58] Westerink, L. G. (Ed.). (1956). Olympiodorus. Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
[59] Westerink, L. G. (Ed.). (1970). Olympiodorus. In Platonis Gorgiam Commentaria. Leipzig: Teubner.
[60] Westerink, L. G., Trouillard, J., & Segonds, A. P. (Eds.). (1990). Prolégomènes à la philosophie de Platon. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
[61] Wolters, A. M. (1972). Plotinus on Eros: a Detailed Exegetical Study of Enneads III, 5. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam.
[62] Zamora Calvo, J. M. (2016). E l primer principio, 'potencia de todas las cosas', en Plotino. Endoxa, 38, 131–144 [online available at https://doi-org.ezproxy.muni.cz/10.5944/endoxa.38.2016.16596]. | DOI 10.5944/endoxa.38.2016.16596
[63] Zintzen, C. (Ed.). (1967). Damascii Vitae Isidori reliquiae edidit annotationibusque instruxit. Hildesheim: Olms.
