Similarity-attraction theory and feedback-seeking behavior at work : how do they impact employability?

Title: Similarity-attraction theory and feedback-seeking behavior at work : how do they impact employability?
Source document: Studia paedagogica. 2021, vol. 26, iss. 2, pp. [77]-96
Extent
[77]-96
  • ISSN
    1803-7437 (print)
    2336-4521 (online)
Type: Article
Language
License: Not specified license
 

Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.

Abstract(s)
Employees' feedback-seeking networks at work are important for employees' learning and employability. Earlier studies often neglected the specific characteristics of the different relationships an individual employee has at work. We conduct social network analyses in seven samples to study inter-individual differences in feedback-seeking relationships in detail. We investigate 2,058 feedback-seeking relationships of 118 employees to study how similarity-attraction affects the composition of feedback-seeking networks at work and how the composition of these feedback-seeking networks influences employees' employability. This research study aims to contribute by taking into account both the mechanisms that shape feedback-seeking networks and the effects of this on employability. The results show that similarity-attraction affects feedback-seeking in the workplace and that having a largely homogeneous feedback-seeking network has detrimental effects on employability.
References
[1] Alexiev, A. S., Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2010). Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1343–1364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00919.x | DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00919.x

[2] Ammons, R. B. (1956). Effects of knowledge of performance: A survey and tentative theoretical formulation. Journal of General Psychology, 54(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1956.9920284 | DOI 10.1080/00221309.1956.9920284

[3] Anseel, F., Beatty, A. S., Shen, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2013). How are we doing after 30 years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior. Journal of Management, 41(1), 318–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313484521 | DOI 10.1177/0149206313484521

[4] Anseel, F., Lievens, F., & Levy, P. E. (2007). A self-motives perspective on feedback-seeking behavior: Linking organizational behavior and social psychology research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(3), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00210.x | DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00210.x

[5] Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., & VandeWalle, D. (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 29(6), 773–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00079-5 | DOI 10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00079-5

[6] Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1985). Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 67–79. | DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1985.tb00181.x

[7] Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991). Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 251–280.

[8] Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 | DOI 10.1177/014920639101700108

[9] Batistic, S., & Tymon, A. (2017). Networking behaviour, graduate employability: A social capital perspective. Education + Training, 59(4), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2016-0100 | DOI 10.1108/ET-06-2016-0100

[10] Becker, G. S. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 385–409. https://doi.org/10.1086/261880 | DOI 10.1086/261880

[11] Berntson, E., Sverke, M., & Marklund, S. (2006). Predicting perceived employability: Human capital or labour market opportunities? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 27(2), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X06063098 | DOI 10.1177/0143831X06063098

[12] Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428 | DOI 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428

[13] Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press.

[14] Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. Academic Press.

[15] Carpenter, M. A., Li, M., & Jiang, H. (2012). Social network research in organizational contexts: A Systematic review of methodological issues and choices. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1328–1361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312440119 | DOI 10.1177/0149206312440119

[16] Chen, Y. (2017). Graduate employability: The perspective of social network learning. EUR ASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01241a | DOI 10.12973/eurasia.2017.01241a

[17] Cheramie, R. (2013). An examination of feedback-seeking behaviors, the feedback source and career success. Career Development International, 18(7), 712–731. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-05-2013-0070 | DOI 10.1108/CDI-05-2013-0070

[18] Chrobot-Mason, D., & Aramovich, N. P. (2013). The psychological benefits of creating an affirming climate for workplace diversity. Group & Organization Management, 38(6), 659–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601113509835 | DOI 10.1177/1059601113509835

[19] Chua, R. Y. J. (2018). Innovating at cultural crossroads: How multicultural social networks promote idea flow and creativity. Journal of Management, 44(3), 1119–1146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315601183 | DOI 10.1177/0149206315601183

[20] Cummings, J. N., & Cross, R. (2003). Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks, 25(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00049-7 | DOI 10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00049-7

[21] De Vos, A., De Hauw, S., & Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2011). Competency development and career success: The mediating role of employability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.010 | DOI 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.010

[22] Dekker, D., Krackhardt, D., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2003, March 30). Multicollinearity robust QAP for multipe-regression. North American Association for Computational Social and Organizational Science Conference. http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/publications/papers/dekker_2003_multicollinearity.pdf

[23] Dries, N., Forrier, A., De Vos, A., & Pepermans, R. (2014). Self-perceived employability, organization-rated potential, and the psychological contract. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(5), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-04-2013-0109 | DOI 10.1108/JMP-04-2013-0109

[24] Feld, S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1015–1035. https://doi.org/10.1086/227352 | DOI 10.1086/227352

[25] Ferris, G. R., Judge, T. A., Chachere, J. G., & Liden, R. C. (1991). The age context of performance-evaluation decisions. Psychology and Aging, 6(4), 616–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.6.4.616 | DOI 10.1037/0882-7974.6.4.616

[26] Frieling, M., & Froehlich, D. E. (2017). Homophilie, diversity und feedback: Eine soziale Netzwerkanalyse [Homophily, diversity, and feedback: A social network analysis]. In B., Covarrubias Venegas, K., Thill, & J. Domnanovich (Eds.), Personalmanagement. Forschung und Praxis an der FHWien der WKW (pp.179–192). Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15170-6_10 | DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-15170-6_10

[27] Froehlich, D. E. (2017). Older managers' informal learning in knowledge-intensive organizations: Investigating the role of learning approaches among Austrian bank managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(2), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244897 | DOI 10.1080/09585192.2016.1244897

[28] Froehlich, D. E., Beausaert, S. A. J., & Segers, M. S. R. (2015). Great expectations: The relationship between future time perspective, learning from others, and employability. Vocations and Learning, 8(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-015-9131-6 | DOI 10.1007/s12186-015-9131-6

[29] Froehlich, D. E., Beausaert, S. A. J., & Segers, M. S. R. (2017). Development and validation of a scale measuring approaches to work-related informal learning. International Journal of Training and Development, 21(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12099 | DOI 10.1111/ijtd.12099

[30] Froehlich, D. E., Beausaert, S. A. J., Segers, M. S. R., & Gerken, M. (2014). Learning to stay employable. Career Development International, 19(5), 508–525. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2013-0139 | DOI 10.1108/CDI-11-2013-0139

[31] Froehlich, D. E., & Brouwer, J. (2021). Social network analysis as mixed analysis. In A. J. Onwuegbuzie & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), Routledge reviewer's guide for mixed methods analysis. Routledge.

[32] Froehlich, D. E., Liu, M., & Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2018). Work in progress: The progression of competence-based employability. Career Development International, 23(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-06-2017-0098 | DOI 10.1108/CDI-06-2017-0098

[33] Froehlich, D. E., & Messmann, G. (2017). The social side of innovative work behavior: determinants of social interaction during organizational innovation processes. Business Creativity and the Creative Economy, 3(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.18536/bcce.2017.10.3.1.03 | DOI 10.18536/bcce.2017.10.3.1.03

[34] Froehlich, D. E., Rehm, M., & Rienties, B. C. (Eds.). (2020). Mixed methods social network analysis: Theories and methodologies in learning and education. Routledge.

[35] Froehlich, D. E., Segers, M., Beausaert, S., & Kremer, M. (2019). On the relation between task-variety, social informal learning, and employability. Vocations and Learning, 12(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-018-9212-4 | DOI 10.1007/s12186-018-9212-4

[36] Froehlich, D. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Van den Bossche, P. (2014). Informal workplace learning in Austrian banks: The influence of learning approach, leadership style, and organizational learning culture on managers' learning outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21173 | DOI 10.1002/hrdq.21173

[37] Froehlich, D. E., Van Waes, S., & Schäfer, H. (2020). Linking quantitative and qualitative network approaches: A review of mixed methods social network analysis in education research. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 244–268. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903311 | DOI 10.3102/0091732X20903311

[38] Gerken, M., Beausaert, S., & Segers, M. (2016). Working on professional development of faculty staff in higher education: Investigating the relationship between social informal learning activities and employability. Human Resource Development International, 19(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2015.1116241 | DOI 10.1080/13678868.2015.1116241

[39] Goldberg, C. B., Riordan, C., & Schaffer, B. S. (2010). Does social identity theory underlie relational demography? A test of the moderating effects of uncertainty reduction and status enhancement on similarity effects. Human Relations, 63(7), 903–926. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709347158 | DOI 10.1177/0018726709347158

[40] Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469 | DOI 10.1086/225469

[41] Harwood, J., & Froehlich, D. E. (2017). Proactive feedback-seeking, teaching performance, and flourishing amongst teachers in an international primary school. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 425–444). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_21 | DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_21

[42] Higgins, M. C., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Constellations and careers: Toward understanding the effects of multiple developmental relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(3), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.66 | DOI 10.1002/job.66

[43] Hollstein, B., & Straus, F. (2006). Qualitative Netzwerkanalyse (F. Straus, Ed.; 1st Ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

[44] Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422–447. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393451 | DOI 10.2307/2393451

[45] Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(2), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393414 | DOI 10.2307/2393414

[46] Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349 | DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349

[47] Kleinbaum, A. M., Stuart, T. E., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organization Science, 24(5), 1316–1336. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0804 | DOI 10.1287/orsc.1120.0804

[48] Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 | DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254

[49] Krackhardt, D., & Kilduff, M. (1999). Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 770–782. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.770 | DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.770

[50] Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society, 18(1), 18–66.

[51] Lecat, A., Beausaert, S., & Raemdonck, I. (2018). On the relation between teachers' (in)formal learning and innovative working behavior: The mediating role of employability. Vocations and Learning, 11(3), 529–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-018-9199-x | DOI 10.1007/s12186-018-9199-x

[52] London, M. (1995). Giving feedback: Source-centered antecedents and consequences of constructive and destructive feedback. Human Resource Management Review, 5(3), 159–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(95)90001-2 | DOI 10.1016/1053-4822(95)90001-2

[53] Louch, H. (2000). Personal network integration: Transitivity an homophily in strong-tie relations. Social Networks, 22(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(00)00015-0 | DOI 10.1016/S0378-8733(00)00015-0

[54] Lu, C., Sun, J., & Du, D. (2015). The relationships between employability, emotional exhaustion, and turnover intention: The moderation of perceived career opportunity. Journal of Career Development, 43(52), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845315576372 | DOI 10.1177/0894845315576372

[55] Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference?: The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x | DOI 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x

[56] McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 | DOI 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415

[57] Mello, A. L., & Delise, L. A. (2015). Cognitive diversity to team outcomes: The roles of cohesion and conflict management. Small Group Research, 46(2), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496415570916 | DOI 10.1177/1046496415570916

[58] Miura, A. (2004). Synergy between diversity and similarity in group-idea generation. Small Group Research, 35(5), 540–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496404264942 | DOI 10.1177/1046496404264942

[59] Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford University Press.

[60] Mulder, R. H., & Ellinger, A. D. (2013). Perceptions of quality of feedback in organizations: Characteristics, determinants, outcomes of feedback, and possibilities for improvement: Introduction to a special issue. European Journal of Training and Development, 37(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591311293266 | DOI 10.1108/03090591311293266

[61] Palonen, T., & Froehlich, D. E. (2020). Mixed methods social network analysis to drive organizational development. In D. E. Froehlich, M. Rehm, & B. C. Rienties (Eds.), Mixed methods social network analysis: Theories and methodologies in learning and education (pp. 87–100). Routledge.

[62] Patrickson, M., & Ranzijn, R. (2003). Employability of older workers. Equal Opportunities International, 22(5), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150310787496 | DOI 10.1108/02610150310787496

[63] Peccei, R., & Lee, H. J. (2005). The impact of gender similarity on employee satisfaction at work: A review and re-evaluation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(8), 1571–1592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00557.x | DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00557.x

[64] Peeters, E., Nelissen, J., Cuyper, N. D., Forrier, A., Verbruggen, M., & Witte, H. D. (2017). Employability capital: A conceptual framework tested through expert analysis. Journal of Career Development, 46(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845317731865 | DOI 10.1177/0894845317731865

[65] Phillips, K. W., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (2006). Surface-level diversity and decision-making in groups: When does deep-level similarity help? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(4), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206067557 | DOI 10.1177/1368430206067557

[66] Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408 | DOI 10.1177/014920638601200408

[67] Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., & McEvily, B. (2004). How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(1), 101–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/4131457 | DOI 10.2307/4131457

[68] Rice, R. E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393354 | DOI 10.2307/2393354

[69] Skerlavaj, M., Dimovski, V., & Desouza, K. C. (2010). Patterns and structures of intra-organizational learning networks within a knowledge-intensive organization. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2010.3 | DOI 10.1057/jit.2010.3

[70] Standifer, R. L., Lester, S. W., Schultz, N. J., & Windsor, J. M. (2013). How age similarity preference, uncertainty, and workplace challenges affect conflict. Human Relations, 66(12), 1597–1618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713482012 | DOI 10.1177/0018726713482012

[71] Tsui, A. S., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 402–423. https://doi.org/10.5465/256368 | DOI 10.5465/256368

[72] Van der Heijde, C. M., & Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2006). A competence-based and multidimensional operationalization and measurement of employability. Human Resource Management, 45(3), 449–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20119 | DOI 10.1002/hrm.20119

[73] Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2011). Toward a mediation model of employability enhancement: A study of employee-supervisor pairs in the building sector. Career Development Quarterly, 59(3), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2011.tb00066.x | DOI 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2011.tb00066.x

[74] Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., Boon, J., Van der Klink, M. R., & Meijs, E. (2009). Employability enhancement through formal and informal learning: An empirical study among Dutch non-academic university staff members. International Journal of Training and Development, 13(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2008.00313.x | DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2419.2008.00313.x

[75] Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., Gorgievski, M. J., & De Lange, A. H. (2016). Learning at the workplace and sustainable employability: A multi-source model moderated by age. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1007130 | DOI 10.1080/1359432X.2015.1007130

[76] Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., Notelaers, G., Peters, P., Stoffers, J. M. M., De Lange, A. H., Froehlich, D. E., & Van der Heijde, C. M. (2018). Development and validation of the short-form employability five-factor instrument. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.02.003 | DOI 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.02.003

[77] Van der Rijt, J., Van den Bossche, P., Van de Wiel, M. W. J., Segers, M. S. R., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2012a). The role of individual and organizational characteristics in feedback-seeking behaviour in the initial career stage. Human Resource Development International, 15(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2012.689216 | DOI 10.1080/13678868.2012.689216

[78] Van Hootegem, A., & De Witte, H. (2019). Qualitative job insecurity and informal learning: A longitudinal test of occupational self-efficacy and psychological contract breach as mediators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101847 | DOI 10.3390/ijerph16101847

[79] Vancouver, J. B., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Feedback inquiry: The effect of source attributes and individual differences. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 62(3), 276–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1050 | DOI 10.1006/obhd.1995.1050

[80] Wang, M., Burlacu, G., Truxillo, D., James, K., & Yao, X. (2015). Age differences in feedback reactions: The roles of employee feedback orientation on social awareness and utility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1296–1308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038334 | DOI 10.1037/a0038334

[81] Wexley, K. N., Alexander, R. A., Greenawalt, J. P., & Couch, M. A. (1980). Attitudinal congruence and similarity as related to interpersonal evaluations in manager-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 23(2), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.5465/255434 | DOI 10.5465/255434

[82] Winter, F., & Mitesh, K. (2013). You are who your friends are: An experiment on trust and homophily in friendship networks. Jena Economic Research Papers, 44, 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2347536 | DOI 10.2139/ssrn.2347536

[83] Wright, K. (2000). Perceptions of on-line support providers: An examination of perceived homophily, source credibility, communication and social support within on-line support groups. Communication Quarterly, 48(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370009385579 | DOI 10.1080/01463370009385579

[84] Wu, C.-H., Parker, S. K., & de Jong, J. (2013). Feedback seeking from peers: A positive strategy for insecurely attached team-workers. Human Relations, 67(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713496124 | DOI 10.1177/0018726713496124

[85] Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/256366 | DOI 10.2307/256366