Název: Zpráva z 14th ISORECEA Online Conference
Zdrojový dokument: Sacra. 2021, roč. 19, č. 1, s. 85-90
Rozsah
85-90
-
ISSN1214-5351 (print)2336-4483 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/144362
Type: Zpráva
Jazyk
Licence: Neurčená licence
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Reference
[1] Boyer, P. (2001). Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
[2] Bubík, T., Remmel, A., & Václavík, D. (Eds.) (2020). Freethought and Atheism in Central and Eastern Europe: The Development of Secularity and Non-Religion. London – New York: Routledge – Taylor & Francis Group.
[3] Laidlaw, J. (2007). A Well-Disposed Social Anthropologist's Problems with the 'Cognitive Science of Religion'. In H. Whitehouse & J. Laidlaw (Eds.), Religion, Anthropology, and Cognitive Science (pp. 211–246). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
[4] Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big Gods: How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[5] Shore, B. (2012). Unconsilience: Rethinking the Two-cultures Conundrum in Anthropology. In E. Slingerland & M. Collard (Eds.), Creating Consilience: Integrating the Sciences and the Humanities (New Directions in Cognitive Science) (pp. 140–158). New York: Oxford University Press.
[6] Whitehouse, H. (2004). Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
[2] Bubík, T., Remmel, A., & Václavík, D. (Eds.) (2020). Freethought and Atheism in Central and Eastern Europe: The Development of Secularity and Non-Religion. London – New York: Routledge – Taylor & Francis Group.
[3] Laidlaw, J. (2007). A Well-Disposed Social Anthropologist's Problems with the 'Cognitive Science of Religion'. In H. Whitehouse & J. Laidlaw (Eds.), Religion, Anthropology, and Cognitive Science (pp. 211–246). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
[4] Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big Gods: How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[5] Shore, B. (2012). Unconsilience: Rethinking the Two-cultures Conundrum in Anthropology. In E. Slingerland & M. Collard (Eds.), Creating Consilience: Integrating the Sciences and the Humanities (New Directions in Cognitive Science) (pp. 140–158). New York: Oxford University Press.
[6] Whitehouse, H. (2004). Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.