Fluctus curarum : Catullan and Lucretian intertexts in the Dido-episode of the Aeneid

Název: Fluctus curarum : Catullan and Lucretian intertexts in the Dido-episode of the Aeneid
Zdrojový dokument: Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2019, roč. 24, č. 2, s. 225-234
  • ISSN
    1803-7402 (print)
    2336-4424 (online)
Type: Článek

Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.

This paper examines the way the depiction of Medea in Ennius' Medea exul and that of Ariadne in Catullus 64 constitute the background for the Dido-episode of Vergil's Aeneid. Regarding the intertextual relations of the Vergilian and the Catullan texts, I focus on the motif of fluctus curarum, the 'flow of concerns' affecting the above mentioned heroines. These Catullo-Vergilian intertextual connections are tinged by the circumstance that the phrase is also employed by Lucretius in his De rerum natura. It will be of key importance to observe the way the Aeneid's combined reminiscences to the Lucretian mankind as a victim of illusions and to the Catullan Ariadne as not only a victim but also a product of them lay the foundation of Dido's falling prey to unrealities.
[1] Dyson, J. T. (1996). Dido the Epicurean. Classical Antiquity, 15(2), 203–221. | DOI 10.2307/25011040

[2] Dyson, J. T. (1997). Fluctus irarum, fluctus curarum: Lucretian Religio in the Aeneid. American Journal of Philology, 118, 449–457. | DOI 10.1353/ajp.1997.0039

[3] Gildenhard, I. (2012). Virgil, Aeneid, 4.1–299. Latin text, study questions, commentary and interpretive essays. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.

[4] Hardie, P. (2002). Ovid's Poetics of Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[5] Moskalew, W. (1982). Formular Language and Poetic Design in the Aeneid. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

[6] Nappa, C. (2007). Catullus and Vergil. In M. Skinner (Ed.), A Companion to Catullus (pp. 377–398). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

[7] Putnam, M. C. J. (2016). Virgil and the Achilles of Catullus. In Ph. Mitsis, & I. Zigoas (Eds.), Wordplay and Powerplay in Latin Poetry (pp. 151–168). Berlin: De Gruyter.

[8] Sedley, D. (2003). The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[9] Tamás, Á. (2016). Erroneous gazes: Lucretian poetics in Catullus 64. Journal of Roman Studies, 106, 1–20. | DOI 10.1017/S0075435816000320

[10] Thomas, R. F. (1982). Catullus and the Polemics of Poetic Reference: Poem 64.1–18. American Journal of Philology, 103(2), 144–164. | DOI 10.2307/294245

[11] Zetzel, J. E. G. (1983). Catullus, Ennius and the Poetics of Allusion. Illinois Classical Studies, 8, 251–266.

[12] Kline, A. S. (Transl.). (2014). Virgil: The Aeneid. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

[13] Leonard, W. E. (1921). Lucretius: On the Nature of Things. New York: Dutton.

[14] Smithers, L. C. (1894). The Carmina of Caius Valerius Catullus. London.