A re-examination of wieder: remarks on an overlooked prefix

Název: A re-examination of wieder: remarks on an overlooked prefix
Zdrojový dokument: Linguistica Brunensia. 2017, roč. 65, č. 1, s. 37-50
Rozsah
37-50
  • ISSN
    1803-7410 (print)
    2336-4440 (online)
Type: Článek
Licence: Neurčená licence
 

Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.

Abstrakt(y)
Departing from the repetitive-restitutive ambiguity of the German adverb wieder ('again'), we investigate its homophonous counterpart, the verbal prefix wieder (VPW). It occurs in verbs like wiederauferstehen ('to resurrect') and corresponding deverbal nouns (Wiederauferstehung 'resurrection'). We offer an initial structural and semantic description of these forms and elaborate on the specific requirements that VPW seems to impose on the base it attaches to. We observe that formations with VPW show a strong preference for restitutive interpretations and that VPW, in contrast to the adverb, seems to require completeness of the end state, which can be attained by a specific morphological makeup of the base. This suggests that VPW constructions might also be analyzable in a scalar fashion, calling into question the decompositional approach proposed for the adverb. Our findings are also briefly put into cross-linguistic perspective by looking at re-, the English counterpart of VPW, and some data from Dutch.
Reference
[1] Beck, Sigrid – Gergel, Remus. 2015. The Diachronic Semantics of English Again. Natural Language Semantics 23(3), pp. 157–203. | DOI 10.1007/s11050-015-9111-2

[2] Beck, Sigrid – Johnson, Kyle. 2004. Double Objects Again. Linguistic Inquiry 35, pp. 97–124. | DOI 10.1162/002438904322793356

[3] Beck, Sigrid. 2005. There and Back Again: A Semantic Analysis. Journal of Semantics 22, pp. 3–51. | DOI 10.1093/jos/ffh016

[4] Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Focus on Again. Linguistics and Philosophy 29, pp. 277–314.

[5] Blümel, Andreas – Particke, Hans-Joachim. in prep. Revisiting Wieder. Ms., University of Göttingen.

[6] Blutner, Reinhard – Jäger, Gerhard. 2003. Competition and Interpretation: The German Adverb Wieder ('Again'). In: Lang, Ewald et al., eds., Modifying Adjuncts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 393–416.

[7] Cardinaletti, Anna. 2003. On the Italian Repetitive Prefix ri-: Incorporation vs. Cliticization. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 13, pp. 7–29.

[8] Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.

[9] Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine. 2001. "Wi(e)der" and "Again(st)". In: Féry, Caroline – Sternefeld, Wolfgang, eds., Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 101–130.

[10] Fleischer, Wolfgang – Barz, Irmhild. 2012. Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.

[11] Gergel, Remus – Blümel, Andreas – Kopf, Martin. 2016. Another Heavy Road of Decompositionality: Notes from a Dying Adverb. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium (PLC). 22(1). Pennsylvania: PWPL, pp. 109–118.

[12] Grewendorf, Günther. 1989. Ergativity in German. Dordrecht: Foris.

[13] Holsinger, Edward. 2008. Re-, Again. A Semantic Investigation of Restitutive re- and Again in English. LSA Summer Meeting (handout), Ohio State University.

[14] Horn, Laurence R. 1980. Affixation and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 16, pp. 134–146.

[15] Keyser, Samuel Jay – Roeper, Thomas. 1992. Re: The Abstract Clitic Hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry 23(1), pp. 89–125.

[16] Lüdeling, Anke. 2001. On Particle Verbs and Similar Constructions in German. Stanford: CSLI.

[17] Marantz, Alec. 2007. Restitutive Re- and the First Phase of Syntax/Semantics of the VP. Ms., New York University.

[18] McIntyre, Andrew. 2007. Particle Verbs and Argument Structure. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(4), pp. 350–367. | DOI 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00013.x

[19] Patel-Grosz, Pritty – Beck, Sigrid. 2014. Revisiting again: The View from Kutchi Gujarati. In: Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 18. University of the Basque Country, pp. 303–321.

[20] Pedersen, Walter A. 2014. A Scalar Analysis of Again-Ambiguities. Journal of Semantics, pp. 1–52.

[21] Pittner, Karin. 2009. Wieder als Modalpartikel. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 37(2), pp. 296–314.

[22] Sparthas, Giorgos et al. 2015. On Deriving the Typology of Repetition and Restitution. GLOW (handout), Paris.

[23] Sportiche, Dominique. 2012. Re re Again. In: Brugé, Laura et al., eds., Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 253–262.

[24] Von Stechow, Arnim. 1996. The Different Readings of Wieder 'Again': A Structural Account. Journal of Semantics 13, pp. 87–138. | DOI 10.1093/jos/13.2.87