Nevyhnutnosť kognitívneho prístupu (nielen) pri štúdiu náboženskej konverzie

Název: Nevyhnutnosť kognitívneho prístupu (nielen) pri štúdiu náboženskej konverzie
Autor: Cigán, Jakub
Zdrojový dokument: Sacra. 2008, roč. 6, č. 2, s. 51-70
  • ISSN
    1214-5351 (print)
    2336-4483 (online)
Type: Článek
Licence: Neurčená licence
Jazyk shrnutí
[1] Barret, L. – Dunbar, R. – Lyccett, J. 2007. Evoluční psychologie člověka. Praha: Portál.

[2] Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained. The Human Instincts That Fashion Gods, Spirits and Ancestors. London: William Heinemann.

[3] Damasio, A. 2000 (1995). Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Quill.

[4] Damasio, A. 2004 (2003). Hledání Spinozy: radost, strast a citový mozek. Praha: Dybbuk.

[5] Fodor, J. 1983. Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

[6] Guthrie, S. 1993. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[7] Hirschfeld, L. – Gelman S. (eds.) 1994. Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[8] Heckathorn, D. 2005. "Rational Choice" In: Ritzer, G. (ed target=_blank> 5. 4. 2005).

[9] Lakoff, G. 2006 (1987). Ženy, oheň a nebezpečné věci: Co kategorie vypovídají o naší mysli. Praha: Triáda.

[10] Lakoff, G. – Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

[11] Lakoff, G. – Ńunéz, R. 1997. "The Metaphorical Structure of Mathematics. Sketching Out Cognitive Foundations for Mind-Based Mathematics." In: English, L. (ed.), Mathematical Reasoning. Analogies, Metaphors, and Images. Hillsdale/N.J.: Erlbaum.

[12] Lofland,J. – Stark, R. 1965. "Becoming a World-Saver: A Theory of Conversion to a Deviant Perspective." American Sociological Review 30, 862–875. | DOI 10.2307/2090965

[13] McCutcheon, R. T. 1997. Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[14] Pinker, S. 2002. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking.

[15] Pyysiäinen, I. 2001. How Religion Works: Towards a New Cognitive Science of Religion. Leiden – Boston – Köln: Brill.

[16] Pyysiäinen, I. 2004. Magic, Miracles, and Religion: A Scientist's Perspective. Oxford: Altamira Press.

[17] Rips, J. 1975. "Inductive Judgments about Natural Categories" Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14, 665–681. | DOI 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80055-7

[18] Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York – London: Penguin Books.

[19] Snow, D. – Machalek, R. 1983. "The Convert as Social Type" In: Collins, R. (ed.), Sociological Theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 259–289. | DOI 10.2307/202053

[20] Sperber, D.(ed.) 2000. Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

[21] Staples, C. – Mauss, A. 1987. "Conversion or Commitment? A Reassessment of the Snow and Machalek Approach to the Study of Conversion." Journal for the scientific Study of Religion 26, 133–147. | DOI 10.2307/1385790

[22] Smith, J. Z. 1982. Imagining religion. London – Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

[23] Varela, F. J. – Thomson,E. – Rosch, E. 1993. The Embodied Mind, Cognitive Science and Human Experience. London: MIT Press.