Název: Perspektívy rozvoja informačnej etiky v informačnej vede
Variantní název:
- Prospective trends in development of information ethics in information science
Zdrojový dokument: ProInflow. 2023, roč. 15, č. 2, s. [35]-67
Rozsah
[35]-67
-
ISSN1804-2406 (online)
Trvalý odkaz (DOI): https://doi.org/10.5817/ProIn2023-33837
Trvalý odkaz (handle): https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/digilib.79616
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: CC BY 4.0 International
Přístupová práva
otevřený přístup
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.
Abstrakt(y)
Účel – Sumarizujú sa trendy rozvoja informačnej etiky z pohľadu trendov výskumov informačnej vedy. Cieľom výskumnej štúdie je prezentovať výskum názorov expertov súvisiaci s budúcnosťou informačnej etiky.
Metodológia / dizajn – Využívame inovatívnu metodológiu kombinujúcu bibliometrické analýzy, kvalitatívne analýzy dát diskusie expertov a konceptuálne modelovanie. Dizajn štúdie vychádza z Delfskej štúdie zameranej na informačnú etiku. Východiskom sú obsahové analýzy vybraných publikovaných prác so zameraním na informačnú etiku, kvalitatívne analýzy dát v rámci Delfskej štúdie, metaanalýzy výsledkov prvých kôl štúdie a konceptuálne modelovanie.
Výsledky – Predstavuje sa pojmový model štruktúry tém informačnej etiky a pojmová reprezentácia etiky digitálnych informácií. Identifikuje sa tematická diverzita a viacrozmernosť informačnej etiky. Aktuálne témy informačnej etiky sú etika aplikácií umelej inteligencie, dátová etika, etika informačnej gramotnosti, informačná bezpečnosť, ochrana súkromia. Predstavujú sa výsledky analýz diskurzu 6 expertov z diskusie so zameraním na budúcnosť informačnej etiky (etická kríza, riziká umelej inteligencie, možné nástroje riešenia problémov). Komparáciou tém sa vyvodzuje multidimenzionální model etických výziev digitálnych informácií a model etických faktorov informačných interakcií človeka.
Originalita / hodnota – Navrhnuté modely možno využiť pri projektovaní etických funkcií systémov a služieb a v ďalšom výskume. Odporúča sa hodnotovo senzitívny dizajn s aplikáciou morálnej imaginácie a morálnej gramotnosti. V perspektívach informačnej etiky dominuje formovanie etického povedomia a citlivosti komunít a spolupráca rôznych aktérov (výskum, online platformy ai.). V záveroch sa navrhuje spolupráca rôznych odborov pri transdisciplinárnych problémoch informačnej etiky (informačná veda, informatika, humanitné, sociálne a psychologické vedy). Zdôrazňuje sa význam inovatívnych zmiešaných metodologických prístupov k výskumu informačnej etiky, výskum kontextu a hodnôt informácií, digitálneho života človeka a etiky umelej inteligencie.
Metodológia / dizajn – Využívame inovatívnu metodológiu kombinujúcu bibliometrické analýzy, kvalitatívne analýzy dát diskusie expertov a konceptuálne modelovanie. Dizajn štúdie vychádza z Delfskej štúdie zameranej na informačnú etiku. Východiskom sú obsahové analýzy vybraných publikovaných prác so zameraním na informačnú etiku, kvalitatívne analýzy dát v rámci Delfskej štúdie, metaanalýzy výsledkov prvých kôl štúdie a konceptuálne modelovanie.
Výsledky – Predstavuje sa pojmový model štruktúry tém informačnej etiky a pojmová reprezentácia etiky digitálnych informácií. Identifikuje sa tematická diverzita a viacrozmernosť informačnej etiky. Aktuálne témy informačnej etiky sú etika aplikácií umelej inteligencie, dátová etika, etika informačnej gramotnosti, informačná bezpečnosť, ochrana súkromia. Predstavujú sa výsledky analýz diskurzu 6 expertov z diskusie so zameraním na budúcnosť informačnej etiky (etická kríza, riziká umelej inteligencie, možné nástroje riešenia problémov). Komparáciou tém sa vyvodzuje multidimenzionální model etických výziev digitálnych informácií a model etických faktorov informačných interakcií človeka.
Originalita / hodnota – Navrhnuté modely možno využiť pri projektovaní etických funkcií systémov a služieb a v ďalšom výskume. Odporúča sa hodnotovo senzitívny dizajn s aplikáciou morálnej imaginácie a morálnej gramotnosti. V perspektívach informačnej etiky dominuje formovanie etického povedomia a citlivosti komunít a spolupráca rôznych aktérov (výskum, online platformy ai.). V záveroch sa navrhuje spolupráca rôznych odborov pri transdisciplinárnych problémoch informačnej etiky (informačná veda, informatika, humanitné, sociálne a psychologické vedy). Zdôrazňuje sa význam inovatívnych zmiešaných metodologických prístupov k výskumu informačnej etiky, výskum kontextu a hodnôt informácií, digitálneho života človeka a etiky umelej inteligencie.
Purpose – We summarize trends in development of information ethics from the viewpoint of trends of research in information science. The aim of the study is to present the experts´ consensus with regard to future of information ethics.
Methodology / design – We apply mixed innovative methodology which integrates bibliometric analyses, qualitative analysis of data from the experts' discussion and conceptual modelling. The design of the study is related to the structure of a Delphi study. The starting point is based on content analyses of selected published works on information ethics, meta-analyses and conceptual modelling.
Results – We present a conceptual model of the structured topics of information ethics and a model of conceptual representations of ethics of digital information We have identified topical diversity and multidimensionality of information ethics. The perspective topics of information ethics include ethics of artificial intelligence, data ethics, ethics of information literacy, protection of privacy and information security. Results of the discourse analysis of online discussion of 6 experts focused on future of information ethics. Experts identified ethical crisis, risks of artificial intelligence and possible means for solution of ethical issues. Comparison of resulting topics lead to the design of a multidimensional model of ethical challenges of digital information and a model of ethical factors of human information interactions.
Value / originality – The proposed models can be used for design of ethical features of systems and services and for future research. We recommend value sensitive design focused on moral imagination and moral literacy. For prospective research of information ethics, the focus is formed by ethical sensitivity and ethical awareness of communities and collaboration of different actors (research, online platforms, etc.). In conclusions we propose closer collaboration of disciplines in solving transdisciplinary issues of information ethics (information science, computer science, cognitive sciences, psychology, humanities and social sciences). We emphasize the significance of innovative methodological approaches to studies of information ethics focused mainly on studies of context and values of information, digital lives and ethics of artificial intelligence.
Methodology / design – We apply mixed innovative methodology which integrates bibliometric analyses, qualitative analysis of data from the experts' discussion and conceptual modelling. The design of the study is related to the structure of a Delphi study. The starting point is based on content analyses of selected published works on information ethics, meta-analyses and conceptual modelling.
Results – We present a conceptual model of the structured topics of information ethics and a model of conceptual representations of ethics of digital information We have identified topical diversity and multidimensionality of information ethics. The perspective topics of information ethics include ethics of artificial intelligence, data ethics, ethics of information literacy, protection of privacy and information security. Results of the discourse analysis of online discussion of 6 experts focused on future of information ethics. Experts identified ethical crisis, risks of artificial intelligence and possible means for solution of ethical issues. Comparison of resulting topics lead to the design of a multidimensional model of ethical challenges of digital information and a model of ethical factors of human information interactions.
Value / originality – The proposed models can be used for design of ethical features of systems and services and for future research. We recommend value sensitive design focused on moral imagination and moral literacy. For prospective research of information ethics, the focus is formed by ethical sensitivity and ethical awareness of communities and collaboration of different actors (research, online platforms, etc.). In conclusions we propose closer collaboration of disciplines in solving transdisciplinary issues of information ethics (information science, computer science, cognitive sciences, psychology, humanities and social sciences). We emphasize the significance of innovative methodological approaches to studies of information ethics focused mainly on studies of context and values of information, digital lives and ethics of artificial intelligence.
slo
eng
Note
Príspevok bol spracovaný v rámci projektu VEGA 1/0360/21 Sociálne reprezentácie etických výziev digitálnej informačnej revolúcie.
Reference
[1] ACRL (2016). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. In: American Library Association. 1996–2019. [online]. Association of College and Research Libraries. Available from: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
[2] Agarwal, Naresh K. (2022). Exploring Context in Information Behavior. Seeker, Situation, Surroundings and Shared Identities. Cham: Springer Nature 2022. 163 p. ISBN 978-3-031-01185-6.
[3] Agarwal, N. K. a Alsaeedi, F. (2021). Creation, dissemination and mitigation: toward a disinformation behavior framework and model In: Aslib Journal of Information Management, Vol. 73, No. 5, 639-658. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AJIM-01-2021-0034/full/html | DOI 10.1108/ajim-01-2021-0034
[4] Bawden, David and Lyn Robinson (2022). Introduction to Information Science. 2nd ed. London: Facet Publishing 2022. 386 s. ISBN 978-1-78330-495-0.
[5] Bawden, D. and L. Robinson (2020). The dearest of our possessions: Applying Floridi's information privacy concept in models of information behavior and information literacy In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2020, 1–14. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24367. | DOI 10.1002/asi.24367
[6] Brännback, M., S. Nikou and H. Bouwman (2017). Value systems and the intentions to interact in social media: the digital natives In: Telematics and Informatics. Vol. 34, iss. 4, pp. 365–381. | DOI 10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.018
[7] Bruce, Ch. (2016). Information Literacy Research: Dimensions of the Emerging Collective Consciousness, Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 47:4, 220-238, DOI: 10.1080/00048623.2016.1253423 | DOI 10.1080/00048623.2016.1253423
[8] Bruce, C., M. Sommerville, I. Stoodeley, I. and H. Partridge (2013). Diversifying Information Literacy Research: An Informed Learning Perspective In: Hepworth, M., Walton, G. (eds.). Developing People‘s Information Capabilities: Fostering Information Literacy in Educational, Workplace and Community Contexts, 223–440. Emerald, London. | DOI 10.1108/s1876-0562(2013)0000008018
[9] Burnett, K. and G. Burnett (2019). Information domains, information ethics. In: Information Research, 24, (4), paper colis1942. Available from: http://InformationR.net/ir/24-4/colis/colis1942.html
[10] Capurro, R. (2005). Information Ethics. In: CSI Communications, 2005, 7-10.
[11] Capurro, R. (2013). Information Ethics. In: Byron Kaldis (ed.). Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Sage Publ, Vol. 1, pp. 471–473.
[12] Capurro, R. (2019). Ethical Issues of Humanoid-Human Interaction In: Ambarish Goswami and Prahlad Vadakkepat (eds.). Humanoid Robotics: A Reference [online]. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 2421–2435. Available from: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-94-007-6046-2_127, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6046-2_127 | DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6046-2_127
[13] Capurro, R. and Ch. Pingel (2002). Ethical Issues of Online Communication Research. In: Ethics and Information Technology. 2002, 4 (3), 189–194. Available from: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-94-007-6046-2_127
[14] Carbo, T. and M. M. Smith (2008). Global information ethics: intercultural perspectives on past and future research, In:JASIST, 59 (7), 1111–1123.
[15] Chu, H. (2015). Research methods in library and information science: A content analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 37(1).
[16] Davenport, T. D. (2018). The AI Advantage. How to Put the Artificial Intelligence Revolution to Work. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2018. 231 s. ISBN 978-0-262-03917-8.
[17] Dervin, B. (2005). What Methodology Does to Theory: Sense-Making Methodology as Exemplar. In: Fisher, K. et al. (eds.). Theories of Information Behavior. Medford: Information Today, 185–190.
[18] Ess, Ch. (2014). Digital Media Ethics. 2nd ed. Polity Press 2014. ISBN 143978-0-7456-5606-9.
[19] Fázik, J. (2021). Návrh rámca informačnej gramotnosti absolventov stredných škôl. Rigorózna práca. Bratislava: FiFUK KKIV 2021. 171 s.
[20] Fallis, D. (2015). What is Disinformation? In: Library Trends, 2015, Vol. 63, No. 3, 401–426. Dostupné na: 10.1353/lib.2015.0014 | DOI 10.1353/lib.2015.0014
[21] Fallis, D. (2007). Information Ethics for the 21st century library professionals Library Hi Tech, 25, (1), 23–36. | DOI 10.1108/07378830710735830
[22] Floridi, L. (2010). Information: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2010. 130 s. ISBN 978-0-19-955137-8.
[23] Floridi, L. (2011). The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011. ISBN 978-0-19-923238-3.
[24] Floridi, L. (2013). The Ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199641321.
[25] Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199606726.
[26] Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, Ch., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People – An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles and Recommendations Mind and Machines (2018), 28: 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 | DOI 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
[27] Floridi, L. (2019). The logics of information: a theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-883363-5.
[28] Forster, M. (2013). Information literacy as a facilitator of ethical practice in the professions. In: Journal of Information Literacy, 7, (1), 18–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.11645/7.1.1783
[29] Forster, M. (2017). (ed.). Information Literacy in the Workplace. London: Facet 2017. 189 s. ISBN 978-1-78330-132-4.
[30] FOUNDATIONS of Information Ethics. (2019). Ed. By J. T. F. Burgess, E. J. M. Knox. London: ALA, Facet 2019. 156 p.
[31] Friedman, B. and N. G. Freier (2005). Value Sensitive design. In: Fisher et al. (eds.). Theories of Information Behavior. Medford: Information Today, 2005, 368-272.
[32] Friedman, B. and D. G. Hendry (2019). Value Sensitive Design. Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. Cambridge (Ma): MIT Press 2019. 229 p. ISBN 9780262039536.
[33] Froelich, T. (2004). Information Ethics. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. New York, Taylor and Francis 2004, 256–258.
[34] Fuchs, Ch. (2016). Information Ethics in the Age of Digital Labour and the Surveillance-Industrial Complex In: Kelly, M. and J. Bielby. (Eds.), Information Cultures in the Digital Age: A Festschrift in Honor of Rafael Capurro. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 173–190. ISBN 978-3-658-14679-5. | DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_1
[35] Goguen, J. A. (1997). Towards a Social, Ethical Theory of Information. In: Social Science Research, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. Ed. By G. Bowker, L. Glassier, L. Starr, W. Turner. Erlbaum, 1997, 27–56.
[36] Himma, K. E. and H. T. Tavani (Eds.) (2008). The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-0-471-79959-7.
[37] Huvila, I., H. Enwald, N. Hirvonen and K. Erickson-Backa (2019). The concept of usefulness in library and information science. In: Proceedings of CoLIS, Information Research [online]. 24(4). Available from: http://InformationR.net/ir/24-4/colis/colis1907.html
[38] Jacobson, Trudi E. and Thomas P. MacKey (2016). Metaliteracy in Practice. Chicago: ALA-Neal Schuman 2016. 224 p. ISBN 978-0-8389-1379-6.
[39] Järvelin, K. & Vakkari, P. (2022). LIS research across 50 years: Content analysis of journal articles In: Journal of Documentation, vol. 7, 78, (1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2021-0062 | DOI 10.1108/jd-03-2021-0062
[40] Karlova, N. A. and K. E. Fisher (2014). A social diffusion model of misinformation and disinformation for understanding human information behavior. In Information Research, 18(1) paper 573. Available from: http://InformationR.net/ir/18-1/paper573.html
[41] Kelly, M. and J. Bielby (eds.) (2016). Information Cultures in the Digital Age. A Festschrift in Honor of Rafael Capurro. Wiesbaden: Springer 2016. 479 s. ISBN 978-3-658-14679-5. http://www.capurro.de/onres.htm.-6046-2_127
[42] Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H. and J. Cook (2017). Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the "Post-truth" Era Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Vol. 6 (4), 353–369. DOI 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008 |
[43] MacKey, T. P. and T. R. Jacobson (2019). Metaliterate Learning for the Post-truth World. Chicago: ALA 2019. 230 p. ISBN 978-0-8389-1776-3.
[44] Marchionini, G. (2008). Human-information interaction research and development. In: Library and Information Science Research. Vol. 30 (3), 165-174.
[45] Losee, R. M. (2014). Information and knowledge: Combining justification, truth, and belief In: Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline [online]. Vol. 17, pp. 75–93. Available from: http://www.inform.nu/Articles/Vol17/ISJv17p075-093Losee0495.pdf | DOI 10.28945/1950
[46] Lloyd, A. (2021). The Qualitative Landscape of Information Literacy Research. Perspectives, Methods and Techniques. London: Facet 2021. 152 p.
[47] Rubin, R. and Froelich, T. J. (2010). Ethical Aspects of Library and Information Science. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. 3rd ed. New York: Taylor and Francis, 1743–1757.
[48] Ruokolainen, H. a G. Widén (2020). Conceptualisation of misinformation in the context of asylum seekers. In Information Processing and Management, Vol. 57, (3), 102–127. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102127
[49] Savolainen, R. (2022). What drives people to prefer health-related misinformation? The viewpoint of motivated reasoning Information Research, 27(2), paper 927. Dostupné na: http://InformationR.net/ir/27-2/paper927.html, https://doi.org/10.47989/irpaper927 | DOI 10.47989/irpaper927
[50] Savolainen, R. (2021). Expert power as a constituent of opinion leadership: a conceptual analysis. In: Information Research [online]. 26(2). Available from: http://InformationR.net/ir/26-2/paper898.html
[51] Secker, J. and E. Coonan (2013). Rethinking Information Literacy: A Practical Framework for Supporting Learning. London: Facet 2013.
[52] Secker, J. (2011). A New Curriculum for Information Literacy: Expert Consultation Report [online]. Cambridge University Library. Available from: http://ccfil.pbworks.com/f/Expert_report_final.pdf
[53] Søe, S. O. (2018). Algorithmic Detection of misinformation and disinformation: Gricean perspectives In: Journal of Documentation. Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 309–332. DOI 10.1108/JD-05-2017-0075. | DOI 10.1108/jd-05-2017-0075
[54] Smutny, Z. and V. Vehovar (2020). Social Informatics Research: Schools of Thought, Methodological Basis, and Thematic Conceptualization In: Journal of ASIST. Vol. 71, Iss. 5, pp. 529–539. | DOI 10.1002/asi.24280
[55] Stahl, B. C. (2021). Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future. An Ecosystem Perspective on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies. London: Springer 2021.
[56] Steinerová, J. (2020a). Etika digitálnych informácií vo svetle sociálnych hodnôt informácií. In: ITLib. Vol. 24, Iss. 2, pp. 6–21. ISSN 1335-793X.
[57] Steinerová, J. (2020b). Etické výzvy digitálneho prostredia v informačnom správaní vedcov In: Plašienková, Z. (ed.). Bioetické výzvy a súčasnosť z pohľadu nových poznatkov a trendov. Bratislava: STIMUL, pp. 230–247. | DOI 10.17846/pc.2019.3.1.84-88
[58] Steinerová, J., J. Fázik a F. Nováková (2020). Prínos fenomenografických výskumov pre informačnú vedu In: ProInFlow, Vol. 12 (2020), No. 1. Dostupné na: http://www.phil.muni.cz/journals/index.php/proinflow/article/view/2020-1-2/2102 | DOI 10.5817/proin2020-1-2
[59] Steinerová, J. (2021a). Etika tvorby informačných produktov v digitálnej revolúcii In: ProInflow: časopis pro informační vědy. Vol. 13, No. 1, 2021. 64–86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5817/ProIn2021-1-4 | DOI 10.5817/proin2021-1-4
[60] Steinerová, J. (2021b). Theoretical Constructs of Information Science: Development towards Ecological Paradigms and Information Ethics in Digital Environment. In: Zborník KIV 29. Annual Review of LIS 29. Eds. J. Steinerová, M. Pastierová. Bratislava, UK 2021, 9-38.
[61] Steinerová, J. (2022a). Etické faktory informačných interakcií človeka. Knihovna: knihovnická revue. 2022, 33 (1), 5-29. ISSN 1801-3252.
[62] Steinerová, Jela (2022b). Delfská štúdia o informačnej etike: výsledky analýz diskurzu In: ITLib, 2022, č. 3/4, s. 5-18. Dostupné aj na: https://itlib.cvtisr.sk/%c4%8cl%c3%a1nky/delfska-studia-o-informacnej-etike-vysledky-analyz-diskurzu/ | DOI 10.52036/1335793x.2022.3-4.5-18
[63] Steinerová, J. (2022c). Ecological and Ethical Contexts of Digital Literacy in the Light of Phenomenographic Studies In: Information Literacy in a Post-Truth Era. Eds. S. Kurbanoglu, S. Špiranec, Y. Ünal, J. Boustany, D. Kos. 7th European Confer. on Inform. Literacy, ECIL 2021 Rev. Selected Papers. Cham: Springer 2022, 157-166. ISBN 978-3-030-99884-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99885-1 | DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-99885-1_14
[64] Steinerová, Jela a Miriam Ondrišová (eds.) (2020). Informačná veda. Výkladový slovník. Autori: Jela Steinerová, Jaroslav Šušol, Pavol Rankov, Lucia Lichnerová, Ľudmila Hrdináková, Miriam Ondrišová, Marta Špániová, Katarína Buzová, Andrea Hrčková. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2020. 278 s. ISBN 978-80-223-4866-9.
[65] Steinerová, J. (2023). Social and epistemic values of information in the framework of information ethics. In: Knižničná a informačná veda 30. Eds. J. Steinerová, M. Pastierová. Bratislava, UK 2023, s. 9-38.
[66] Steinerová, J. (ed.) (2023). Knižničná a informačná veda 30. Library and Information Science. Annual Review. Vol. 30. Eds. J. Steinerová, M. Pastierová. Bratislava. UK 2023. 252 s. ISBN 978-80-223-5504-9.
[67] Steinerová, J. (2014). Informačná etika v súvislostiach informačnej ekológie. Knihovna. 2014, roč. 25, č. 1, 23–35. Dostupné na: http://knihovna.nkp.cz/knihovna141/141023.htm. ISSN 1801-3252.
[68] Stodola J. (2019). Principy a dilemata informační etiky: svoboda slova, právo na informace a cenzura v kontextu dezinformace In: ProInflow. Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 50–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/ProIn2019-1-6 | DOI 10.5817/proin2019-1-6
[69] Sturges, P. (2009). Information ethics in the twenty-first century In Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 40 (4), 241–242. | DOI 10.1080/00048623.2009.10721415
[70] Timko, M. (2023). Infocentrická ekoeitka a svět (nejenom digitální) z pohledu evoluční ontologie. In: Zborník KIV 30. Eds. J. Steinerová, M. Pastierová. Bratislava: vyd. UK 2023, 196-206.
[71] Tuana, N. (2007). Conceptualizing Moral Literacy. In: Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 45, (4), 364–378. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/uniba/reader.action?docID=10196373
[72] Van Otterlo, M. (2018). Ethics and the Value(s) of Artificial Intelligence. In: NAW. 5/19, (3), pp. 206–209.
[73] Walton, G., Pointon, M., Barker, J., Turner, M. and A. Wilkinson (2021). Information discernment and the psychophysiological effects of misinformation. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.
[74] Vakkari, P., Chang, Yu-Wei, Järvelin, K. (2022). Disciplinary contributions to research topics and methodology in Library and Information Science – leading to fragmentations? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology(2022), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24690
[75] Zwass, V. (2010). Ethical Issues in Information Systems. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. 3rd d. New York: Taylor and Francis, pp. 1758-1767.
[2] Agarwal, Naresh K. (2022). Exploring Context in Information Behavior. Seeker, Situation, Surroundings and Shared Identities. Cham: Springer Nature 2022. 163 p. ISBN 978-3-031-01185-6.
[3] Agarwal, N. K. a Alsaeedi, F. (2021). Creation, dissemination and mitigation: toward a disinformation behavior framework and model In: Aslib Journal of Information Management, Vol. 73, No. 5, 639-658. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AJIM-01-2021-0034/full/html | DOI 10.1108/ajim-01-2021-0034
[4] Bawden, David and Lyn Robinson (2022). Introduction to Information Science. 2nd ed. London: Facet Publishing 2022. 386 s. ISBN 978-1-78330-495-0.
[5] Bawden, D. and L. Robinson (2020). The dearest of our possessions: Applying Floridi's information privacy concept in models of information behavior and information literacy In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2020, 1–14. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24367. | DOI 10.1002/asi.24367
[6] Brännback, M., S. Nikou and H. Bouwman (2017). Value systems and the intentions to interact in social media: the digital natives In: Telematics and Informatics. Vol. 34, iss. 4, pp. 365–381. | DOI 10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.018
[7] Bruce, Ch. (2016). Information Literacy Research: Dimensions of the Emerging Collective Consciousness, Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 47:4, 220-238, DOI: 10.1080/00048623.2016.1253423 | DOI 10.1080/00048623.2016.1253423
[8] Bruce, C., M. Sommerville, I. Stoodeley, I. and H. Partridge (2013). Diversifying Information Literacy Research: An Informed Learning Perspective In: Hepworth, M., Walton, G. (eds.). Developing People‘s Information Capabilities: Fostering Information Literacy in Educational, Workplace and Community Contexts, 223–440. Emerald, London. | DOI 10.1108/s1876-0562(2013)0000008018
[9] Burnett, K. and G. Burnett (2019). Information domains, information ethics. In: Information Research, 24, (4), paper colis1942. Available from: http://InformationR.net/ir/24-4/colis/colis1942.html
[10] Capurro, R. (2005). Information Ethics. In: CSI Communications, 2005, 7-10.
[11] Capurro, R. (2013). Information Ethics. In: Byron Kaldis (ed.). Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Sage Publ, Vol. 1, pp. 471–473.
[12] Capurro, R. (2019). Ethical Issues of Humanoid-Human Interaction In: Ambarish Goswami and Prahlad Vadakkepat (eds.). Humanoid Robotics: A Reference [online]. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 2421–2435. Available from: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-94-007-6046-2_127, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6046-2_127 | DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6046-2_127
[13] Capurro, R. and Ch. Pingel (2002). Ethical Issues of Online Communication Research. In: Ethics and Information Technology. 2002, 4 (3), 189–194. Available from: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-94-007-6046-2_127
[14] Carbo, T. and M. M. Smith (2008). Global information ethics: intercultural perspectives on past and future research, In:JASIST, 59 (7), 1111–1123.
[15] Chu, H. (2015). Research methods in library and information science: A content analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 37(1).
[16] Davenport, T. D. (2018). The AI Advantage. How to Put the Artificial Intelligence Revolution to Work. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2018. 231 s. ISBN 978-0-262-03917-8.
[17] Dervin, B. (2005). What Methodology Does to Theory: Sense-Making Methodology as Exemplar. In: Fisher, K. et al. (eds.). Theories of Information Behavior. Medford: Information Today, 185–190.
[18] Ess, Ch. (2014). Digital Media Ethics. 2nd ed. Polity Press 2014. ISBN 143978-0-7456-5606-9.
[19] Fázik, J. (2021). Návrh rámca informačnej gramotnosti absolventov stredných škôl. Rigorózna práca. Bratislava: FiFUK KKIV 2021. 171 s.
[20] Fallis, D. (2015). What is Disinformation? In: Library Trends, 2015, Vol. 63, No. 3, 401–426. Dostupné na: 10.1353/lib.2015.0014 | DOI 10.1353/lib.2015.0014
[21] Fallis, D. (2007). Information Ethics for the 21st century library professionals Library Hi Tech, 25, (1), 23–36. | DOI 10.1108/07378830710735830
[22] Floridi, L. (2010). Information: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2010. 130 s. ISBN 978-0-19-955137-8.
[23] Floridi, L. (2011). The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011. ISBN 978-0-19-923238-3.
[24] Floridi, L. (2013). The Ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199641321.
[25] Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199606726.
[26] Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, Ch., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People – An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles and Recommendations Mind and Machines (2018), 28: 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 | DOI 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
[27] Floridi, L. (2019). The logics of information: a theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-883363-5.
[28] Forster, M. (2013). Information literacy as a facilitator of ethical practice in the professions. In: Journal of Information Literacy, 7, (1), 18–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.11645/7.1.1783
[29] Forster, M. (2017). (ed.). Information Literacy in the Workplace. London: Facet 2017. 189 s. ISBN 978-1-78330-132-4.
[30] FOUNDATIONS of Information Ethics. (2019). Ed. By J. T. F. Burgess, E. J. M. Knox. London: ALA, Facet 2019. 156 p.
[31] Friedman, B. and N. G. Freier (2005). Value Sensitive design. In: Fisher et al. (eds.). Theories of Information Behavior. Medford: Information Today, 2005, 368-272.
[32] Friedman, B. and D. G. Hendry (2019). Value Sensitive Design. Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. Cambridge (Ma): MIT Press 2019. 229 p. ISBN 9780262039536.
[33] Froelich, T. (2004). Information Ethics. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. New York, Taylor and Francis 2004, 256–258.
[34] Fuchs, Ch. (2016). Information Ethics in the Age of Digital Labour and the Surveillance-Industrial Complex In: Kelly, M. and J. Bielby. (Eds.), Information Cultures in the Digital Age: A Festschrift in Honor of Rafael Capurro. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 173–190. ISBN 978-3-658-14679-5. | DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_1
[35] Goguen, J. A. (1997). Towards a Social, Ethical Theory of Information. In: Social Science Research, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. Ed. By G. Bowker, L. Glassier, L. Starr, W. Turner. Erlbaum, 1997, 27–56.
[36] Himma, K. E. and H. T. Tavani (Eds.) (2008). The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-0-471-79959-7.
[37] Huvila, I., H. Enwald, N. Hirvonen and K. Erickson-Backa (2019). The concept of usefulness in library and information science. In: Proceedings of CoLIS, Information Research [online]. 24(4). Available from: http://InformationR.net/ir/24-4/colis/colis1907.html
[38] Jacobson, Trudi E. and Thomas P. MacKey (2016). Metaliteracy in Practice. Chicago: ALA-Neal Schuman 2016. 224 p. ISBN 978-0-8389-1379-6.
[39] Järvelin, K. & Vakkari, P. (2022). LIS research across 50 years: Content analysis of journal articles In: Journal of Documentation, vol. 7, 78, (1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2021-0062 | DOI 10.1108/jd-03-2021-0062
[40] Karlova, N. A. and K. E. Fisher (2014). A social diffusion model of misinformation and disinformation for understanding human information behavior. In Information Research, 18(1) paper 573. Available from: http://InformationR.net/ir/18-1/paper573.html
[41] Kelly, M. and J. Bielby (eds.) (2016). Information Cultures in the Digital Age. A Festschrift in Honor of Rafael Capurro. Wiesbaden: Springer 2016. 479 s. ISBN 978-3-658-14679-5. http://www.capurro.de/onres.htm.-6046-2_127
[42] Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H. and J. Cook (2017). Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the "Post-truth" Era Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Vol. 6 (4), 353–369. DOI 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008 |
[43] MacKey, T. P. and T. R. Jacobson (2019). Metaliterate Learning for the Post-truth World. Chicago: ALA 2019. 230 p. ISBN 978-0-8389-1776-3.
[44] Marchionini, G. (2008). Human-information interaction research and development. In: Library and Information Science Research. Vol. 30 (3), 165-174.
[45] Losee, R. M. (2014). Information and knowledge: Combining justification, truth, and belief In: Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline [online]. Vol. 17, pp. 75–93. Available from: http://www.inform.nu/Articles/Vol17/ISJv17p075-093Losee0495.pdf | DOI 10.28945/1950
[46] Lloyd, A. (2021). The Qualitative Landscape of Information Literacy Research. Perspectives, Methods and Techniques. London: Facet 2021. 152 p.
[47] Rubin, R. and Froelich, T. J. (2010). Ethical Aspects of Library and Information Science. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. 3rd ed. New York: Taylor and Francis, 1743–1757.
[48] Ruokolainen, H. a G. Widén (2020). Conceptualisation of misinformation in the context of asylum seekers. In Information Processing and Management, Vol. 57, (3), 102–127. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102127
[49] Savolainen, R. (2022). What drives people to prefer health-related misinformation? The viewpoint of motivated reasoning Information Research, 27(2), paper 927. Dostupné na: http://InformationR.net/ir/27-2/paper927.html, https://doi.org/10.47989/irpaper927 | DOI 10.47989/irpaper927
[50] Savolainen, R. (2021). Expert power as a constituent of opinion leadership: a conceptual analysis. In: Information Research [online]. 26(2). Available from: http://InformationR.net/ir/26-2/paper898.html
[51] Secker, J. and E. Coonan (2013). Rethinking Information Literacy: A Practical Framework for Supporting Learning. London: Facet 2013.
[52] Secker, J. (2011). A New Curriculum for Information Literacy: Expert Consultation Report [online]. Cambridge University Library. Available from: http://ccfil.pbworks.com/f/Expert_report_final.pdf
[53] Søe, S. O. (2018). Algorithmic Detection of misinformation and disinformation: Gricean perspectives In: Journal of Documentation. Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 309–332. DOI 10.1108/JD-05-2017-0075. | DOI 10.1108/jd-05-2017-0075
[54] Smutny, Z. and V. Vehovar (2020). Social Informatics Research: Schools of Thought, Methodological Basis, and Thematic Conceptualization In: Journal of ASIST. Vol. 71, Iss. 5, pp. 529–539. | DOI 10.1002/asi.24280
[55] Stahl, B. C. (2021). Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future. An Ecosystem Perspective on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies. London: Springer 2021.
[56] Steinerová, J. (2020a). Etika digitálnych informácií vo svetle sociálnych hodnôt informácií. In: ITLib. Vol. 24, Iss. 2, pp. 6–21. ISSN 1335-793X.
[57] Steinerová, J. (2020b). Etické výzvy digitálneho prostredia v informačnom správaní vedcov In: Plašienková, Z. (ed.). Bioetické výzvy a súčasnosť z pohľadu nových poznatkov a trendov. Bratislava: STIMUL, pp. 230–247. | DOI 10.17846/pc.2019.3.1.84-88
[58] Steinerová, J., J. Fázik a F. Nováková (2020). Prínos fenomenografických výskumov pre informačnú vedu In: ProInFlow, Vol. 12 (2020), No. 1. Dostupné na: http://www.phil.muni.cz/journals/index.php/proinflow/article/view/2020-1-2/2102 | DOI 10.5817/proin2020-1-2
[59] Steinerová, J. (2021a). Etika tvorby informačných produktov v digitálnej revolúcii In: ProInflow: časopis pro informační vědy. Vol. 13, No. 1, 2021. 64–86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5817/ProIn2021-1-4 | DOI 10.5817/proin2021-1-4
[60] Steinerová, J. (2021b). Theoretical Constructs of Information Science: Development towards Ecological Paradigms and Information Ethics in Digital Environment. In: Zborník KIV 29. Annual Review of LIS 29. Eds. J. Steinerová, M. Pastierová. Bratislava, UK 2021, 9-38.
[61] Steinerová, J. (2022a). Etické faktory informačných interakcií človeka. Knihovna: knihovnická revue. 2022, 33 (1), 5-29. ISSN 1801-3252.
[62] Steinerová, Jela (2022b). Delfská štúdia o informačnej etike: výsledky analýz diskurzu In: ITLib, 2022, č. 3/4, s. 5-18. Dostupné aj na: https://itlib.cvtisr.sk/%c4%8cl%c3%a1nky/delfska-studia-o-informacnej-etike-vysledky-analyz-diskurzu/ | DOI 10.52036/1335793x.2022.3-4.5-18
[63] Steinerová, J. (2022c). Ecological and Ethical Contexts of Digital Literacy in the Light of Phenomenographic Studies In: Information Literacy in a Post-Truth Era. Eds. S. Kurbanoglu, S. Špiranec, Y. Ünal, J. Boustany, D. Kos. 7th European Confer. on Inform. Literacy, ECIL 2021 Rev. Selected Papers. Cham: Springer 2022, 157-166. ISBN 978-3-030-99884-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99885-1 | DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-99885-1_14
[64] Steinerová, Jela a Miriam Ondrišová (eds.) (2020). Informačná veda. Výkladový slovník. Autori: Jela Steinerová, Jaroslav Šušol, Pavol Rankov, Lucia Lichnerová, Ľudmila Hrdináková, Miriam Ondrišová, Marta Špániová, Katarína Buzová, Andrea Hrčková. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2020. 278 s. ISBN 978-80-223-4866-9.
[65] Steinerová, J. (2023). Social and epistemic values of information in the framework of information ethics. In: Knižničná a informačná veda 30. Eds. J. Steinerová, M. Pastierová. Bratislava, UK 2023, s. 9-38.
[66] Steinerová, J. (ed.) (2023). Knižničná a informačná veda 30. Library and Information Science. Annual Review. Vol. 30. Eds. J. Steinerová, M. Pastierová. Bratislava. UK 2023. 252 s. ISBN 978-80-223-5504-9.
[67] Steinerová, J. (2014). Informačná etika v súvislostiach informačnej ekológie. Knihovna. 2014, roč. 25, č. 1, 23–35. Dostupné na: http://knihovna.nkp.cz/knihovna141/141023.htm. ISSN 1801-3252.
[68] Stodola J. (2019). Principy a dilemata informační etiky: svoboda slova, právo na informace a cenzura v kontextu dezinformace In: ProInflow. Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 50–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/ProIn2019-1-6 | DOI 10.5817/proin2019-1-6
[69] Sturges, P. (2009). Information ethics in the twenty-first century In Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 40 (4), 241–242. | DOI 10.1080/00048623.2009.10721415
[70] Timko, M. (2023). Infocentrická ekoeitka a svět (nejenom digitální) z pohledu evoluční ontologie. In: Zborník KIV 30. Eds. J. Steinerová, M. Pastierová. Bratislava: vyd. UK 2023, 196-206.
[71] Tuana, N. (2007). Conceptualizing Moral Literacy. In: Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 45, (4), 364–378. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/uniba/reader.action?docID=10196373
[72] Van Otterlo, M. (2018). Ethics and the Value(s) of Artificial Intelligence. In: NAW. 5/19, (3), pp. 206–209.
[73] Walton, G., Pointon, M., Barker, J., Turner, M. and A. Wilkinson (2021). Information discernment and the psychophysiological effects of misinformation. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.
[74] Vakkari, P., Chang, Yu-Wei, Järvelin, K. (2022). Disciplinary contributions to research topics and methodology in Library and Information Science – leading to fragmentations? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology(2022), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24690
[75] Zwass, V. (2010). Ethical Issues in Information Systems. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. 3rd d. New York: Taylor and Francis, pp. 1758-1767.