Potential causes of ritual instability in doctrinal new religious movements : a cognitive hypothesis

Název: Potential causes of ritual instability in doctrinal new religious movements : a cognitive hypothesis
Zdrojový dokument: Sacra. 2009, roč. 7, č. 2, s. 82-92
Rozsah
82-92
  • ISSN
    1214-5351 (print)
    2336-4483 (online)
Type: Článek
Jazyk
Licence: Neurčená licence
 

Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.

Abstrakt(y)
Within the animal kingdom, hierarchical social structures appear in very similar forms, even if the organisms that make up the social structure differ drastically. Hierarchical social structures and apparent power centralization patterns can be witnessed in insects such as ants and bees, avian species such as chickens and vultures, and mammals such as wolves and humans. Here, an attempt will be made to apply conceptions and terminology of evolutionary theory, concerning alpha male, charismatic leaders in new religious movements (nrms), and cognitive psychology in an interdisciplinary explanation for ritual instability while testing established ritual hypotheses. This will be done by hypothesizing how charismatic alphas attain their status within religious groups and how this presence affects the ritual stability of the group from a cognitive level.
Reference
[1] Barrett, J. 2004. Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[2] Boyer, P. 2002. Religion Explained. New York: Basic Books.

[3] Bulbulia, J. – Sosis, R. – Harris, E. – Genet, R. – Wyman, K. 2008. The Evolution of Religion: Studies, Theories, and Critiques. Santa Margariga – California: The Collins Foundation Press.

[4] Burkert, W. 1996. Creation of the Sacred: Tracks of Biology In Early Religons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

[5] Hinde, R. A. 2005. "Modes Theory: Some Theoretical Considerations." In: Whitehouse, H. – McCauley R. N. (eds.), Mind and Religion: Psychological and Cognitive Foundations of Religiosity. New York: AltaMire Press, 31–56.

[6] Kirckpatrick, L. A. 2004. Attachment, Evolution, and the Psychology of Religion. New York: The Guilford Press.

[7] Lalich, J. 2004. Bounded Choice. Berkeley: University of California Press.

[8] Layton, D. 1999. Seductive Poison. Garden City: Anchor.

[9] Martin, L. H. 2001. "Comparitivism and Sociobiological Theory." Numen 48, 290–308. | DOI 10.1163/156852701752245587

[10] McCauley, R. – Lawson, E. T. 2002. Bringing Ritual to Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[11] McGehee, F. 2008. "Death Tape" (Q042): FBI Transcription. The Jonestown Institute. Available to online access at: http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/AboutJonestown/Tapes/Tapes/DeathTape/Q042fbi.html ; [Accessed on 7 May 2008].

[12] Moore, R. 1985. A Sympathetic History of Jonestown: The Moore Family Involvement in the People's Temple. Studies in Religion and Society, Vol. 4. Lewiston, New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.

[13] Paden, W. E. 2001. "Universals Revisited: Human Behaviors and Cultural Variations." Numen 48, 276–289. | DOI 10.1163/156852701752245578

[14] Paden, W. E. 2008. "Connecting with Evolutionary Models: New Patterns in Comparative Religion?" In: Braun, W. – McCutcheon, R. T. (eds.), Introducing Religion: Essays in Honor of Jonathan Z. Smith. London: Equinox Press, 406–417.

[15] Sørensen, J. 2005. "Charisma, Tradition, and Ritual: A Cognitive Approach to Magical Agency." In: Whitehouse, H. – McCauley R. N. (eds.), Mind and Religion: Psychological and Cognitive Foundations of Religiosity. New York: AltaMire Press, 167–186.

[16] Stark, R. – Bainbridge, W. S. 1987. A Theory of Religion. New York: Peter Lang.

[17] Tremlin, T. 2006. Minds and God. Oxfordshire: Oxford University Press.

[18] Weber, M. 1947. Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by A. R. Anderson and Talcott Parsons. New York: Oxford University Press.

[19] Whitehouse, H. 2004a. Modes of Religiosity. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

[20] Whitehouse, H. 2004b. "Theorizing Religions Past." In: Whitehouse, H. – Martin, L. H. (eds.), Theorizing Religions Past: Archaeology, History, and Cognition. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press. 215–241.

[21] Whitehouse, H. – McCauley R. N. (eds.), 2005. Mind and Religion: Psychological and Cognitive Foundations of Religiosity. New York: AltaMire Press.