Zur Problematik der Akzentqualität im klassischen Latein

Autor: Adamik, Béla
Zdrojový dokument: Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2013, roč. 18, č. 1, s. [3]-22
  • ISSN
    1803-7402 (print)
    2336-4424 (online)
Type: Článek
Licence: Neurčená licence
From among the earlier alternative, opposing views on the quality, i.e. the phonetic background of the Latin word accent, only the theory of the so-called German school ("Deutsche Schule und Theorie") is widespread in our days. According to this theory, a vigorous stress accent prevailed in the classical period, as well as in the preceding and in the subsequent periods of the history of the Latin language. A reconsideration of the (linguistic, metalinguistic, metrical and typological) arguments for a vigorous stress accent assumed for the classical period however suggests that the classical Latin word accent has to be identified rather as a type of weak stress accent or pitch accent.
[1] Adamik, Béla. 2011. Periodization of Latin: an Old Question Revisited. In: Haverling, Gerd. [ed.]. Recent Trends in Latin Linguistics. Proceedings of the 16th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Uppsala, 6th–11th June 2011. Studia Latina Upsaliensia: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. (im Druck).

[2] Allen, W. Sidney. 1973. Prosodic Features of Latin and Greek: A Study in Theory and Reconstruction. Cambridge.

[3] Baldi, Philip. 2002. The Foundations of Latin. Berlin ‒ New York.

[4] Banfi, Emanuele. 1996. Tendenze romanze comuni I. Fonetica. In: Holtus, G. et al. [eds.]. Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik 2,1. Tübingen, 163‒199.

[5] Bartonĕk, Antonín. 1996. Das lateinische Vokalsystem. In: Bammesberger, Alfred. ‒ Heberlein, Friedrich. [eds.]. Akten des VIII. internationalen Kolloquiums zur lateinischen Linguistik. Heidelberg, 117‒124.

[6] Fortson, Benjamin W. 2011. Latin Prosody and Metrics. In: Clackson, James. [ed.]. A Companion to the Latin Language. Malden ‒ Oxford ‒ Chichester, 92‒104.

[7] Fox, Anthony. 2000. Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure. The Phonology of Suprasegmentals. Oxford.

[8] Gósy, Mária. 2004. Fonetika, a beszéd tudománya. Budapest.

[9] Hanson, Kristin. ‒ Kiparsky Paul. 1996. A Parametric Theory of Poetic Meter, Language 72, 287‒335. | DOI 10.2307/416652

[10] Herman, József. 2000. Vulgar Latin. Pennsylvania.

[11] Hofmann, Johann. B. ‒ Szantyr, Anton. 1972. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. München.

[12] Jacobs, Haike. 2004. Rhythmic vowel deletion in OT: Syncope in Latin, Probus 16, 63–90.

[13] Kassai, Ilona. 2005. Fonetika. Budapest.

[14] Keil, Heinrich. [ed.]. 1864. Grammatici Latini 4. Leipzig.

[15] Keil, Heinrich. [ed.]. 1923. Grammatici Latini 5. Leipzig.

[16] Lehiste, Ilse. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge ‒ London.

[17] Lepscky, Giulio. C. 1962. Il problema dell'accento latino. Rassegna critica di studi sull'accento latino e sullo studio dell'accento. ASNP 31, 199‒246.

[18] Leumann, Manu. 1977. Lateinische Laut‒ und Formenlehre. München.

[19] Lienard, Edmond. 1982. Accent tonique et hexamètre dactylique. In: Hellegouarch, Joseph. [ed.]. L'Accent latin: colloque de Morigny, 19 mai 1979. Paris, 6‒19.

[20] Loporcaro, Michele. 2011. Syllable, Segment and Prosody. In: Maiden, M. ‒ Smith, J. C. ‒ Ledgeway, Adam. [eds.]. The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages: Volume 1, Structures, Cambridge, 50‒108, 684‒689.

[21] Mariner Bigorra, Sebastián. 1992. Fonetica Latina. Madrid.

[22] Marrotta, Giovanna. 2006. L'Algoritmo accentuale latino nel confronto di due teorie fonologhice. In: Oniga, Renato ‒ Zennaro, Luigi. [eds.]. Atti della Giornata di Linguistica Latina. Venezia 7. maggio 2004. Venezia, 133‒158.

[23] McCullagh, Matthew. 2011. The Sounds of Latin: Phonology. In: Clackson, J. [ed.]. A Companion to the Latin Language. Malden ‒ Oxford ‒ Chichester, 83‒91.

[24] Meiser, Gerhard. 1998. Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache. Darmstadt.

[25] Niedermann, Max. 1953. Historische Lautlehre des Lateinischen. Paris.

[26] Norberg, Dag. 1958. Introduction a l'étude de la versification latine médiévale. Stockholm.

[27] Sihler, Andrew. L. 1995. New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin. New York ‒ Oxford.

[28] Siptár, Péter. ‒ Törkenczy, Miklós. 2000. The Phonology of Hungarian. Oxford.

[29] Sommer, Ferdinand. 1914. Kritische Erläuterungen zur lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre. Heidelberg.

[30] Sturtevant, Edgar. H. 1940. The Pronunciation of Greek and Latin. Philadelphia.

[31] Sussex, Roland. ‒ Cubberley, Paul. 2006. The Slavic Languages. Cambridge.

[32] Vaníková, Martina. 2010. The Saturnian verse. A new attempt at the establishment of its metric structure. In Anreiter, Peter. ‒ Kienpointer, Manfred. [edd.]. Latin Linguistics Today, Akten des 15. Internationalen Kolloquiums zur Lateinischen Linguistik, Innsbruck, 4.‒9. April 2009. Innsbruck, 87‒100.

[33] Varga, László. 1998. Rhythmical Variation in Hungarian. Phonology 15, 227‒266. | DOI 10.1017/S0952675798003583

[34] Varga, László. 2002. Intonation and Stress: Evidence from Hungarian. New York.

[35] Väänänen, Veikko. 1966. Le latin vulgaire des inscriptions pompéiennes. Berlin.

[36] Väänänen, Veikko. 1981. Introduction au latin vulgaire. Paris.

[37] Vine, Brent. 2012. "PIE mobile accent in Italic: Further evidence". In: Whitehead, Benedict. N. et al [eds.]. The sound of Indo-European: Phonetics, phonemics, and morphophonemics. Copenhagen, 545‒575.

[38] Vroomen, Jean. ‒ Tuomainen, Jyrki. ‒ de Gelder, Beatrice. 1998. The Roles of Word Stress and Vowel Harmony in Speech Segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language 38, 133–149. | DOI 10.1006/jmla.1997.2548

[39] Weiss, Michael. 2009. Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin. Ann Arbor ‒ New York.

[40] Zeleny, Karin. 2008. Itali Modi. Akzentrhythmen in der lateinischen Dichtung der augusteischen Zeit. Wien.