Cognitive phenomenology: the promising pragmatic marriage of methodologies in the field of theatre studies?

Autor: Motal, Jan
Zdrojový dokument: Theatralia. 2016, roč. 19, č. 2, s. 59-75
  • ISSN
    1803-845X (print)
    2336-4548 (online)
Type: Článek
Licence: Neurčená licence
The article presents cognitive phenomenology as a new methodological possibility for the humanities, and especially theatre studies, avoiding communication theory reductionism. The author adapts the perspective of amalgamated mind (ROWLANDS 2010), and elaborates its usefulness for the study of art. The article also interprets Aristotle's practical wisdom as a concept fully compatible with the cognitive perspective, and shows that the cognitive perspective should not be contradictory to the phenomenological one. The relation of phenomenality to the amalgamated mind is also discussed. The author concludes that the 'marriage of methodologies' will be successful, but only if the irreducible natures of phenomenality and embodied mind are preserved.
[1] AQUINAS, Thomas. 1880. S. Thomae Aquinatis Summa Theologica: Tomus secundus [St. Thomas Aquinas Summa Theologica. The Second Book]. Paris: Bloud & Barral, 1880.

[2] ARISTOTLE. 2011. Nicomachean Ethics. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, 2011.

[3] BACHELARD, Gaston. 1968. Le nouvel esprit scientifique [The New Scientific Spirit]. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1968.

[4] BANDURA, Albert. 1977. Social Learning Theory. New-Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1977.

[5] BRETON, Philippe. 1997. L'utopie de la communication [The Utopia of Communication]. Paris: La Découverte, 1997.

[6] BRETON, Philippe. 2011. La sacralisation de l'information. ESSACHESS: Journal for Communication Studies 4 (2011): 2: 59–67.

[7] CARROLL, Noël. 1996. Moderate Moralism. British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (1996): 3: 223–38. | DOI 10.1093/bjaesthetics/36.3.223

[8] CARROLL, Noël. 2000. Art and the Domain of the Aesthetic. British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (2000): 191–208. | DOI 10.1093/bjaesthetics/40.2.191

[9] COLOMBETTI, Giovanna. 2014. The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2014.

[10] DELAMER, John and Amanad WARD (eds.). 2013. Handbook of Social Psychology. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013.

[11] DI DIO, Cinzia and Vittorio GALLESE. 2009. Neuroaesthetics: a review. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 19 (2009): 6: 682–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.001. | DOI 10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.001

[12] DISSANAYAKE, Ellen. 1999. Homo Aestheticus: Where Art Comes From and Why. Seattle/London: University of Washington Press, 1999.

[13] EINSTEIN, Albert and Leopold INFELD. 1966. The Evolution of Physics: From Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta. New York: Touchstone, 1966.

[14] FAIRCLOUGH, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language. London/New York: Longman, 1995.

[15] FELDMAN, Jerome A. 2010. Cognitive Science Should Be Unified: Comments on Griffiths et al. and McClelland et al. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (2010): 341. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.008. | DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.008

[16] FICHTE, J. G. 2000. Foundations of Natural Right: According the the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre. Ed. by F. Neuhouser. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

[17] FINNIGAN, Bronwyn. 2014. Phronesis in Aristotle: Reconciling Deliberation with Spontaneity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (19 JUN 2014). DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12126. | DOI 10.1111/phpr.12126

[18] FISKE, John and John HARTLEY. 2003. Reading Television. London/New York: Routledge, 2003.

[19] FREEDBERG, David and Vittorio GALLESE. 2007. Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (2007): 5: 197–203. DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003. | DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003

[20] GADAMER, Hans-Georg. 1990. Gesammelte Werke 1: Hermeneutik I: Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik [Truth and Method]. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1990.

[21] GIJSBERS, Victor. 2016. Explanatory Pluralism and the (Dis)Unity of Science: The Argument from Incompatible Counterfactual Consequences. Frontiers in Psychiatry 7 (2016): 32. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00032. | DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00032

[22] HAVLÍČKOVÁ KYSOVÁ, Šárka. 2015. Metafory, kterými hrajeme. Perspektivy a meze české kognitivní teatrologie [Metaphors We Act by. Perspectives and Challenges of Czech Cognitive Theatre Studies]. Theatralia 18 (2015): 1: 64–84.

[23] HEGEL, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 2013. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Berlin: Michael Holzinger, 2013.

[24] HEIDEGGER, Martin. 1967. Sein und Zeit [Being and Time]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1967.

[25] HUSSERL, Edmund. 1976. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie: Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie [The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy]. Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976.

[26] JANKO, Richard. 1992. From Catharsis to the Aristotelian Mean. In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.). Essays on Aristotle's Poetics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992: 341–58.

[27] KIERAN, Matthew. 2005. Revealing Art. New York: Routledge, 2005.

[28] LATOUR, Bruno. 1991. Nous n'avons jamais été modernes: Essai d'anthropologie symétrique. [We Have Never Been Modern] Paris: La Découverte, 1991.

[29] LUTZ, Antoine. 2004. Introduction – the explanatory gap: To close or to bridge? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (2004): 325–30.

[30] MASSEY, Irving. 2009. The Neural Imagination: Aesthetic and Neuroscientific Approaches to the Arts. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2009.

[31] NEISSER, Ulric. 2014. Cognitive Psychology: Classic Edition. New York/London: Psychology Press, 2014. | DOI 10.4324/9781315736174

[32] REPAŠSKÁ, Lucia. 2015. Dekompozičné princípy v inscenačnej tvorbe [Decomposition in Stage Practice]. Brno: JAMU, 2015.

[33] RESE, Friederike. 2007. Phronesis als Modell der Hermeneutik: Die hermeneutische Aktualität des Aristoteles (GW1, 312–29) [Phronesis as Hermeneutic Model: Aristotle's Hermenautic Aktuality]. In Günter Figal (ed.). Hans-Georg Gadamer: Warheit und Methode. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2007: 127–49.

[34] ROTH, Wolff-Michael. 2004. Cognitive Phenomenology: Marriage of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 5 (2004): 3.

[35] ROWLANDS, Mark. 2010. The New Science of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2010.

[36] ROY, Jean-Michel et al. 2000. Beyond the Gap: An Introduction to Naturalizing Phenomenology. In Jean Petitot et al. Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000: 1–80.

[37] SEARLE, John R. 1980. Minds, Brains, and Programs. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1980): 417–57.

[38] SIEGEL, Jerrold. 2005. The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe since the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

[39] STAM, Henderikus J. 2015. The Neurosciences and the Search for a Unified Psychology: the Science and Esthetics of a Single Framework. Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015): 1–9. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01467. | DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01467

[40] STERNBERG, Robert J. 2009. Cognitive Psychology. Belmont: Wadsworth, 2009.

[41] SUN, Ron (ed.). 2012. Grounding Social Sciences in Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012.

[42] VALENZUELA-MOGUILLANSKY, Camila. 2014. Constructivist Foundations 10 (2014): 1: 108–9.

[43] VARELA, Francisco J. 1996. Neurophenomenology: A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (1996): 4: 330–49.

[44] WEGNER, Daniel M. 2002. The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.

[45] WILSON, Margaret. 2002. Six Views of Embodied Cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (2002): 4: 625–36. | DOI 10.3758/BF03196322

[46] ZAGZEBSKI, Linda Trinkaus. 1996. Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.