Museality at breakfast : the concept of museality in contemporary museological discourse

Title: Museality at breakfast : the concept of museality in contemporary museological discourse
Source document: Museologica Brunensia. 2015, vol. 4, iss. 2, pp. 14-19
  • ISSN
    1805-4722 (print)
    2464-5362 (online)
Type: Article
License: Not specified license

Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.

The concept of museality in contemporary museological discourse After a brief reference to the Stránský-Schreiner controversy of 1983, the paper will focus on the concept of significance as published by the Australian Heritage Collections Council in 2001, trying to answer the question: to what extend does this approach "solve" the Stránský-Schreiner controversy? Via a brief discussion of valuation methods in the sphere of landscape preservation as developed during the 1990s in the United Kingdom, the paper will propose a recent Dutch method of cultural value assessment, published by the Cultural Heritage Agency in 2013, as useful collection management tool, implementing Stránský's concept of museality from an integrated and interdisciplinary perspective.
Po krátkém ohlédnutí za polemikou mezi Stránským a Schreinerem z roku 1983 se příspěvek zaměřuje na koncept signifikance, který publikoval Australský úřad pro kulturní dědictví v roce 2001. Pokouší se přitom najít odpověď na otázku, do jaké míry tento přístup "řeší" dřívější rozpor mezi Stránským a Schreinerem. Prostřednictvím krátké diskuse o metodách zhodnocování v oblasti ochrany krajiny, vyvinutých během 90. let 20. století ve Spojeném království, je ve studii prezentována současná nizozemská metoda posuzování kulturní hodnoty, publikovaná Agenturou pro kulturní dědictví v roce 2013. Metoda je zde představena ve sjednocujícím a interdisciplinárním pohledu jako užitečný nástroj pro spravování sbírek, zohledňující zároveň Stránského koncept muzeality.
[1] APPADURAI, Arjun. The social life of things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

[2] AVRAMI, Erica, Randall MASON and Marta DE LA TORRE. Values and heritage conservation. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute, 2000.

[3] DESVALLÉES, André and François MAIRESSE. Dictionnaire encyclopédique de muséologie. Paris: Armand Collin, 2011, 776 p.

[4] FLÜGEL, Katharine. Einführung in die Museologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2005, 157 p.

[5] FRIJHOFF, Willem. Dynamisch erfgoed. Amsterdam: SUN, 2007, 109 p.

[6] HANSLOK, Andreas. Museologie und Archivwissenschaft in der DDR. Abgrenzung und Annäherung zweier Nachbarwissenschaften. Marburg: Tectum Verlag, 2008.

[7] LATOUR, Bruno. Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987, 274 p.

[8] MAROEVIĆ, Ivo. Introduction to museology – the European approach. München: Verlag Dr. Christian Müller-Straten, 1998, 358 p.

[9] OLDENBURG, Ray. The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How They Get You Through the Day. New York: Paragon House, 1989.

[10] SCHREINER, Klaus. Einführung in die Museologie – ein Beitrag zu den theoretischen Grundlagen der Museumsarbeit. Heft 1. Neubrandenburg: [no publisher], 1982.

[11] SMITH, Laurajane. Uses of heritage. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006, 368 p.

[12] STRÁNSKÝ, Zbyněk Z. Archeologie a muzeologie. Brno: Masarykova univerzita v Brně, 2005, 315 p.

[13] STRÁNSKÝ, Zbyněk Z. Museology. Introduction to the study of museology for the students of the International Summer School of Museology – ISSOM. Brno: Masaryk University, 1995.

[14] THOMASSEN, Theo. Archiefwetenschap, erfgoed en politisering. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers, 2011.

[15] THOMPSON, Michael. Rubbish theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.

[16] Unpacking the collection. Networks of material and social agency in the museum. New York: Springer, 2011.

[17] VAN MENSCH, Peter and Léontine MEIJER-VAN MENSCH. New Trends in Museology. Celje: Muzej novejše zgodovine, 2012.

[18] WAIDACHER, Friedrich. Handbuch der Allgemeinen Museologie. Wien: Böhlau-Verlag, 1993.

[19] ALDRED, Oscar and Graham FAIRCLOUGH. Historic Landscape Characterisation. Taking stock of the method. London: English Heritage, 2003.

[20] ARRHENIUS, Thordis. The Cult of Age in Mass-Society: Alois Riegl's Theory of Conservation. Future Anterior, 2004, vol. 1, iss. 1, p. 75–81.

[21] FAIRCLOUGH, Graham and Lesley MACINNES. Understanding historic landscape character. London/Edinburgh: The Countryside Agency/Scottish Natural Heritage, 2002.

[22] FORSTER, Kurt and Diane GHIRARDO. The modern cult of monuments: its character and origin. Oppositions, 1982, vol. 25, p. 20–51.

[23] KIRSHENBLATT-GIMBLETT, Barbara. Intangible heritage as metacultural production. Museum International, 2004, vol. 56, iss. 1–2, p. 52–65. | DOI 10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00458.x

[24] MASON, Randall. Fixing historic preservation: a constructive critique of significance. Places, 2003, vol. 16, iss. 1, p. 64–71.

[25] PARSONS, Liz. Thompsons' Rubbish Theory: exploring the practices of value creation. European Advances in Consumer Research, 2008, vol. 8, p. 390–393.

[26] SCHOUTEN, Frans. Over het waarderen van erfgoed. Volkscultuur Magazine, 2010, vol. 5, iss. 1, p. 35–37.

[27] (significance). A guide to assessing the significance of cultural heritage objects and collections. Canberra: Heritage Collections Council, 2001.

[28] Significance 2.0. A guide to assessing the significance of collections. Rundle Mall: Collections Council of Australia, 2009.

[29] WULFF, Matthias. Jute-Tüte in Vitrine. Berliner Morgenpost, 19-09-2014.

[30] CROOKE, Elizabeth. Museums and community. In MACDONALD, Sharon (ed.). A companion to museum studies. Chichester: Willey-Blackwell, 2010, p. 16. ISBN 978-1-4443-3405-0.

[31] KOPYTOFF, Igor. The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. In APPADURAI, Arjun. The social life of things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, p. 64–91. ISBN 0-521-35726-8.

[32] MASON, Randall. Assessing values in conservation planning. Methodological issues and choices. In The Heritage Reader. London, New York: Routledge, 2008, p. 99–124.

[33] MEIJER-VAN MENSCH, Léontine and Peter VAN MENSCH. From disciplinary control to co-creation. Collecting and the development of museums as praxis in the nineteenth and twentieth century. In PETTERSON, Susanna, Monika HAGEDORN-SAUPE, Teijamari JYRKKIÖ and Astrid WEIJ. Encouraging collections mobility – a way forward for museums in Europe. Helsinki/Amsterdam/Berlin, 2010, p. 33–53. ISBN 978-951-53-3287-5.

[34] SCHIMPFF, Volker. Musealität in Zeiten des Umbruchs. In Curiositas. Jahrbuch für Museologie und museale Quellenkunde, 2011, vol. 11, p. 58–68.

[35] VAN MENSCH, Peter. "Against all norms and values": dilemmas of collecting controversial objects. In BATTESTI, Jacques. Que reste-t-il du présent? Collecter le contemporain dans les musées du société. Bordeaux: Le Festin, 2012, p. 138–145. ISBN 978-2-36062-064-7.

[36] WALZ, Markus. Erbfallfrei Geerbtes vererben. In KANIASCHÜTZ, Monika. In die Jahre gekommen. Chancen und Potenzialen Kulturhistorischer Museen. Münster, 2009, p. 159–171. ISBN 978-3-8309-2224-7.

[37] AUSTRALIA ICOMOS. Burra Charter// [online]. [cit. 2015-02-10]. Available from www:

[38] Guidelines on Ways of Dealing Relagious Objects [online]. [cit. 2015-02-10]. Available (in English) from www:

[39] LAMER, Annika [online]. [cit. 2015-02-10]. Available from www:

[40] Safeguarding without freezing [online]. [cit. 2015-02-10]. Available from www: