On the grammaticalization of as well as in the history of English

Source document: Brno studies in English. 2019, vol. 45, iss. 1, pp. [5]-24
Extent
[5]-24
  • ISSN
    0524-6881 (print)
    1805-0867 (online)
Type: Article
Language
English
License: Not specified license
Abstract(s)
The English language as it is known today has undergone a number of developments that have changed it throughout time. Among them, grammaticalization stands out because of its relevance in the progress of the language, as it consists in the process by which a lexical word having full meaning becomes a grammatical item. The present paper analyses the process of grammaticalization of the quasi-coordinator as well as in order to ascertain its origin and describe its developmental path, identify the linguistic causes that motivated the change, propose a functional taxonomy of the construction, and evaluate the influence of sociolinguistic factors in the development and standardization of the quasi-coordinator.
Document
References:
[1] Helsinki Corpus of English Texts (1991) Compiled by Rissanen, Matti, Merja Kytö, Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, Matti Kilpiö, Saara Nevanlinna, Irma Taavitsainen, Terttu Nevalainen and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

[2] Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edition (1989) Edited by Simpson, John A. and Edmund Weiner. [CD-Rom]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[3] Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, parsed version (2006) Compiled by Taylor, Ann, Arja Nurmi, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk and Terttu Nevalainen. Helsinki: University of Helsinki and York: University of York.

[4] Conde-Silvestre, Juan C. and Javier Calle-Martín (2015) Zero that-clauses in the history of English: A historical sociolinguistic approach (1424–1681). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1 (1), 57–86. | DOI 10.1515/jhsl-2015-0003

[5] Fisher, John H. (1977) Chancery and the emergence of standard written English in the fifteenth century. Speculum 52 (4), 870–899. | DOI 10.2307/2855378

[6] Fischer, Olga, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (2000) Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

[7] Forbes, Clarissa (2014) On apparent nominal coordination in Gitksan. In: Teddiman, Laura (ed.) Proceedings of the 2014 Canadian Linguistic Association. St Catharines: Brock University.

[8] Giacalone-Ramat, Anna and Caterina Mauri (2011) The grammaticalization of coordinating interclausal connectives. In: Heine, Bernd and Heiko Narrog (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 656–666.

[9] Haspelmath, Martin (2004) On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In: Fisher, Olga, Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon (eds.) Up and Down the Cline – The Nature of Grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 17–44.

[10] Heine, Bernd and Kyung-An Song (2011) On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 47 (3), 587–630. | DOI 10.1017/S0022226711000016

[11] Himmelmann, Nikolaus (2004) Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In: Walter, Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann and Björn Wiemer (eds.) What Makes Grammaticalization: A Look from its Components and its Fringes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 21–44.

[12] Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott (2003) Grammaticalization, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[13] Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[14] Huddleston, Rodney, John Payne and Peter Peterson (2002) Coordination and supplementation. In: Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1273–1362.

[15] Jucker, Andreas H. (1997) The discourse marker well in the history of English. Language and Linguistics 1 (1), 91–110. | DOI 10.1017/S136067430000037X

[16] Keller, Rudi (1994) On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.

[17] Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak, Agnieszka (2012) Class, age and gender-based patterns. In: Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. and Juan C. Conde-Silvestre (eds.) The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Oxford/ Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 307–331.

[18] Kim, Kyooshiek (2002) The number agreement of the English coordinated subjects. SNU Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics 1, 17–29.

[19] Kohnen, Thomas (2007) 'Connectives profiles' in the history of English texts: Aspects of orality and literacy. In: Lenker, Ursula and Anneli Meurman-Solin (eds.) Connectives in the History of English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 289–308.

[20] Labov, William (1972) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

[21] Labov, William (1994) Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.

[22] Labov, William (2001) Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell.

[23] Langacker, Ronald W. (1977) Syntactic reanalysis. In Li, Charles N. (ed.) Mechanisms of Syntactic Change. Austin: University of Texas Press, 57–139.

[24] Lass, Roger (1997) Historical Linguistic and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[25] Lehmann, Christian (2004) Theory and method in grammaticalization. Zeitschrift für Germanistiche Linguistik 32 (2), 152–187.

[26] Nevalainen, Terttu (2012) Historial Sociolinguistic. In: Bergs, Alexander and Laurel J. Brintol (eds.) English Historical Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook. Vol. 2. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 1438–1456.

[27] Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (1996) Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.

[28] Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (2003) Historical Sociolinguistics. Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Longman and Pearson Education.

[29] Nurmi, Arja (1999) A Social History of Periphrastic 'do'. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.

[30] Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Startvik (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman.

[31] Rissanen, Matti (1999) Syntax. In: Lass, Roger (ed.) The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 187–331.

[32] Ross, John R. (1967) Constraints on variables in syntax (Doctoral dissertation). MIT: Cambridge.

[33] Säily, Tanja (2014) Sociolinguistic Variation in English Derivational Productivity: Studies and Methods in Diachronic Corpus Linguistics. Helsinki: Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique.

[34] Traugott, Elizabeth C. (2010) Grammaticalization. In: Luraghi, Silvia and Vit Bubenik (eds.) Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics. London: Continuum Press, 269–283.

[35] Vázquez, Nila, Laura Esteban-Segura and Teresa Marqués-Aguado (2011) A descriptive approach to computerised English historical corpora in the 21st century. International Journal of English Studies 11 (2), 119–139. | DOI 10.6018/ijes/2011/2/149671