An integrative review of literature on learners in the digital era

Title: An integrative review of literature on learners in the digital era
Source document: Studia paedagogica. 2014, vol. 19, iss. 4, pp. [161]-184
  • ISSN
    1803-7437 (print)
    2336-4521 (online)
Type: Article
License: Not specified license

Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.

The purpose of this paper is to report on the state of knowledge in education related to the concept of the "digital native" and affiliated concepts, as well as on how the literature was identified, analyzed, synthesized, and reported. To address the research aim, an integrative literature review was performed. In all, 355 articles (both qualitative and quantitative) published between 1991 and 2013 were reviewed. On the basis of the findings, the literature review revealed 46 terms related to the notion of this "new generation" of students, some similar, others quite different, and many redundant. The three most common terms in circulation are: digital natives, net generation, and millennials. The author recommends moving beyond the superficial dichotomy of "natives" and "immigrants", focusing on the implications of being a learner in a digital era, and taking into account factors such as age, gender, education, culture, experience, institutional context, learning design, social inclusion and exclusion, subject discipline, and socio-economic background.
[1] Acilar, A. (2011). Exploring the aspects of digital divide in a developing country. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 8(1), 231–244. | DOI 10.28945/1415

[2] Akkerman, S., Admiraal, W., Brekelmans, M., & Oost, H. (2008). Auditing quality of research in social sciences. Quality & Quality, 42(2), 257–274. | DOI 10.1007/s11135-006-9044-4

[3] Bajt, S. K. (2011). Web 2.0 technologies: Applications for community colleges. New Directions for Community Colleges, 11(154), 53–62. | DOI 10.1002/cc.446

[4] Battro, A. M., & Fischer, K. W. (2012). Mind, brain, and education in the digital era. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(1), 49–50.

[5] Bauerlein, M. (2008). The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future (or, don't trust anyone under 30). New York: Tarcher/Penguin Books.

[6] Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the 'digital natives' debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321–331. | DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x

[7] Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. | DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x

[8] Brabazon, T. (2007). The university of Google: Education in the (post) information age. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

[9] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. | DOI 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[10] Brown, C. & Czerniewicz, L. (2008). Trends in student use of ICTs in higher education in South Africa. Available at:

[11] Brown, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Debunking the 'digital natives': Beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 357–369. | DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00369.x

[12] Brown, J. S. (2000). Growing up digital: How the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(2), 11–20. | DOI 10.1080/00091380009601719

[13] Brown, J. S. (2002). Learning in the digital age. In M. Devlin, R. Larson & J. Meyerson (Eds.), The Internet & the University: Forum 2001 (pp. 65–91). Aspen: Forum for the Future of Higher Education and EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from:

[14] Bullen, M., Morgan, T., Belfer, K., & Qayyum, A. (2008). The digital learner at BCIT and implications for an e-strategy. Retrieved from:

[15] Bullen, M., Belfer, K., Morgan, T., & Qayyum, A. (2009). The net generation in higher education: Rhetoric and reality. International Journal of Excellence in E-Learning, 2(1), 1–13.

[16] Bullen, M., & Morgan, T. (2011). Digital learners not digital natives. La Cuestión Universitaria, 1(7), 60–68.

[17] Bullen, M., Morgan, T., & Qayyum, A. (2011). Digital learners in higher education: Generation is not the issue. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37(1), 1–24.

[18] Carlson, S. (2005). The net generation goes to college. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from:

[19] Carstens, A., & Beck, J. (2004). Get ready for the gamer generation. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 49(3), 22–25.

[20] Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge.

[21] Connaway, L. S., White, D., & Lanclos, D. (2011). Visitors and residents: What motivates engagement with the digital information environment? Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1–7. | DOI 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801129

[22] Coomes, M. D., & DeBard, R. (Eds.) (2004). A generational approach to understanding students [Special issue]. New Directions for Student Services, 2004(106), 5–16. | DOI 10.1002/ss.121

[23] Corrin, L., Lockyer, L., & Bennett, S. (2010). Technological diversity: An investigation of students' technology use in everyday life and academic study. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(4), 87–401. | DOI 10.1080/17439884.2010.531024

[24] Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

[25] Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.

[26] Czerniewicz, L., & Brown, C. (2010). Born into the digital age in the south of Africa: The reconfiguration of the "digital citizen". In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010 (pp. 859–865). Aalborg: Aalborg University.

[27] DeBard, R. (2004). Millennials coming to college [Special issue]. New Directions for Student Services, 2004(106), 33–45. | DOI 10.1002/ss.123

[28] Djamasbi, S., Siegel, M., & Tullis, T. (2010). Generation Y, web design, and eye tracking. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(5), 307–323. | DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.12.006

[29] Downing, K. (2006). Next generation: What leaders need to know about the Millennials. Leadership in Action, 26(3), 3–6. | DOI 10.1002/lia.1161

[30] Duncan-Howell, J. & Lee, K.T. (2007). M-learning: Finding a place for mobile technologies within tertiary educational settings. Retrieved from:

[31] Frand, J. L. (2000). The information-age mindset: Changes in students and implications for higher education. EDUCAUSE Review, 35(5), 14–24.

[32] Gardner, H., & Davis, K. (2013). The app generation: How today's youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital World. London: Yale University Press.

[33] Gaston, J. (2006). Reaching and teaching the digital natives. Library Hi Tech News, 23(3), 12–13. | DOI 10.1108/07419050610668124

[34] Green, B., Reid, J. A., & Bigum, C. (1998). Teaching the Nintendo generation? Children, computer culture and popular technologies. In S. Howard (Ed.), Wired up: Young people and the electronic media (pp. 19-41). London: UCL Press.

[35] Gros, B., García, I., & Escofet, A. (2012). Beyond the Net generation debate: A comparison between digital learners in face-to-face and virtual universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 190–210.

[36] Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. (2012). Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

[37] Guzdial, M., & Soloway, E. (2002). Teaching the Nintendo generation to program. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 17–21. | DOI 10.1145/505248.505261

[38] Hamilton, D. W., & Torraco, R. J. (2013). Integrative review of the literature on adults with limited education and skills and the implications for human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 12(3), 308–328. | DOI 10.1177/1534484312471135

[39] Harel, I. (1997). Clickerati kids: Who are they? Retrieved from:

[40] Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. | DOI 10.1080/01411920902989227

[41] Hilbert, M. (2011). Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies, and statistics. Women's Studies International Forum 34(6), 479–489. | DOI 10.1016/j.wsif.2011.07.001

[42] Holloway, S., & Valentine, G. (2001). Cyberkids: Youth identities and communities in an on-line world. London: Routledge.

[43] Holloway, S. L., & Valentine, G. (2003). Cyberkids: Children in the information age. London: Routledge.

[44] Holmes, J. (2011). Cyberkids or divided generations? Characterising young people's internet use in the UK with generic, continuum or typological models. New Media & Society, 13(7), 1104–1122. | DOI 10.1177/1461444810397649

[45] Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (1991). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Original.

[46] Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Original.

[47] Jelfs, A. & Richardson, T., E., R. (2012). The use of digital technologies across the adult life span in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 338–351. | DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01308.x

[48] Jones, C. (2010). A new generation of learners? The net generation and digital natives. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(4), 365–368. | DOI 10.1080/17439884.2010.531278

[49] Jones, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Describing or debunking? The net generation and digital natives. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 317–320. | DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00379.x

[50] Jones, C. & Healing, G. (2010) Net generation students: agency and choice and the new technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26(5), 344–356. | DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00370.x

[51] Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers and Education, 54(3), 722–732. | DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022

[52] Jorgensen, B. (2003). Baby boomers, generation X and generation Y? Policy implications for defence forces in the modern era. Foresight, 5(4), 41–49. | DOI 10.1108/14636680310494753

[53] Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S. J., Maton,... & Churchwood, A. (2007). The Net Generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: preliminary findings. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, S. Soong & C. Cheers (Eds.), Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 517–525). Singapore: Nanyang Technology University.

[54] Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Judd, T., Gray, K., & Chang, R. (2008). Immigrants and natives: Investigating differences between staff and students' use of technology. In R. Atkinson & C. McBeath (Eds.), Proceedings of "Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology?", the Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 484–492). Melbourne: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.

[55] Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Gray, K., Waycott, J., Judd, T., & Chang, R. (2009). Educating the Net generation: A handbook of findings for practice and policy. Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

[56] Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. D. (2008) First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122. | DOI 10.14742/ajet.1233

[57] Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarno, B., & Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and immigrants: Exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 332–343. | DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x

[58] Kitsis, S. M. (2008). The Facebook generation: Homework as social networking. English Journal, 98(2), 30–36.

[59] Koch, T. (2006). Establishing rigour in qualitative research: The decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(1), 91–100. | DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03681.x

[60] Koeller, M. (2012). From baby boomers to generation Y millennials: Ideas on how professors might structure classes for this media conscious generation. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 12(1), 77–82.

[61] Kolikant, Y. B. (2010). Digital natives, better learners? Students' beliefs about how the internet influenced their ability to learn. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1384–1391. | DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.012

[62] Lancaster, L. C., & Stillman, D. (2002). When generations collide: Who they are. Why they clash. How to solve the generational puzzle at work. New York: Collins Business.

[63] Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of instant-message generation and the internet's impact on friendship and family relationships. Washington: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

[64] Levin, D., & Arafeh, S. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet-savvy students and their schools. Washington: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

[65] Li, Y., & Ranieri, M. (2010). Are "digital natives" really digitally competent? A study on Chinese teenagers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 1029–1042. | DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01053.x

[66] Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., & McGill, L. (2012). Learning at the digital frontier: A review of digital literacies in theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 547–556. | DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00474.x

[67] Littlejohn, A., Margaryan, A., & Vojt, G. (2010). Exploring Students' use of ICT and Expectations of Learning Methods. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 8(1), 13–20. Retrieved from:

[68] Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Do web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16-year-old students. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 87–104. | DOI 10.1080/17439880902921949

[69] MacLean, G., & Elwood, J. A. (2009). Digital natives, learner perceptions and the use of ICT. Handbook of research on Web 2.0, 156–179. Hershey: Information Science Reference.

[70] Malhotra, K., Ahouilihoua, N., Eshmambetova, Z., Kirungi, F., Glynn-Broderick, K., Ladd, P., & Palathingal, A. (2008). Making globalization work for the least developed countries. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

[71] Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440. | DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004

[72] Martin, C. A., & Tulgan, B. (2002). Managing the generational mix: From collision to collaboration. Amherst: Human Ressource Development Press.

[73] Martin, C. A., & Tulgan, B. (2006). Managing the generation mix: From urgency to opportunity (2nd ed.). Amherst: Human Ressource Development Press.

[74] McMahon, M., & Pospisil, R. (2005). Laptops for a digital lifestyle: Millennial students and wireless mobile technologies. In H. Goss, (Ed.), Balance Fidelity, Mobility: Maintaining the Momentum? Proceedings of the 22nd ASCILITE Conference (pp. 421–431). Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.

[75] Mendeley (2013). Get Mendeley. Retrieved from

[76] Miah, M., & Omar, A. (2012). Technology advancement in developing countries during digital age. International Journal of Science and Applied Information Technology 1(1), 30–38.

[77] Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

[78] Morgan, T., & Bullen, M. (2013). Crossing boundaries: Exploring social and academic uses of technology in higher education. Paper presented at The International Perspectives on TechnologyEnhanced Learning IPTEL 2013. Vancouver.

[79] Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., & Huntington, P. (2007). Information behaviour of the researcher of the future – Executive summary. London: Joint Information Systems Committee.

[80] Oblinger, D. G., & Hawkins, B. L. (2005). The myths about students. Educause Review, 40(5), 12–13.

[81] Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (Eds.). (2005). Educating the net generation. Washington: EDUCAUSE.

[82] Palfrey, J. G., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.

[83] Palfrey, J., Gasser, U., Simun, M., & Barnes, R. F. (2009). Youth, creativity and copyright in the digital age. International Journal of Learning & Media, 1(2), 79–97. | DOI 10.1162/ijlm.2009.0022

[84] Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.

[85] Pedró, F. (2006). The new millennium learners: Challenging our views on ICT and learning. Retrieved from

[86] Pedró, F. (2009). New millennium learners in higher education: Evidence and policy implications. Paper presented at the International Conference on 21st Century Competencies, Brussels.

[87] Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants, Part I. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. | DOI 10.1108/10748120110424816

[88] Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants, Part II: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–9.

[89] Prensky, M. (2004). The emerging online life of the digital native: What they do differently because of technology, and how they do it. New York: Marc Prensky. Retrieved from

[90] Prensky, M. (2006). Listen to the Natives. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 8–13.

[91] Prensky, M. (2007). How to teach with technology: Keeping both teachers and students comfortable in an era of exponential change. In S. Crowne, Emerging Technologies for Learning (pp. 40–46), Coventry: Becta.

[92] Prensky, M. (2009). H. Sapiens Digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(3). Retrieved from:

[93] Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

[94] Prensky, M. (2011). Digital wisdom and homo sapiens digital. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Deconstructing digital natives: Young people, technology and the new literacies (pp. 15–29). New York: Routledge.

[95] Qayyum, A., Bullen, M., Morgan, T. & Belfer, K. (2008). The digital learner at BCIT: The myth and the reality. Presentation to the Canadian Network for Innovation in Education (CNIE) Conference. Banff.

[96] Rapetti, E. (2011). The knowledge society between "smart devices" and "digital learners": A pedagogical-anthropological reflection about the implications of dominant rhetoric in eLearning field. In L. Cantoni, P. Dillenbourg, & D. Euler (Eds.), Proceedings of the RedConference: Rethinking Education in the Knowledge Society (pp. 236–253). Ascona: Università della Svizzera italiana.

[97] Rapetti, E. (2012). LoDE: Learners of Digital Era (Doctoral dissertation). Università della Svizzera italiana. Retrieved from:

[98] Rapetti, E., & Cantoni, L. (2010a). "Digital natives" and learning with the ICTs: The "GenY@work" research in Ticino, Switzerland. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 6(1), 39–49.

[99] Rapetti, E., & Cantoni, L. (2010b). Exploring the added value of digital technologies and eLearning in higher education from learners' perspective. A research informed by a systematized literature review. In G. L. Chova, D. M. Belenguer, & I. C. Torres, (Eds.), EDULEARN10 Proceedings: 2nd International conference on Education and New Learning Technology (pp. 1403–1412). Barcelona: International Association of Technology, Education and Development.

[100] Rapetti, E., & Cantoni, L. (2012). Reconsidering "Gen Y" & Co: From minding the gap to overcoming it. In M. F. Paulsen & A. Szücs (Eds.), Open Learning Generations: Closing the gap from Generation "Y" to the mature lifelong learners. Eden 2012 International Conference (pp. 19). Porto: European Distance and E-Learning Network.

[101] Rapetti, E., & Cantoni, L. (2013). Learners of digital era between data evidence and intuitions. In D. Parmigian, V. Pennazio, & A. Traverso (Eds.), Learning & Teaching with Media & Technology. Association for Teacher Education in Europe-SiREM. (pp. 148–158). Genoa: Association for Teacher Education in Europe.

[102] Rapetti, E., & Marshall, S. (2010). Observing ICTs in learners' experiences around the world. QWERTY – Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 5(2), 61–88.

[103] Rideout, V., Foehr, U., & Roberts, D. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8 to 18 year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.

[104] Roberts, D., Foehr, U., & Rideout, V. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8 to 18 year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.

[105] Rocco, T. S., & Plakhotnik, M. S. (2009). Literature reviews, conceptual frameworks, and theoretical frameworks: Terms, functions, and distinctions. Human Resource Development Review, 8(1), 120–130. | DOI 10.1177/1534484309332617

[106] Romero, M., Guitert, M., Sangrà, A., & Bullen, M. (2012). Digital learners at the Open University of Catalonia: A skeptical view of the phenomenon of the net generation. In I. Roceanu, (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference: eLearning and Software for Education (pp. 294–299). Bucharest: Editura Universitara.

[107] Romero, M., Guitert, M., Sangrà, A., & Bullen, M. (2013). Do UOC students fit in the net generation profile? An approach to their habits in ICT use. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 158–181.

[108] Rosen, L. D. (2007). Me, MySpace and I: Parenting the Net Generation. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

[109] Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2010). Rewired: Understanding the I-Generation and the way they learn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

[110] Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Huntington, P., Fieldhouse, M., Gunter, B., & Tenopir, C. (2008). The Google generation: The information behaviour of the researcher of the future. Aslib Proceedings 60(4), 290–310. | DOI 10.1108/00012530810887953

[111] Rushkoff, D. (2006). ScreenAgers: Lessons in chaos from digital kids. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

[112] Russell, C. L. (2005). An overview of the integrative research review. Progress in transplantation, 15(1), 8–13. | DOI 10.7182/prtr.15.1.0n13660r26g725kj

[113] Salajan, F. D., Schönwetter, D. J., & Cleghorn, B. M. (2010). Student and faculty intergenerational digital divide: Fact or fiction? Computers & Education, 55(3), 1393–1403. | DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.017

[114] Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

[115] Sharpe, R. (2010). Conceptualizing differences in learners' experiences of e-learning: A review of contextual models (HEALD Report). Retrieved from:

[116] Simoneaux, S., & Stroud, C. (2010). Bridging the generation gaps in the retirement services workplace. Journal of Pension Benefits: Issues in Administration, 17(2), 66–75.

[117] Skiba, D. J. (2010). Digital wisdom: A necessary faculty competency? Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(4), 251–253.

[118] Smith, E. E. (2012). The digital native debate in higher education: A comparative analysis of recent literature. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La Revue Canadienne de L'apprentissage et de La Technologie, 38(3), 1–18.

[119] Soloway, E. (1991). How the Nintendo generation learns. Communications of the ACM, 34(9), 23–26. | DOI 10.1145/114669.114717

[120] Stoerger, S. (2009). The digital melting pot: Bridging the digital native-immigrant divide. First Monday, 14(7). Retrieved from: | DOI 10.5210/fm.v14i7.2474

[121] Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw Hill.

[122] Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw Hill.

[123] Taylor, P., & Keeter, S. (Eds.) (2010). Millennials: A portrait of generation next. Confident. Connected. Open to change. Washington: Pew Research Center.

[124] Thinyane, H. (2010). Are digital natives a world-wide phenomenon? An investigation into South African first year students' use and experience with technology. Computers & Education, 55(1), 406–414. | DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.005

[125] Thirunarayanan, M. O., Lezcano, H., McKee, M., & Roque, G. (2011). "Digital nerds" and "digital normal": Not "digital natives" and "digital immigrants". International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 8(2), 25–33.

[126] Thomas, M. (2011). Deconstructing digital natives: Young people, technology, and the new literacies. New York: Routledge.

[127] Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65(1), 12–33. | DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022

[128] Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. | DOI 10.1177/1534484305278283

[129] Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation me: Why today's young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled – and more miserable than ever before. New York: Free Press.

[130] Twenge, J. M. (2009). Generational changes and their impact in the classroom: Teaching Generation Me. Medical Education, 43(5), 398–405. | DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03310.x

[131] Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. | DOI 10.1111/nhs.12048

[132] Valentine, G., & Holloway, S. L. (2010). Cyberkids? Exploring children's identities and social networks in on-line and off-line worlds. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(2), 302–319. | DOI 10.1111/1467-8306.00292

[133] Veen, W. (2007). Homo Zappiens and the need for new education systems. Paper presented at OECD seminar on Digital Natives and Education. Retrieved from

[134] Veen, W. & Vrakking, B. (2006). Homo Zappiens, growing up in a digital age. London: Network Continuum Education.

[135] Virkus, S. (2008). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in LIS education: Experiences at Tallinn University, Estonia. Program: Electronic library and information systems, 42(3), 262–274.

[136] Weiler, A. (2005). Information-seeking behavior in generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(1), 46–53. | DOI 10.1016/j.acalib.2004.09.009

[137] Weinberger, D. (2007). Digital natives, immigrants and others. KMWorld, 17(1). Retrieved from

[138] White, D., & Le Cornu, A. (2011). Visitors and residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday: Peer-Reviewed Journal on the Internet, 16(9). Retrieved from | DOI 10.5210/fm.v16i9.3171

[139] Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. | DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

[140] Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (2000). Generations at work: Managing the clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in your workplace. New York: AMACOM.