"There is sex in mind" : scientific determinism and the woman question in Lady Audley's Secret

Source document: Brno studies in English. 2012, vol. 38, iss. 1, pp. [87]-102
Extent
[87]-102
  • ISSN
    0524-6881 (print)
    1805-0867 (online)
Type
Article
Language
English
License: Not specified license
Abstract(s)
My contention in this paper is that in Lady Audley's Secret Elizabeth Braddon is critical of the nineteenth-century theories of cerebral and biological determinism in relation to the question of female madness. I argue in the first part that Braddon pinpoints phrenology – the study of the faculties of the mind from the conformation of the skull – as one of the institutionalized sciences that provided a materialistic underpinning and a further incentive to masculine hegemony. After I outline the basic tenets of the theory I shall argue that as a subject of phrenological analysis, the madwoman is treated in ways that reproduce Victorian gender-normative stereotypes. In the second part I shall demonstrate that marriage is denounced as an institution that bolsters the hegemonic machine.
Document
References:
[1] Braddon Elizabeth (1998) Lady Audley's Secret . Ed. David Skilton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[2] Chesler, Phyllis (2005) Women and Madness . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

[3] Combe, George (1819) Essays on Phrenology; or an Inquiry into the Principles and Ability of the System of Drs Gall and Spurzheim; and into the Objections Made Against It . Edinburgh.

[4] Combe, George (nd) 1819-1920 Notebooks . NLS7406, fo. 72–73.

[5] Combe, George (1974) The Constitution of Man in Relation to External Objects . Delmar: Scholars' Facsimiles & Reprints.

[6] Cooter, Roger (1976) ' Phrenology and British Alienists, c. 1825-1845 '. Medical History 20, 1–21.

[7] Cooter, Roger (1984) The Cultural Meaning of Popular Science: Phrenology and the Organization of Consent in Nineteenth-Century Britain . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[8] Daston, Lorraine (1996) ' The Naturalized Female Intellect '. In: Grauman, Carl F. and Kenneth J. Gergen (eds.) Historical Dimensions of Psychological Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press, 165–192.

[9] De Giustino, David (1975) Conquest of Mind: Phrenology and Victorian Social Thought . London: Totowa.

[10] Leahey, Thomas Hardy and Grace Evans Leahey (1983) Psychology's Occult Doubles: Psychology and the Problem of Pseudoscience . Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

[11] Loesberg, Jonathan (1986) ' The Ideology of Narrative Form in the Sensation Fiction '. Representations 13, 115–138. | DOI 10.1525/rep.1986.13.1.99p01136

[12] Lukasik, Christopher J (2011) Discerning Characters: The Culture of Appearance in Early America . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

[13] Maudsley, Henry (1873) Body and Mind: An Inquiry into Their Connection and Mutual Influence, Especially in Reference to Mental Disorders . London: Macmillan.

[14] Maudsley, Henry (1867) The Physiology and Pathology of the Mind . New York: Appleton & Company.

[15] Punter, David (1998) Gothic Pathologies: the Text, the Body, and the Law . New York: St. Martin's Press.

[16] Richards, Robert John (1987) Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[17] Schroeder, Natalie and Ronald A. Schroeder (2006) From Sensation to Society: Representations of Marriage in the Fiction of Mary Elizabeth Braddon 1862-1866 . Rosemont Publishing.

[18] Showalter, Elaine (1987) The Female Malady: Women, Madness, and English Culture, 1830-1980 . New York: Virago.

[19] Smart Alexander (1834) ' On the Application of phrenology in the formation of marriages .' The American Phrenological Journal and Miscellany. Vol II. Philadelphia: Haswell, Barrington & Co.

[20] Spurzheim, Johann C (1825) A View of the Philosophical Principles of Phrenology . London: Knight.

[21] Spurzheim, Johann C (1829) Outlines of Phrenology; Being also a Manual of Reference for the Marked Busts . London: Treuttel, Wurtz, and Richter.

[22] Voskuil, Lynn M (2001) ' Acts of Madness: Lady Audley and the Meaning of Victorian Femininity '. Feminist Studies 27, 611–639. | DOI 10.2307/3178808