Czech left periphery: a preliminary analysis

Variant title
Levá periferie v češtině: předběžná analýza
Author: Kašpar, Jiří
Source document: Linguistica Brunensia. 2016, vol. 64, iss. 1, pp. 71-88
Extent
71-88
  • ISSN
    1803-7410 (print)
    2336-4440 (online)
Type
Article
Language
English
License: Not specified license
Abstract(s)
The consensus in the more recent literature on the Czech left periphery is that postulating only one functional projection above the highest head of the I-domain is not sufficient to account for certain data. The available analyses differ in detail, but most of them assume that particles such as že ('that') and aby ('for') are complementisers that are located in the highest head of the C-domain. Another assumption that is often made is that clitics such as se ('oneself') appear in either the highest head of the I-domain or the lowest head of the C-domain. Under certain unspecified conditions, clitics can optionally move to some higher functional head. In the account of the Czech left periphery proposed below, the positional (in)flexibility of complementisers and clitics is reversed. More concretely, the twofold claim advocated below is that clitics appear in I, and that complementisers might appear in either C or I. It follows that že and aby should not always be labeled 'complementisers'. While the above assumptions account for most of the attested distributional patterns, it is necessary to further assume that že, but not aby, might lexicalise a functional head immediately above CP. This is necessary to explain why contrastive left dislocation can take place below že, but not aby. The fully articulated structure of the Czech left periphery is taken to be the following: [CP2 [C2 {že/*aby/Ø} ] [CP1 XP [CP1 [C1 {že/?(?)aby/Ø} ] [IP XP [IP [I {že/aby/Ø}+CL ] [vP … XP … ]]]]]]. (The curly brackets denote a set of mutually exclusive alternatives; the XP marks a possible landing site for X-bar movement.)
Note
  • The research reported in this paper was carried out at University College London and was sponsored by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (UK).
Document
References:
[1] De Haan, Germen – Weerman, Fred. 1985. Finiteness and verb fronting in Frisian . In: Haider, Hubert – Prinzhorn, Martin, eds. Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 77–110.

[2] Dotlačil, Jakub. 2004. The syntax of infinitives in Czech . Master’s thesis. CASTL, University of Tromsø.

[3] Dotlačil, Jakub. 2007. Why clitics cannot climb out of CP: A discourse approach . Ms.

[4] Iatridou, Sabine – Kroch, Anthony. 1992. The licensing of CP-recursion and its relevance to the Germanic verb-second phenomenon . In: Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax. 50, pp. 1–24.

[5] Kaspar, Jiri. to appear. Topicalisation in coordination under subordination . In: The Proceedings of the FASL 24.

[6] Lenertová, Denisa. 2001. On clitic placement, topicalization and CP-structure in Czech . In: Zybatov, Gerhild et al., eds. Current Issues in Formal Slavic Linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 294–305.

[7] McCloskey, James. 2006. Questions and questioning in a local English . In: Zanuttini, Raffaella et al., eds. Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense, and Clausal Architecture. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, pp. 87–126.

[8] Meyer, Roland. 2007. O pozici podřadících spojek v ČNK . In: Štícha, František – Šimandl, Josef, eds. Gramatika a Korpus. Praha: ÚJČ AV ČR, pp. 170–178.

[9] Meyer, Roland. 2010. Mood in Czech and Slovak . In: Rothstein, Björn – Thieroff, Rolf, eds. Mood in the Languages of Europe. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 358–375.

[10] Munn, Alan Boag. 1993. Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures . Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland.

[11] Sturgeon, Anne. 2008. The Left Periphery: The Interaction of Syntax, Pragmatics and Prosody in Czech . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

[12] Veselá, Kateřina – Peterek, Nino – Hajičová, Eva. 2003. Topic-focus articulation in PDT: Prosodic characteristics of contrastive topic . The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, pp. 79–80.

[13] Veselovská, Ludmila. 1995. Phrasal movement and X-morphology: word order parallels in Czech and English nominal and verbal projections . Ph.D. thesis. Palacký University in Olomouc.

[14] Wurmbrand, Susi. 2015. Cross-linguistic investigation of restructuring and finiteness: implications for clausal domains and locality . Lecture series at the Eastern Generative Grammar Summer School (EGG 22), Brno.