Paragraphs in classical Latin texts : problems with editing and the internal evidence from texts

Author: Ctibor, Michal
Source document: Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2017, vol. 22, iss. 1, pp. 17-29
Extent
17-29
  • ISSN
    1803-7402 (print)
    2336-4424 (online)
Type
Article
Language
English
Latin
License: Not specified license
Abstract(s)
The present article deals with the question of paragraphs in classical Latin texts. In the first half, it presents and illustrates two major problems that can arise from an editor's careless division of a text into paragraphs (i.e. change in reference of anaphoric pronouns; misleading text segmentation). In the second half, the article claims and tries to prove (largely on the basis of the inner characteristics of texts) that ancient authors (or at least auctor ad Herennium, Cicero, Sallust, and Suetonius) structured their texts into paragraphs, though they used various other means than indentation to signal it to the reader.
Note
  • This study was supported by the Charles University project Progres 4, Language in the shiftings of time, space, and culture.
Document
References:
[1] Carter, J. M. (Ed.). (1982). Suetonius: Divus Augustus . Bristol: Bristol Classical Press. All the other texts and translations are taken from the Loeb Classical Library.

[2] Blommaert, J. (2009). Discourse. A Critical Introduction (5th print.) . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[3] Ctibor, M. (in print). Pragmatic Functions of the Latin Vocative .

[4] Daneš, F. (1968). Typy tematických posloupností v textu (na materiále českého textu odborného) [Types of 'Thematic Progression' in Text (Based on an Analysis of Czech Technical Texts)]. Slovo a slovesnost, 29, 125–141.

[5] Daneš, F. (1994). Odstavec jako centrální jednotka tematicko-kompoziční výstavby textu (na materiále textů výkladových) [The Paragraph – a Central Unit of the Thematic and Compositional Build-up of Expository Discourses]. Slovo a slovesnost, 55, 1–17.

[6] Hoffmann, R. (2010). Latin Word Order Revisited: Information Structure of Topic and Focus . In P. Anreiter, & M. Kienpointner (Eds.), Latin Linguistics Today. Akten des 15. Internationalen Kolloquiums zur Lateinischen Linguistik, Innsbruck 4–9 April 2009 (pp. 267–280). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck.

[7] Kroon, C. (1995). Discourse particles in Latin. A study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at . Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.

[8] Kroon, C. (2011). Latin Particles and the Grammar of Discourse . In J. Clackson (Ed.), A Companion to the Latin Language (pp. 176–195). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

[9] Kroon, C. (2014). Causality, Coherence and Latin 'Connectives': A Discourse Pragmatic Approach . In A. Morel-Alizon, & J.-F. Thomas (Eds.), La causalité en Latin (pp. 67–85). Paris: L'Harmattan.

[10] Oakley, S. P. (2009). Style and Language . In A. J. Woodman (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus (pp. 195–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[11] Spevak, O. (2010). Constituent Order in Classical Latin Prose . Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

[12] Wingo, E. O. (1972). Latin Punctuation in the Classical Age . The Hague – Paris: Mouton.