The <o/u> graphemic oscillation in Latin epigraphy : some preliminary sociolinguistic remarks

Source document: Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2017, vol. 22, iss. 2, pp. 255-267
Extent
255-267
  • ISSN
    1803-7402 (print)
    2336-4424 (online)
Type
Article
Language
English
License: Not specified license
Abstract(s)
This paper deals with some particularly interesting o-spellings attested in Latin inscriptions dating back to the late Republican age (and to the first Imperial period) and attempts to determine whether they may provide some evidence of an anticipation of the (Proto) Romance merger of the Classical Latin back-vowels /oː/ and /u/ as a close /o/. All the inscriptions have been analysed in detail by taking into account the dating, geographical origin and typology of the single epigraph, while particular attention has been paid to the possible presence (or absence) of other deviant spellings within the same texts. The results suggest that the phenomenon investigated here might actually date back to the late Republican age, at least within some substandard varieties of the language.
Document
References:
[1] Adams, J. N. (2013). Social Variation and the Latin Language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[2] Allen, W. S. (1978). Vox Latina . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[3] Benedetti, M. (1996). Dittonghi e geminazione consonantica in latino: un caso di «deriva» . Studi e Saggi Linguistici, 36, 11–93.

[4] Campanile, E. (1971). Due studi sul latino volgare . L'Italia Dialettale, 34, 1–64.

[5] Cipriano, P. (1985). La scrittura dei fonemi di timbro [i] secondo Nigidio Figulo e Varrone . Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 70, 38–50.

[6] Coleman, R. (1971). The monophthongization of /ae/ and the Vulgar Latin vowel system . Transactions of the Philological Society, 70, 175–191. | DOI 10.1111/j.1467-968X.1971.tb01143.x

[7] Coleman, R. (1990). Dialectal variation in republican Latin, with special reference to Praenestine . Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 36, 1–25. | DOI 10.1017/S0068673500005204

[8] De Vaan, M. (2008). Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages . Leiden – Boston: Brill.

[9] Di Fazio, M. (2012). I luoghi di culto di Feronia. Ubicazioni e funzioni . In G. M. Della Fina (Ed.), Annali della Fondazione per il Museo "C. Faina" (Vol. 19; pp. 379–408). Roma: Quasar.

[10] Frascati, S. (1997). La collezione epigrafica di Giovanni Battista De Rossi presso il Pontificio Istituto di Archeologia Cristiana . Città del Vaticano: PIAC.

[11] Giacomini, P. (1976). Le raccolte di iscrizioni aliene a Bologna. Le collezioni Bevilacqua, Galvani, Palagi, Trombelli del Museo Civico Archeologico . Atti e memorie (Romagna), 27, 61–89.

[12] Gregori, G. L. (1987–1988). Horti sepulchrales e cepotaphia nelle iscrizioni urbane . Bullettino della Commissione Archeologica Comunale di Roma, 92, 175–188.

[13] Herman, J. (1990 [1968]). Statistique et diachronie. Essai sur l'évolution du vocalisme dans la latinité tardive . In J. Herman, & S. Kiss (Eds.), Du latin aux langues romanes: études de linguistique historique (pp. 196–203). Tübingen: Niemeyer.

[14] Herman, J. (1990 [1971]). Essai sur la latinité du littoral adriatique à l'époque de l'empire . In J. Herman, & S. Kiss (Eds.), Du latin aux langues romanes: études de linguistique historique (pp. 121–146). Tübingen: Niemeyer.

[15] Herman, J. (1990 [1985]). La différenciation territoriale du latin et la formation des langues romanes . In J. Herman, & S. Kiss (Eds.), Du latin aux langues romanes: études de linguistique historique (pp. 62–92). Tübingen: Niemeyer.

[16] Leumann, M. (1977). Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre (5th ed.). München: Beck.

[17] Loporcaro, M. (2011a). Syllable, segment and prosody . In M. Maiden, J. C. Smith, & A. Ledgeway (Eds.), The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages (Vol. 1; pp. 50–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[18] Loporcaro, M. (2011b). Phonological processes . In M. Maiden, J. C. Smith, & A. Ledgeway (Eds.), The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages (Vol. 1; pp. 109–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[19] Loporcaro, M. (2015). Vowel Length from Latin to Romance . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[20] Marotta, G. (2015). Talking Stones. Phonology in Latin Inscriptions? Studi e Saggi Linguistici, 53(2), 39–63.

[21] Meiser, G. (2006). Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache (2nd ed). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

[22] Palmer, L. R. (1977). La lingua latina (It. transl. by R. Wright). Torino: Einaudi.

[23] Perrot, J. (1961). Les dérivés latins en -men et -mentum . Paris: Klincksieck.

[24] Pisani, V. (1975). Testi latini arcaici e volgari con commento glottologico (3rd ed.). Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.

[25] Porzig, W. (1924). Bedeutungsgeschichtliche Studien . Indogermanische Forschungen, 42(1), 221–274. | DOI 10.1515/if-1924-0118

[26] Sanders, G. (1985). Une jeune dame de Mevaniola ou la poésie aux coins perdus de l'empire . In G. Susini (Ed.), Cultura epigrafica dell’Appennino. Sarsina, Mevaniola e altri studi (pp. 15–70). Faenza: Fratelli Lega.

[27] Straka, G. (1959). Durée et timbre vocaliques: observations de phonétique générale appliquées à la phonétique historique des langues romanes . Zeitschrift für Phonetik und allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, 12, 276–300.

[28] Sturtevant, E. H. (1968). The pronunciation of Greek and Latin (2nd ed.). Groningen: Bouma’s Boekhuis.

[29] Väänänen, V. (1966). Le latin vulgaire des inscriptions pompéiennes (3rd ed.). Berlin: Akademie.

[30] Väänänen, V. (1981). Introduction au latin vulgaire (3rd ed.). Paris: Klincksieck.

[31] Vallarino, G. (2007). Novità epigrafiche da Trebula Mutuesca. Quattro testi inediti e una revisione di CIL, I2 1834 . Epigraphica, 69, 357–375.

[32] Wachter, R. (1987). Altlateinische Inschriften: sprachliche und epigraphische Untersuchungen zu den Dokumenten bis etwa 150 v. Chr. Bern: Lang.

[33] Weiss, M. (2009). Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin . Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.