Article
| Title: | Overt and covert subjects in Hungarian infinitival clauses and their implications for restructuring |
| Author: | |
| Source document: | Linguistica Brunensia. 2017, vol. 65, iss. 2, pp. 35-52 |
| Extent: | 35-52 |
| ISSN: | 1803-7410 (print); 2336-4440 (online) |
| Type: | Article (English) |
| Stable URL: | http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/137680 |
PDF
Abstract(s):
Focusing on parallels in Hungarian infinitival clauses with subjects in nominative and dative case, the paper argues for a scope-based account of infinitives with nominative subjects complementing earlier proposals in terms of either long-distance agreement or a movement approach to control. One aim of the present paper is comparing the predictions of these two approaches in light of this more extended set of data. The empirical facts also indicate that with a systematic distinction of relationships between heads and phrases the different interpretations of the constructions in question can be explained. The resulting account makes the Hungarian restructuring data more compatible with cross-linguistic accounts of restructuring.
Keywords:
backward control; restructuring; infinitives with nominative subjects; Hungarian
Note:
The research was supported by the OTKA NF84217 grant.
References:
[1] Barbosa, Pilar. forth. Controlled Overt Pronouns as Specificational Predicates. In: Santos, Ana Lúcia – Gonçalves, Anabela, eds. Complement Clauses in Portuguese: Syntax and Acquisition. Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[2] Bartos, Huba. 2006. És mégis mozog? In: Kálmán, László, ed. KB 120 A titkos kötet. Nyelvészeti tanulmányok Bánréti Zoltán és Komlósy András tiszteletére. Budapest: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet, Tinta Könyvkiadó, pp. 49–67.
[3] Belletti, Adriana. 2005. Extended Doubling and the VP Periphery. Probus 17, pp. 1–35. | DOI 10.1515/prbs.2005.17.1.1
[4] Boeckx, Cedric – Hornstein, Norbert – Nunes, Jairo. 2010. Control as Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[5] Dalmi, Gréte. 2005. The Role of Agreement in Non-finite Predication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[6] Davies, William – Dubinsky, Stanley. 2007. New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising. Dordrecht: Springer.
[7] Den Dikken, Marcel. to appear. Dependency and Directionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[8] Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2006. Scrambling, Remnant Movement, and Restructuring in West Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[9] Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 30(1), pp. 69–96. | DOI 10.1162/002438999553968
[10] Komlósy, András. 1992. Régensek és vonzatok. In: Kiefer, Ferenc, ed. Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 1. Mondattan. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, pp. 299–528.
[11] Koopman, Hilda – Szabolcsi, Anna. 1999. Hungarian Complex Verbs and XP-Movement. In: Kenesei, István, ed. Crossing Boundaries. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 115–134.
[12] Landau, Idan. 2004. The Scale of Finiteness and the Calculus of Control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22(4), pp. 811–877. | DOI 10.1007/s11049-004-4265-5
[13] Landau, Idan. 2013. Control in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[14] Landau, Idan. 2015. A Two-Tiered Theory of Control. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
[15] Rackowski, Andrea – Richards, Norvin. 2005. Phase Edge and Extraction: A Tagalog Case Study. Linguistic Inquiry 36(4), pp. 565–599. | DOI 10.1162/002438905774464368
[16] Szabolcsi, Anna. 2005. Overt Infinitival Subjects (If That's What They Are). In Broekhuis et al., eds. Organizing Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 618–625.
[17] Szabolcsi, Anna. 2007. Hidden In Plain Sight: Overt Subjects in Infinitival Control and Raising Complements [online]. [retrieved. 05.12.2016]. Available at: http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000445.
[18] Szabolcsi, Anna. 2009a. Overt Nominative Subjects in Infinitival Complements in Hungarian. In: Den Dikken, Marcel – Vago, Robert M., eds. Approaches to Hungarian 11. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, pp. 251–276.
[19] Szabolcsi, Anna. 2009b. Overt Nominative Subjects in Infinitival Complements: Data, Diagnostics, and Preliminary Analyses. In: Irwin, Patricia – Maldonado, Violeta Vasquéz Rojas, eds. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 2: Papers in Syntax. New York: New York University, pp. 1–55.
[20] Szécsényi, Krisztina. 2009a. On the Double Nature of Hungarian Infinitival Constructions. Lingua 119(4), pp. 592–624. | DOI 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.11.005
[21] Szécsényi, Krisztina. 2009b. An LF-driven Theory of Scrambling in Hungarian Infinitival Constructions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Szeged.
[22] Szécsényi, Krisztina. 2017. Nominative Subjects in Infinitives: Only Pronouns? Talk presented at the Debrecen Workshop on Pronouns, Hungary, February 2017.
[23] Szécsényi, Krisztina – Szécsényi, Tibor. 2016. Definiteness Agreement in Hungarian Multiple Infinitival Constructions. Talk presented at the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2016, Olomouc, June 2016.
[24] Tóth, Ildikó. 2000. Inflected Infinitives in Hungarian. Ph.D. thesis, Tilburg University.
[25] Wurmbrand, Susanne. 2001. Infinitives. Restructuring and Clause Structure. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
[26] Wurmbrand, Susanne. 2014. Restructuring Across the World. In: Veselovská, Ludmila – Janebová, Markéta eds. Complex Visibles Out There. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2014: Language Use and Linguistic Structure. Olomouc: UP, pp. 275–294.
[27] Wurmbrand, Susi. 2015. Restructuring Cross-Linguistically. In: Bui, Thuy – Özyıldız, Deniz, eds. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting 45. Amherst: GLSA, pp. 227–240.
