Andreas Jaszlinsky versus Aristotle : the interface of facts and logic: reflections on the Origin of Life in the work of the Trnava Jesuit in the 18th century

Title: Andreas Jaszlinsky versus Aristotle : the interface of facts and logic: reflections on the Origin of Life in the work of the Trnava Jesuit in the 18th century
Source document: Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2021, vol. 26, iss. 2, pp. 55-65
Extent
55-65
  • ISSN
    1803-7402 (print)
    2336-4424 (online)
Type: Article
Language
 

Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.

Abstract(s)
Reflections on the Origin of Life, by Andreas Jaszlinsky, represents a remarkable symbiosis of the empirical knowledge of the period and the rational education provided to Jesuits in the mid-18th century. In this study we attempt to offer a context for the consideration of ovism and preformationism, primarily based on Aristotle and the scientific research of one of the leading philosophers of the Jesuit Universitatis Tyrnaviensis. Andreas Jaszlinsky, a University Professor and Jesuit, deals with this topic in his work Institutiones physicae. Physica generalis (1761). This text, only fragments of which have been translated into Slovak, is an important document about the state of knowledge of the period but also about the need for intellectuals to think scientific theories (in this case, materialism) through to their consequences and take a position in regard to them.
Note
The article is a partial output of the grant VEGA 1/0749/20. This paper is a supplemented and revised version of the paper: Andrej Jaslinský a jeho Základy fyziky (Andrej Jaszlinsky and His Fundamentals of Physics) that was published in Slovak as part of: Antológia z diel profesorov pôsobiacich na Trnavskej univerzite (1635–1777) (Anthology of the Works of Professors Working at the Universitas Tyrnaviensis, 1635–1777, Trnava: Trnava University 2016).
References
[1] Blair, A. (2008). Natural Philosophy. In K. Park, & L. Datson (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, 3: Early Modern Science. Cambridge: University Press.

[2] Bonnet, Ch. (1672). Contemplation de la Nature. Amsterdam: Marc-Michel Ray.

[3] Blum, P. R. (2012). Studies of Early Modern Aristotelianism. Leiden ‒ Boston: Brill.

[4] Buffon, G. (1766). Histoire Naturelle, générale et particulière, avec la description du Cabinet du Roi, Tome Quatorzième. Paris: Imprimerie royale.

[5] Démuth, A., & Juríková, E. (2016). Andrej Jaslinský a jeho Základy fyziky. In K. Karabová (Ed.), Antológia z diel profesorov pôsobiacich na Trnavskej univerzite (1635–1777) (pp. 63–94). Trnava: Trnavská univerzita.

[6] Hartsoecker, N. (1694). Essai de dioptrique. Paris.

[7] Harvey, W. (1651). Anatomical exercitations concerning the generation of living creatures to which are added particular discourses of births and of conceptions. London: apud James Young.

[8] Hološová, A., & Žažová, H. (2013). History of the Observatory at the University of Trnava 1756 – 1785. Trnava: Trnavská univerzita.

[9] Jaszlinsky, A. (1761). Institutionum physicae pars altera seu physica particularis in usum discipulorum concinnata. Tyrnaviae: Typis academicis Societatis Jesu.

[10] Kopecký, Š. (2014). The Faculty of Medicine 1769–1777. In J. Šimončič, & A. Hološová (Eds.), The History of Trnava University 1635–1777 / 1992–2012 (pp. 269–277). Trnava: Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis.

[11] Lawrence, C. R. (2009). Charles Bonnet (1720–1793). Embryo Project Encyclopedia [retrieved 24.09.2021 from http://embryo.asu.edu/handle/10776/1745].

[12] Leeuwenhoek, A. (1677). De Natis e semine genital Animaculis. Letter to the Royal Society. In Philosophical Transactions, p. 1040–1042.

[13] Leibniz, W. G. (1720). Lehr-Sätze über die Monadologie, ingleichen von Gott und seiner Existentz, seinen Eigenschafften und von der Seele des Menschen etc. wie auch Dessen letzte Vertheidigung seines Systematis Harmoniae praestabilitae wider die Einwürffe des Herrn Bayle. Frankfurt – Leipzig – Jena: Meyers sel. Witwe Buchhandlung.

[14] Lennox, J. (2014). Aristotle's Biology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring Edition [retrieved 24.09.2021 from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/aristotle-biology].

[15] Livio, M. (2014). Brilliant Blunders: From Darwin to Einstein – Colossal Mistakes by Great Scientists That Changed Our Understanding of Life and the Universe [Czech translation: Kadlecová, E. Geniální omyly]. Brno: CPress.

[16] Malebranche, N. (1958–). Oeuvres completes (ed. A. Robinet; Vol. 12: p. 264). Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.

[17] Malpighi, M. (1686). De formation pulli in ovo. In Opera Omnia. London: apud Robertum Scott.

[18] McClellan III, J. (2003). Scientific Institutions and the Organization of Science. In R. Porter (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Science, 4: Eighteenth-Century Science (pp. 87–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[19] Needham, J. T. (1749). Observations upon the Generation, Composition, and Decomposition of Animal and Vegetable Substances. London : [s.n.]

[20] Needham, J. (1959). A History of Embryology. New York: Abelard-Schuman.

[21] Pivovarčiová, L., & Schwarc, E. (2014). The University Pharmacy. In J. Šimončič, & A. Hološová (Eds.), The History of Trnava University 1635–1777 / 1992–2012 (pp. 269–277). Trnava: Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis.

[22] Rádl, E. (2006). Dějiny biologických teorií novověku (Vol. II). Praha: Academia.

[23] Roe, S. A. (2003). The Live Sciences. In R. Porter (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Science, 4: Eighteenth-Century Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[24] Swammerdam, J. (1672). Miraculum naturæ, sive, Uteri muliebris fabrica. Lugduni Batavorum [Leiden]: apud Severinum Matthæi. Zborovjan, M. (2014). The Botanical Garden of the Faculty of Medicine 1771–1777. In J. Šimončič, & A. Hološová (Eds.), The History of Trnava University 1635–1777 / 1992–2012 (pp. 279–285). Trnava: Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis.