Limity postkoloniální kritiky pojmu náboženství v díle S.N. Balagangadhary

Title: Limity postkoloniální kritiky pojmu náboženství v díle S.N. Balagangadhary
Source document: Sacra. 2010, vol. 8, iss. 2, pp. 61-65
  • ISSN
    1214-5351 (print)
    2336-4483 (online)
Type: Article
License: Not specified license

Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.

[1] Asad, T. 1993. "The construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category". In: idem, Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

[2] Asad, T. 2003. "What Might the Antropology of the Secular Look Like". In: idem, Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

[3] Balagangadhara, S. N. 2005. Heathen in His Blindness: Asia, The West and The Dynamic of Religion. New Delhi: Manohar.

[4] Fitzgerald, T. 1990. "Hinduism and the 'World Religion' Fallacy". Religion 20/2, 101–118. | DOI 10.1016/0048-721X(90)90099-R

[5] Fitzgerald, T. 1997. "A critique of 'religion' as a cross-cultural category". Methodand Theoryin the Study of Religion 9/2, 91–110. | DOI 10.1163/157006897X00070

[6] Foucault, M. 2000. "Těla odsouzených". In: idem, Dohlížet a trestat: kniha o zrodu vězení. Praha: Dauphin, 33–66.

[7] Masuzawa, T. 2005. The Invention of World Religions: Or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.

[8] McCutcheon, R. 2003. Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Genesis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. New York: Oxford University Press.

[9] Said, E. W. 2008. Orientalismus: Západní koncepce Orientu. Praha: Paseka.

[10] Smith, J. Z. 1998. "Fences and Neighbours: Some Contours of Early Judaism". In: idem, Imagining Religion. From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1–18