Search
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12
Chapter
Porter, Robert.
Aspects of alienation in Russian and other literature: borders and islands. In: Dialogy o slovanských literaturách : tradice a perspektivy.
2012, pp. 161–167.
Chapter
Juvan, Marko.
The space of Slovenian literary culture: framework and goals of a research project. In: Dialogy o slovanských literaturách : tradice a perspektivy.
2012, pp. 115–118.
Chapter
Bunjak, Petar, Topić, Miroslav.
Attributes of wine in Serbian decasyllabic folk poems. In: Dialogy o slovanských literaturách : tradice a perspektivy.
2012, pp. 47–53.
Book
Křístek, Michal.
A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses). 2012
Chapter
Křístek, Michal.
Acknowledgements. In: Křístek, Michal. A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses).
2012, pp. 5.
Chapter
Křístek, Michal.
Introduction. In: Křístek, Michal. A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses).
2012, pp. 9–10.
Chapter
Křístek, Michal.
Bibliography. In: Křístek, Michal. A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses).
2012, pp. 104–108.
Chapter
Křístek, Michal.
Czech theories of style. In: Křístek, Michal. A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses).
2012, pp. 11–45.
Chapter
Křístek, Michal.
Comparison of Czech and British theories of style. In: Křístek, Michal. A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses).
2012, pp. 66–94.
Chapter
Křístek, Michal.
Conclusions and possibilities for further research. In: Křístek, Michal. A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses).
2012, pp. 95–103.
Chapter
Křístek, Michal.
British theories of style. In: Křístek, Michal. A comparison of 20th century theories of style (in the context of Czech and British scholarly discourses).
2012, pp. 46–65.