Can the functional perspective of a spoken sentence be predicted from that of its written counterpart? : an inquiry based on a comparative analysis of J.D. O'Connor's and R. Kingdon's tonetic transcriptions of Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address

Title: Can the functional perspective of a spoken sentence be predicted from that of its written counterpart? : an inquiry based on a comparative analysis of J.D. O'Connor's and R. Kingdon's tonetic transcriptions of Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address
Author: Firbas, Jan
Source document: Brno studies in English. 1993, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. [23]-49
Extent
[23]-49
  • ISSN
    0231-5351
Type: Article
Language
License: Not specified license
 

Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.

References
[1] Daneš, F. (1987). 'On Prague School functionalism In linguistics', in Dirven and Fried 1987.3-38.

[2] Dirven, R. and V. Fried, eds. (1987). Functionalism in linguistics (Amsterdam: Benjamins).

[3] Firbas, J. (1987). 'Thoughts on functional sentence perspective, intonation and emotiveness, Part Two', Brno studies in English 17.9-49.

[4] Firbas, J. (1989). 'Degrees of communicative dynamism and degrees of prosodic prominence', Brno studies in English 18.21-66.

[5] Firbas, J. (1992). Functional, sentence perspective in written and spoken communication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

[6] Kingdon, R. (1958). English intonation practice (London: Longmans).

[7] Kopečný, F. (1962). Základy české skladby, 2nd ed. (Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství).

[8] O'Connor, J . D. (1971). Advanced phonetic reader (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

[9] O'Connor, J. D. and G. F. Arnold (1973). Intonation of colloquial English, 2nd ed. (London: Longman).

[10] Svoboda, A. (1968). 'The hierarchy of communicative units and fields as illustrated by English attributive constructions', Brno studies in English 7.61-86.

[11] Svoboda, A. (1981). Diatheme (Brno: Masaryk University).

[12] Svoboda, A. (1983). 'Thematic elements', Brno studies in English 15.49-85.

[13] Uhlenbeck, E. M. (1983). 'Linguistics, neither psychology nor sociology', 1983 NIAS lecture (Wassenaar: NIAS).

[14] Vachek, J. (1989). Written language revisited (Amsterdam: Benjamins).