[1] Benveniste, E. 1967. Fondements syntaxiques de la composition nominale. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 62/1, 15–31. – reprint in E. Benveniste: Problèmes de linguistique générale II. Paris 1974, 145–162.
[2] Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford.
[4] Dryer, M. S. 1997. Are grammatical relations universal? In: Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón. Ed. J. Bybee, J. Haiman a S. Thompson. Amsterdam – Philadelphia, 115–143.
[6] Haspelmath, M. 2007.
Pre‑established categories don't exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11, 119–132 |
DOI 10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011
[7] Martinet, A. 1975. Studies in Functional Syntax. München.
[8] Newmeyer, F. J. 2007.
Linguistic typology requires crosslinguistic formal categories. Linguistic Typology 11, 133–157. |
DOI 10.1515/LINGTY.2007.012