Textuality, heritage, and identity in Hungary: contexts for the interpretation of Szikszai's insertion in Macbeth (2018)

Název: Textuality, heritage, and identity in Hungary: contexts for the interpretation of Szikszai's insertion in Macbeth (2018)
Zdrojový dokument: Theatralia. 2021, roč. 24, č. Special Issue, s. 222-238
Rozsah
222-238
  • ISSN
    1803-845X (print)
    2336-4548 (online)
Type: Článek
Jazyk
 

Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel.

Abstrakt(y)
The present essay explores the textual politics and politicised textuality in Rémusz Szikszai's Macbeth, which premiered in a public theatre, the Jászai Mari Theatre, Tatabánya, Hungary in 2018, then in 2019 moved to the Szkéné Theatre, Budapest. In the focus of this exploration is a textual insertion by the director which took the form of Duncan's speech regarding changing the method of succession in Scotland. This insertion is analysed in light of interpretive traditions in the context of changes in Hungarian theatre culture since 1989, the relationship between the theatre and the state, and especially in the context of political tropes appearing in Shakespeare productions. Two conclusions will follow from the analysis with respect to the added text. The first of these is connected to the moderately liberal textual strategy of this insertion, which is responsible for the political orientation of the production. The second is the reconsideration of the gravity of the insertion appreciated in a larger historical context as well as in the particular context of the production.
Reference
[1] CAUCHI, Francesca. 2015. 'Compunctious Visitings': Conscience as Unequivocal Witness in Macbeth. Philological Quarterly 94 (2015): 4: 335–351.

[2] CSÁKI Judit. 2001. Színház: Malcolm Orbán Viktor? (A Macbeth a Tivoliban) [Theatre: Is Malcolm Viktor Orbán? (Macbeth in the Tivoli)]. Magyar Narancs 46 (2001). [accessed on 13.01.2021]. Available online at http://magyarnarancs.hu/zene2/szinhaz_malcolm_orban_viktor_a_macbeth_a_tivoliban-56687.

[3] IMRE, Zoltán. 2005. Szöveg-Előadás Lehetséges Kapcsolata a Kortárs (Magyar) Színházban [The Relationship between the Text and the Production in the Contemporary (Hungarian) Theatre]. Irodalomtörténet 36 (2005): 273–298.

[4] IMRE, Zoltán. 2018. Theatre and Ideology: Staging The Merchant of Venice at the Hungarian National Theatre in 1940 and 1986. European Judaism 51 (2018): 2: 213–222. | DOI 10.3167/ej.2017.510228

[5] INCZE, Tünde. 2003. Rejtett Terek a Macbethben [Hidden Places in Macbeth]. In István Géher and Attila Atilla Kiss (eds.). Az Értelmezés Rejtett Terei [The Hidden Places of Interpretation]. Budapest: Kijárat kiadó, 2003: 143–157.

[6] KÁLLAY, Géza. 2002. Nem puszta kép [Not Merely an Image]. Budapest: Liget, 2002.

[7] KISS, Csaba. 2007. 'Bár Magamról Ne Tudnék': Macbeth – Olvasás Rendezői Szemmel ['twere best not know myself': Macbeth – Reading with the Director's Eyes]. In István Géher and Katalin Tabi (eds.). 'Látszanak Mert Játszhatók': Shakespeare a Színpad Tükrében ['For they are actions that a man might play': Shakespeare in the Mirror of the Stage]. Budapest: ELTE, 2007: 131–150.

[8] KISS, Gabriella. 2008. Magyar dráma és színház a 20. században [Hungarian Drama and Theatre in the 20th Century]. Irodalomtörténet 39 (2008): 71–101.

[9] KOLIN, Philip C. 1974. Macbeth, Malcolm, and the Curse of the Serpent. The South Central Bulletin 34 (1974): 4: 159–160. | DOI 10.2307/3188261

[10] KRISTÓF, Luca. 2018. Az Elitcsere Korlátai. Kultúrpolitika És Re-Putáció a Magyar Színházi Mezőben [The Limits of the Change of Elites. Politics of Culture and Re-Putation in the Hungarian Theatrical Field]. Szociológiai Szemle 28 (2018): 1: 33–59. [accessed on 13.01.2021]. Available online at http://real.mtak.hu/63432/7/kristof_szocszemle_elitcsere.pdf.

[11] LEMON, Rebecca. 2002. Scaffolds of Treason in 'Macbeth'. Theatre Journal 54 (2002): 1: 25–43. | DOI 10.1353/tj.2002.0020

[12] RADNÓTI, Zsuzsa. 2005. A Magyar Posztdramatikusok (Az Irodalmi Drámától Az Előadásszövegig) [The Hungarian Postdramatists (From Literary Drama to Playtext)]. Irodalomtörténet 36 (2005): 86: 257–266.

[13] RAMSEY, Jarold. 1973. The Perversion of Manliness in Macbeth. Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 13 (1973): 2: 285–300.

[14] SCHANDL, Veronika. 2009. Socialist Shakespeare Productions in Kádár-Regime Hungary: Shakespeare behind the Iron Curtain. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2009.

[15] SHAKESPEARE, William. 1993. Hamlet Dán Királyfi Tragédiája [Tragedy of Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark]. Transl. by István Eörsi. Budapest: Cserépfalvi Kiadó, 1993.

[16] SHAKESPEARE, William. 2006. Macbeth. Ed. by Barbara A. Mowat. [accessed on 13.01.2021]. Available online at https://msha.btk.ppke.hu/items/show/7.

[17] SHAKESPEARE, William. 2012. Shakespeare Három Dráma: Hamlet, Szentivánéji Álom, Lear Király [Shakespeare's Three Dramas: Hamlet, A Midsummer Night's Dream, King Lear]. Transl. by Ádám Nádasdy. Budapest: Magvető, 2012.

[18] SZIKSZAI, Rémusz. 2018. Macbeth, avagy a skót darab [Macbeth, or the Scottish Play]. Playtext. Jászai Mari Theatre, Tatabánya.

[19] TABI, Katalin. 2018. Hamlet: drámák és szövegkönyvek [Hamlet: Dramas and Playtexts]. Bárka 26 (2018): 15: 68–73. [accessed on 13.01.2021]. Available online at http://barkaonline.hu/esszektanulmanyok/6494-hamlet--dramak-es-szovegkonyvek-.

[20] WOFFORD, Susanne L. 2017. Origin Stories of Fear and Tyranny: Blood and Dismemberment in Macbeth (with a Glance at the Oresteia). Comparative Drama 51 (2017): 4: 506–527. | DOI 10.1353/cdr.2017.0041

[21] ZITNER, Sheldon P. 1964. Macbeth and the Moral Scale of Tragedy. The Journal of General Education 16 (1964): 1: 20–28.