SNAP/SPAN in Basic Formal Ontology: an Aristotelian suggestion

Title: SNAP/SPAN in Basic Formal Ontology: an Aristotelian suggestion
Source document: ProInflow. 2013, vol. 5, iss. 1, pp. 55-65
  • ISSN
Type: Article
License: Not specified license

Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.

Basic Formal Ontology (Základní formální ontologie, zkr. BFO) vyvíjená Barry Smithem a jeho spolupracovníky je fundamentální ontologie užívaná v informační vědě k popisu entit na nejvyšší úrovni obecnosti. Jedním z nápadných rysů BFO je rozdělení entit na ty, které trvají (continuants) a jsou součástí ontologie SNAP (snap = snímek), a na ty, které se dějí (occurents) a jsou součástí ontologie SPAN (span = rozpětí). Toto dělení je motivováno kontroverzí mezi endurantismem a perdurantismem v současné analytické metafyzice. V tomto článku, v návaznosti na Aristotela, navrhuji v zájmu realismu určitou modifikaci Smithova přístupu.
Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), developed by Barry Smith and his colleagues, is a foundational ontology used in information science for the description of entities at the highest level of generality. One of the salient features of BFO is the division of entities into continuants of so-called SNAP (or snapshot) ontology and occurents of so-called SPAN (or spanning time) ontology. The division is motivated by an apparent impasse in the endurantist/perdurantist controversy in recent analytical metaphysics. In this paper, drawing on Aristotle, I suggest a realism-supporting modification of Smith's approach.
The work on this paper was supported by the Post-doctoral Fellowship in "Analytical Scholasticism" (Rozvoj postdoktorandských pozic na JU, CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0049).
[1] BARNES, Jonathan. Metaphysics. In The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Ed. J. Barnes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. ISBN 0-5214-22949.

[2] FORGUSON, Lynd. Common Sense. London: Routledge, 1989. ISBN 0-4150-23025.

[3] GRENON, Pierre – SMITH, Barry. SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2004, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 69–103. ISSN 1387-5868. | DOI 10.1207/s15427633scc0401_5

[4] GRENON, Pierre – SMITH, Barry. Persistence and Ontological Pluralism. In Persistence. Ed. C. Kanzian, Frankfurt: Ontos, 2008, pp. 33–48. ISBN 978-3-938793-74-9.

[5] HINTIKKA, Jaako. Aristotle on the Realization of Possibilities in Time. In Reforging the Great Chain of Being. Ed. S. Knuuttila, Dortrecht: D. Reidel, 1980, pp. 57−72. ISBN 9-0277-11259.

[6] HINTIKKA, Jaakko. Aristotle and the Ambiguity of Ambiguity. In Time and Necessity. Ed. J. Hintikka, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973, pp. 1−26. ISBN 0-1982-43650.

[7] INGARDEN, Roman. Time and Modes of Being. Trans. H. Michejda, C. Thomas. Springfield, 1964.

[8] McDANIEL, Kris. Ways of Being. In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Ed. D. Chalmers, D. Manley, R. Wasserman, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. ISBN 0-1995-46002.

[9] MUNN, Katherine – SMITH, Barry, eds. Applied Ontology: An Introduction. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2009. ISBN 978-3-938793-98-5.

[10] LEWIS, David. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986. ISBN 0-6312-24262.

[11] LOUX, Michael. Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. London: Routledge, 2002. ISBN 0-415-26107-4.

[12] SIDER, Theodore. Four-dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. ISBN 0-1992-63523.

[13] SIMONS, Peter, Parts: A Study in Ontology. Claredon Press: Oxford, 1987. ISBN 0-1992-41465.

[14] SMITH, Barry, ed. Parts and Moments: Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology. Munich: Philosophia, 1982. ISBN 3-8840-50125.

[15] SMITH, Barry – CEUSTERS, Werner. Ontological Realism as a Methodology for Coordinated Evolution of Scientific Ontologies. Applied Ontology, 2010, vol. 5, pp. 139–188. ISSN 1570-5838.

[16] SMITH, Barry – GRENON, Pierre. The Cornucopia of Formal-Ontological Relations. Dialectica, 2004, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 279–296. ISSN 0012-2017. | DOI 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2004.tb00305.x

[17] SOWA, John F. Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Boston, MA: Course Technology, 2000. ISBN 0-534-94965-7.

[18] TARSKI, Alfred. Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Sciences. New York: Dover, 1995. ISBN 0-4862-8462X.

[19] YU, Jiyuan. What is the Focal Meaning of Being in Aristotle? Aperion: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, 2001, vol. 34, pp. 205-231. ISSN 2156-7093.

[20] YU, Jiyuan. Two Conceptions of Hylomorphism in Metaphysics ZH. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 1997, vol. 15, pp. 119-145. ISSN 0265-7651.

[21] YU, Jiyuan. The Structure of Being in Aristotle's Metaphysics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003. ISBN 1-4020-15372.

[22] ZEMACH, Edward. Four Ontologies. The Journal of Philosophy, 1970, vol. 23, pp. 231–247. ISSN 0022-362X. | DOI 10.2307/2024185