Adverbial trigrams in semantic and communication contexts

Title: Adverbial trigrams in semantic and communication contexts
Author: Sokolová, Jana
Source document: Linguistica Brunensia. 2022, vol. 70, iss. 1, pp. 25-38
Extent
25-38
  • ISSN
    1803-7410 (print)
    2336-4440 (online)
Type: Article
Language
 

Notice: These citations are automatically created and might not follow citation rules properly.

Abstract(s)
In this paper, we focus on the linearization of components in adverbial trigrams. We will analyze and interpret the selected phenomena based on the data collected from the Russian National Corpus. Therefore, the focus will be on adverbial trigrams in their resulting and narrativized form as sequences that meet in the sentence structure both as a result of the sentence structure itself (determined by word order where each component is a separate syntactic unit), and as a complex syntactic unit, i.e. as compound adverbials. This paper is an attempt to analyze the content of adverbial trigrams, their formalization and explanation through the communication validity and functional hierarchy attributed to them by the speaker. Our goal is to identify the (i) semantic types of components, (ii) types (models) of most preferred configurations in the narrative and (iii) cognitive and linguistic factors involved in encoding the adverbial trigrams (the configuration is assumed or limited).
References
[1] Biskup, Petr. 2010. Slovosled adverbiálií stejné sémantické třídy. (Word order of adverbials of the same semantic class) In: Užívání a prožívání jazyka. K 90. narozeninám Františka Daneše. S. Čmejrková – J. Hoffmannová – E. Havlová, eds. Praha: Karolinum, pp. 221–225.

[2] Biskup, Petr. 2017. Hierarchie adverbiálií. (Hierarchy of adverbials) In: P. Karlík – M. Nekula – J. Pleskalová (eds.): CzechEncy – Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny. [retrieved 17.7.2021]. Available at: https://www.czechency.org/slovnik/HIERARCHIE%20ADVERBI%C3%81LI%C3%8D.

[3] Grepl, Miroslav – Karlík, Petr. 1998. Skladba češtiny (Syntax of the Czech language). Olomouc: Votobia.

[4] Horecký, Ján. 1963. Pokus o štruktúrnu analýzu termínov. (An attempt at a structural analysis of terms) In: Československý terminologický časopis. 2(5), pp. 274–288.

[5] Miko, František. 1971. Generovanie príslovkového určenia v slovenčine. (Creation of adverbial modifications in Slovak) In: Jazykovedné štúdie XI. Bratislava: Veda, vydavateľstvo SAV, pp. 185–202.

[6] Miko, František. 1989. Aspekty literárneho textu (Aspects of literary text). Nitra: Pedagogická fakulta.

[7] Mluvnice češtiny 3. Skladba. 1987. (The Grammar of Czech Language 3). Praha: Academia.

[8] Национальный корпус русского языка. Available at: https://ruscorpora.ru/new.

[9] Novák, Ľudovít. 1981. Ešte raz: Axiológia semiológie lineárnych útvarov. (Once again: Axiology of the semiology of linear formations) In: Jazykovedné štúdie XVI. J. Ružička, ed. Bratislava: Veda, vydavateľstvo SAV, pp. 17–22.

[10] Падучева Елена Викторовна. 2013. Эгоцентрические единицы языка и режимы интерпретации. (Egocentricals and their registers of interpretation) In: Компьютерная лингвистика и интеллектуальные технологии «Диалог» (2013). Том 1, с. 538–555. [retrieved 11.6.2021]. Available at: https://www.dialog-21.ru/digest/2013/.

[11] Sokolová, Jana. 2019. Egocentriká – výrazy so sémanticko-pragmatickou orientáciou na hovoriaceho (Egocentricals – expressions with a semantic-pragmatic orientation towards the speaker). In: Slovenská reč. 84(1), pp. 10–25.

[12] Šikra, Juraj. 1991. Sémantika slovenských prísloviek (Semantics of Slovak adverbs). Bratislava: Veda, vydavateľstvo SAV.

[13] Štěpán, Josef. 1989. K složeným příslovečným určením prostoru a času. (On compound adverbial modifications of space and time.) In: Slovo a slovesnost. 50(1), pp. 10–14.

[14] Vaňko, Juraj. 2010. Fixátory dependencie. (Dependency fixators) In: Morfologické aspekty súčasnej slovenčiny. J. Dolník, ed. Bratislava: Veda, vydavateľstvo SAV, pp. 265–325.